Advertisement

Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 45–52 | Cite as

Beyond Illinois Brick: The Law and Economics of Cost Pass-Through in the ADM Price Fixing Case

  • Ronald Cotterill
  • Leonard Egan
  • William Buckhold
Article

Abstract

This article reviews the legal standards and theeconomics of pass-through to indirect purchasers andillustrates these principles with a case involving ADMin the market for high fructose corn syrup (HFCS).With three assumptions about production technologies,buyers of HFCS experience a 100 percent pass throughof the direct overcharge. The extent of pass throughof the increase by buyers is shown to dependcritically upon the market structure of the purchasingindustry and the shape of the retail demand curve. Flexible demand functional forms are needed to avoidconstraining estimated pass through rates.

High fructose corn syrup Illinois Brick indirect overcharges pass-through of injuries price fixing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumol, W. J. (1972) Economic Theory and Operations Analysis. 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Connor, J. M., R. T. Rogers, B. W. Marion, and W. F. Mueller (1985) The Food Manufacturing Industries. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  3. Cotterill, R. W. (1994) ‘An Econometric Analysis of the Demand for RTE Cereal: Product Market Definition and Unilateral Market Power Effects’, Appendix C Trial Affidavit, State of New York vs. Kraft General Foods Inc. et al., U.S. District Court, Southern District, No. 93 Civ 0811.Google Scholar
  4. Cotterill, R. W. (1998) ‘Estimation of Cost Pass Through to Michigan Consumers in the ADM High Fructose Corn Syrup Price Fixing Case’, Food Marketing Policy Center Research Report #39. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar
  5. Cotterill, R. W., A. W. Franklin, and L. Y. Ma (1996) ‘Measuring Market Power Effects in Differentiated Product Industries: An Application to the Soft Drink Industry’, Research Report No. 32. Food Marketing Policy Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269. April.Google Scholar
  6. Gardner, B. L. (1975) ‘The Farm-Retail Price Spread in a Competitive Food Industry’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 399–409.Google Scholar
  7. Harris, R. G., and L. A. Sullivan (1979) ‘Passing on the Monopoly Overcharge: A Comprehensive Policy Analysis’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 128, 269–360.Google Scholar
  8. Hausman, J., G. Leonard, and J. D. Zona (1994) ‘Competitive Analysis with Differentiated Products’, Annales D'Économie et de Statistique, (34), 159–180.Google Scholar
  9. Jacobson, R. (1991) ‘Milk Prices: At the Farm and to the Consumer’, Dairy Marketing Notes No. 2. Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  10. Kinnucan, H.W., and O. D. Forker (1987) ‘Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission for Major Dairy Products’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69, 285–292.Google Scholar
  11. Scherer, F. M. (1982) ‘The Breakfast Cereal Industry’, in W. Adams, ed., The Structure of American Industry. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  12. Scherer, F. M., and D. Ross (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  13. Scherer, F. M. et al. (1975) The Effects of Multi-Plant Operation, Harvard Economic Studies, Vol. 145. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sexton, R. J., and N. Lavoie (1999) ‘Food Processing and Distribution: An Industrial Organization Approach’, in Handbook of Agricultural Economics. Davis: University of California (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Cotterill
    • 1
  • Leonard Egan
    • 1
  • William Buckhold
    • 1
  1. 1.U-21, Food Marketing Policy CenterUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations