Plant Ecology

, Volume 150, Issue 1–2, pp 145–159 | Cite as

Effects of long-term rainfall variability on evapotranspiration and soil water distribution in the Chihuahuan Desert: A modeling analysis

  • James F. Reynolds
  • Paul R. Kemp
  • John D. Tenhunen

Abstract

We used the patch arid land simulator (PALS-FT) – a simple, mechanistic ecosystem model – to explore long-term variation in evapotranspiration (ET) as a function of variability in rainfall and plant functional type (FT) at a warm desert site in southern New Mexico. PALS-FT predicts soil evaporation and plant transpiration of a canopy composed of five principal plant FTs: annuals, perennial forbs, C4 grasses, sub-shrubs, and evergreen shrubs. For each FT, the fractional contribution to transpiration depends upon phenological activity and cover as well as daily leaf stomatal conductance, which is a function of plant water potential, calculated from root-weighted soil water potential in six soil layers. Simulations of water loss from two plant community types (grass- vs. shrub-dominated) were carried out for the Jornada Basin, New Mexico, using 100 years of daily precipitation data (1891–1990). In order to emphasize variability associated with rainfall and fundamental differences in FT composition between communities, the seasonal patterns cover of perennials were held constant from year to year. Because the relative amount of year to year cover of winter and summer annual species is highly variable in this ecosystem, we examined their influence on model predictions of ET by allowing their cover to be variable, fixed, or absent.

Over the entire 100-yr period, total annual ET is highly correlated with total annual rainfall in both community types, although T and E alone are less strongly correlated with rainfall, and variation in transpiration is nearly 3 times greater than evaporation and 2 times greater than variation in rainfall (CV of rainfall = 35%). Water use shows a relatively high similarity between the grass- and shrub-dominated communities, with a 100-yr average T/ET of 34% for both communities. However, based on a year-by-year comparison between communities, T/ET was significantly greater in the grass-dominated community, reflecting the fact that over the long term more than half of the rain occurs in the summer and is used slightly more efficiently (T¿E) by the C4-grass community than the shrub community, although we found some rainfall patterns that resulted in much greater T/ET in the shrub community in a given year. Percent of water lost as transpiration (T/ET) suggests that while there is a general trend toward increased T/ET with rainfall in both community types, T/ET is extremely variable over the 100-yr simulation, especially for normal and below normal amounts of rainfall (T/ET values range from 1 to 58% for the grass-dominated site and 6 to 60% for the shrub-dominated site).

These predictions suggest that because of the relatively shallow distribution of soil water, there is little opportunity for vertical partitioning of the soil water resource by differential rooting depths of the plant FTs, in contrast to the two-layer hypothesis of Walter (1971). However, functional types may avoid competition by keying on particular `windows' of moisture availability via differences in phenologies. We found very little differences in average, long-term model predictions of T, E, and ET when annual plant cover was variable, fixed, or absent. The results of our simulations help reconcile some of the disparate conclusions drawn from experimental studies about the relative contribution of transpiration vs. evaporation to total evapotranspiration, primarily by revealing the great year-to-year variability that is possible.

Arid rangeland Bouteloua eriopoda Climate variability Desertification Jornada Basin Larrea tridentata Long-term Simulation model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer, S., C. Scifres, C. R. Bassham and R. Maggio. 1988. Autogenic succession in a subtropical savanna: conversion of grassland to thorn woodland. Ecol. Monog. 58: 111–127.Google Scholar
  2. Baier, W. and G. W. Robertson. 1966. A new versatile soil moisture budget. Can. J. Plant Sci. 46: 299–315.Google Scholar
  3. Briones, O., C. Montaña and E. Ezcurra. 1996. Competition between three Chihuahuan desert species: evidence from plant size-distance relations and root distribution. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 453–460.Google Scholar
  4. Brisson, J. and J. F. Reynolds. 1994. The effect of neighbors on root distribution in a creosotebush (Larrea tridentata) population. Ecology 75: 1693–1702.Google Scholar
  5. Buffington, L. C. and C. H. Herbel. 1965. Vegetational changes on a semidesert grassland range from 1858 to 1963. Ecol. Monog. 35: 139–164.Google Scholar
  6. Cable, D. R. 1969. Competition in the semi-desert grass-shrub type as influenced by root systems, growth habits, and soil moisture extraction. Ecology 50: 27–38.Google Scholar
  7. Cable, D. R. 1980. Seasonal patterns of soil water recharge and extraction on semidesert ranges. J. Range Manag. 33: 9–15.Google Scholar
  8. Caldwell, M. M. 1985. Cold desert. In: Chabot, B. F. and Mooney, H. A. (eds), Physiological ecology of North American plant communities. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Caldwell, M. M., R. S. White, R. T. Moore and L. B. Camp. 1977. Carbon balance, productivity; water use of cold-winter desert shrub communities dominated by C3 and C4 species. Oecologia 29: 275–300.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, G. S. and G. A. Harris. 1977. Water relations and water use patterns for Artemisia tridentata Nutt. in wet and dry years. Ecology 58: 652–659.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, G. S., J. D. Jungbauer, Jr., S. Shiozawa and R. D. Hungerford. 1993. A one-parameter equation for water sorption isotherm of soils. Soil Sci. 156: 302–306.Google Scholar
  12. Cannon, W. A. 1911. The root habits of desert plants. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ. 131: 1–96.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, J. L. and J. F. Reynolds. 1997. GePSi: a generic plant simulator based on object-oriented principles. Ecological Modelling 94: 53–66.Google Scholar
  14. Conley, W., M. R. Conley and T. R. Karl. 1992. A computational study of episodic events and historical context in long-term ecological process: Climate and grazing in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Coenoses 7: 55–60.Google Scholar
  15. Cornelius, J. M., P. R. Kemp, J. A. Ludwig and G. L. Cunningham. 1991. The distribution of vascular plant species and guilds in space and time along a desert gradient. J. Veg. Sci. 2: 59–72.Google Scholar
  16. Ehleringer, J. R., S. L. Phillips, W. S. Schuster and D. R. Sandquist. 1991. Differential utilization of summer rains by desert plants. Oecologia 88: 430–434.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, D. D., T. W. Sammis and D. R. Cable. 1981. Actual evapotranspiration under desert conditions. Pp. 195–218. In: Evans, D. D. & Thames, J. L. (eds), Water in Desert Ecosystems. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, PA.Google Scholar
  18. Gile, L. H., J.W. Hawley and R. B. Grossman. 1981. Soils and geomorphology in the basin and range area of southern New Mexico -guidebook to the Desert Project. Report No. Memoir 39, New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico.Google Scholar
  19. Guo, Q. F. and J. H. Brown. 1997. Interactions between winter and summer annuals in the Chihuahuan desert. Oecologia 111: 123–128.Google Scholar
  20. Heerman, D. F., M. D. Finkner and E. A. Hilner. 1971. Probability of sequences of wet and dry days for eleven western states and Texas. Tech. Bull. No. 117, Colorado State University. Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  21. Hunter, R. B. 1989. Competition between adult and seedling shrubs of Ambrosia dumosa in the Mojave desert. Great Basin Nat. 49: 79–84.Google Scholar
  22. Kemp, P. R. 1983. Phenological patterns of Chihuahuan Desert plants in relation to the timing of water availability. J. Ecol. 71: 427–436.Google Scholar
  23. Kemp, P. R., J. F. Reynolds, Y. Pachepsky and J. L. Chen. 1997. A comparative modeling study of soil water dynamics in a desert ecosystem. Water Resources Res. 33: 73–90.Google Scholar
  24. Lane, L. J., E. M. Romney and T. E. Hakonson. 1984.Water balance calculations and net production of perennial vegetation in the northern Mojave Desert. J. Range Manag. 37: 12–18.Google Scholar
  25. Linacre, E. T. 1973. A simpler empirical expression for actual evapotranspiration rates -a discussion. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 11: 451–452.Google Scholar
  26. Liu, B. L., F. Phillips, S. Hoines, A. R. Campbell and P. Sharma. 1995. Water movement in desert soil traced by hydrogen and oxygen isotopes, chloride, and chlorine-36, southern Arizona. J. Hydrol. 168: 91–110.Google Scholar
  27. Marion, G. M., W. H. Schlesinger and P. J. Fonteyn. 1985. CALDEP: a regional model for CaCO3 (caliche) deposition in southwestern deserts. Soil Sci. 139: 468–481.Google Scholar
  28. McClaran, M. P. and T. R. Van Devender (eds). 1995. The desert grassland. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  29. Montaña, C., B. Cavagnaro and O. Briones. 1995. Soil water use by co-existing shrubs and grasses in the southern Chihuahuan Desert, Mexico. J. Arid Environ. 31: 1–13.Google Scholar
  30. Neilson, R. P. 1986. High-resolution climatic analysis and southwest biogeography. Science 232: 27–34.Google Scholar
  31. Nichols, W. D. 1992. Energy budgets and resistances to energy transport in sparsely vegetated rangeland. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 60: 221–247.Google Scholar
  32. Nobel, P. S. 1976. Water relations and photosynthesis of a desert CAM plant, Agave deserti. Plant Physiol. 58: 576–582.Google Scholar
  33. Noy-Meir, I. 1973. Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 25–41.Google Scholar
  34. Paruelo, J. M. and O. E. Sala. 1995. Water losses in the Patagonian steppe: a modelling approach. Ecology 76: 510–520.Google Scholar
  35. Peláez, R., R. A. Distel, R. M. Bóo, O. R. Elia and M. D. Mayor. 1994. Water relations between shrubs and grasses in semi-arid Argentina. J. Arid Environ. 27: 71–78.Google Scholar
  36. Phillips, F. M. 1994. Environmental tracers for water movement in desert soils of the American southwest. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 15–24.Google Scholar
  37. Reynolds, J. F., R. J. Fernández and P. R. Kemp. 1999a. Drylands and global change: The effect of rainfall variability on sustainable rangeland production. In: Watanabe, K. N. and Komanine, A. (eds), Proceedings of the Twelfth Toyota Conference: Challenge of Plant and Agricultural Sciences to the Crisis of Biosphere on the Earth in the 21th Century. November 25- 28, Mikkabi, Shizuoka, Japan. Landes Biosciences, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  38. Reynolds, J. F., R. A. Virginia, P. R. Kemp, A. G. deSoyza and D. C. Tremmel. 1999b. Impact of drought on desert shrubs: effects of seasonality and degree of resource island development. Ecol. Monog. 69: 69–106.Google Scholar
  39. Reynolds, J. F., R. A. Virginia and W. H. Schlesinger. 1997. Defining functional types for models of desertification. Pp. 194–214. In: Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H. & Woodward, F. I. (eds), Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  40. Ritchie, J. T. 1972. Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resources Res. 8: 1204–1213.Google Scholar
  41. Rundel, P.W. and P. S. Nobel. 1991. Structure and function in desert root systems. Pp. 349–377. In: Atkinson, D. (ed.), Plant root growth: an ecological perspective. Special Publ. No. 10, British Ecol. Soc., Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford.Google Scholar
  42. Sala, O. E., R. A. Golluscio, W. K. Lauenroth and A. Soriano. 1989. Resource partitioning between shrubs and grasses in the Patagonian steppe. Oecologia 81: 501–505.Google Scholar
  43. Sala, O. E., W. K. Lauenroth and R. A. Golluscio. 1997. Plant functional types in temperate semi-arid regions. Pp. 217–233. In: Smith, T.M., Shugart, H. H. & Woodward, F. I. (eds), Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  44. Sammis, T.W. and L. Y. Gay. 1979. Evapotranspiration from an arid zone plant community. J. Arid Environ. 2: 313–321.Google Scholar
  45. Scanlon, B. R. 1992. Evaluation of liquid and vapor flow in desert soils based on chlorine 36 and tritium tracers and non isothermal flow simulations. Water Resources Res. 28: 285–297.Google Scholar
  46. Scanlon, B. R. 1994. Water and heat fluxes in desert soils. 1. Field studies. Water Resources Res. 30: 709–719.Google Scholar
  47. Schlesinger, W. H., P. J. Fonteyn and G. M. Marion. 1987. Soil moisture content and plant transpiration in the Chihuahuan Desert of New Mexico. J. Arid Environ. 12: 119–126.Google Scholar
  48. Schlesinger, W. H. and C. S. Jones. 1984. The comparative importance of overland runoff and mean annual rainfall to shrub communities of the Mojave Desert. Botanical Gazette l45: 116–124.Google Scholar
  49. Schlesinger, W. H., J. F. Reynolds, G. L. Cunningham, L. F. Huenneke, W. M. Jarrell, R. A. Virginia and W. G. Whitford. 1990. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247: 1043–1048.Google Scholar
  50. Schlesinger, W. H., T. J. Ward and J. Anderson. 1999. Nutrient losses in runoff from grassland and shrubland habitats in Southern NewMexico: I. field plots. Biogeochemistry: in review.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, S. D., C. A. Herr, K. L. Leary and J. M. Piorkowski. 1995. Soil-plant water relations in a Mojave Desert mixed shrub community: A comparison of three geomorphic surfaces. J. Arid Environ. 29: 339–351.Google Scholar
  52. Stark, N. 1970. Water balance of some warm desert plants in a wet year. J. Hydrol. 10: 113–126.Google Scholar
  53. Stephens, D. B. 1994. A perspective on diffuse natural recharge mechanisms in areas of low precipitation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 40–48.Google Scholar
  54. Walker, B. H. and I. Noy-Meir. 1982. Aspects of stability and resilience of savanna ecosystems. Pp. 556–590. In: Huntley, B. J. and Walker, B. H. (eds), Ecology of tropical savannas, ecological studies, Vol. 42. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  55. Walter, H. 1971. Ecology of tropical and subtropical vegetation. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  56. Wierenga, P. J., J. M. H. Hendrickx, M. H. Nash, J. Ludwig and L. A. Daugherty. 1987. Variation of soil and vegetation with distance along a transect in the Chihuahuan Desert. J. Arid Environ. 13: 53–63.Google Scholar
  57. Yeaton, R. I., J. Travis and E. Gilinsky. 1977. Competition and spacing in plant communities: the Arizona upland association. J. Ecol. 65: 587–595.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. Reynolds
    • 1
  • Paul R. Kemp
    • 2
  • John D. Tenhunen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BotanyPhytotron-Science Dr. Duke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Plant EcologyUniversity of BayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations