Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 119–149 | Cite as

On the Path to College: Three Critical Tasks Facing America's Disadvantaged

  • Alberto F. Cabrera
  • Steven M. La Nasa
Article

Abstract

A middle high school student's likelihood of continuing on to college or university rests on the completion of at least three critical tasks: (a) acquiring at least minimal college qualification, (b) actually graduating from high school, and (c) applying to a 4-year college or university. Eighty-one percent of those 1988 eighth graders who completed these three tasks enrolled in college by 1994. The path to college among socioeconomically disadvantaged middle high school students can best be characterized as hazardous. By 1994, just 1 out of 10 of the original class of 1988 poor eighth graders was attending a 4-year institution. Comparative analyses of lowest and highest SES students reveal substantial differences between these two groups, favoring upper-SES individuals at each of the three tasks on the path to college. These substantial SES-gaps are reduced, if not eliminated, once a number of influential school-based and family background variables are taken into account.

college choice access postsecondary opportunity socioeconomic status 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adelman, C. (1998). Academic resources: Developing an alternative index of individual student capital. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  2. Adelman, C. (1999a). The rest of the river. University Business,43-48.Google Scholar
  3. Adelman, C. (1999b). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. Document #PLLI 1999-8021. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, K. L., and Eckland, B. K. (1975). Basic attainment processes: a replication and extension. Sociology of Education 48: 457-495.Google Scholar
  5. Berkner, L. K., and Chavez, L. (1997, October). Access to postsecondary education for the 1992 high school graduates.Statistical Analysis Report, NCES 98-105. Washing-ton, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improve-ment, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel and A. Halsey (eds.), Power and Ideology in Education. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cabrera, A. F. (1994). Logistic regression analysis in higher education: an applied per-spective. In John C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook for the Study of Higher Education Vol. 10, pp. 225-256. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cabrera, A. F., and La Nasa, S. M. (2000). On the path to college: three critical tasks on facing America's disadvantaged. Report to the Association for Institutional Research. University Park: Center for the Study of Higher Education, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, X., and Kauffman, P. (1997). Risk and resilience: The effects of dropping out of school. Paper presented before the annual meeting of the American Association of Education Research. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  10. Choy, S. P. (2000, April). Low-income students: who they are and how they pay for their education. Postsecondary Education Descriptive Analysis Reports, NCES 2000-169. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  11. Choy, S. P., and Ottinger, C. (1998, November). Choosing a postsecondary institution. Statistical Analysis Report, NCES 98-080. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  12. Choy, S. P., and Premo, M. D. (1996). How low-income undergraduates financed post-secondary education: 1992-93. Statistical Analysis Report NCES 96-161. Washing-ton, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, R. M. (1983). Family Life and School Achievement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95-120.Google Scholar
  15. Conklin, M. E., and Dailey, A. R. (1981). Does consistency of parental educational encouragement matter for secondary students? Sociology of Education 54(4): 254-262.Google Scholar
  16. Cuccaro-Alamin, S., and Choy, S. P. (1998). Postsecondary financing strategies: how undergraduates combine work, borrowing, and attendance. Statistical Analysis Report, No. NCES 98-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  17. Duncan, O. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In A. J. Reiss (ed.), Occupations and Social Status, pp. 109-138. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eckstrom, R. B. (1985). A Descriptive Study of the Public High School Guidance: A Report to the Commission for the Study of Precollegiate Guidance and Counseling. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service.Google Scholar
  19. Fetters, W. B., Stowe, P. S., and Owins, J. A. (1984). Quality of Responses of High School Students to Questionnaire Items. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.Google Scholar
  20. Flint, T. A. (1992). Parental and planning influences on the formation of student college choice sets. Research in Higher Education 33(6): 689-708.Google Scholar
  21. Flint, T. A. (1993). Early awareness of college financial aid: does it expand choice? Review of Higher Education 16(3): 309-327.Google Scholar
  22. Flint, T. A. (1997). Intergenerational effects of paying for college. Research in Higher Education 38(3): 313-344.Google Scholar
  23. Hearn, J. C. (1992). Emerging variations in postsecondary attendance patterns: an inves-tigation of part-time, delayed, and nondegree enrollment. Research in Higher Education 33(6): 657-687.Google Scholar
  24. Henderson, A. T., and Berla, N. (1994). A New Generation of Evidence: The Family is Critical on Student Achievement. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.Google Scholar
  25. Horn, L. (1997). Confronting the odds: Students at risk and the pipeline to higher education. Statistical Analysis Report No. NCES 98-084. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  26. Horn, L., and Nuñez, A. M. (2000). Mapping the road to college: first generation students' math track, planning strategies, and context of support. Statistical Analysis Report No. NCES 2000-154. Washington, DC.: US Department of Education, National Center for Education.Google Scholar
  27. Horn, L. J., and Chen, X. (1998). Toward resiliency: At-risk students who make it to college Report No. PLLI 98-8056. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
  28. Hossler, D., Braxton, J., and Coopersmith, G. (1989). Understanding student college choice. In J. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 5. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  29. Hossler, D., Schmit, J., and Vesper, N. (1999). Going to College: How Social, Economic, and Educational Factors Influence the Decisions Students Make. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hossler, D., and Vesper, N. (1993). An exploratory study of the factors associated with parental saving for postsecondary education. Journal of Higher Education 64(2): 140-165.Google Scholar
  31. Ikenberry, S. O., and Hartle, T. W. (1998). Too Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing: What the Public Thinks and Knows About Paying for College. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  32. Jackson, G. (1978). Financial aid and student enrollment. Journal of Higher Education 49(6): 548-574.Google Scholar
  33. King, J. E. (1996). The Decision to Go to College: Attitudes and Experiences Associated with College Attendance Among Low-Income Students. Washington, DC: The College Board.Google Scholar
  34. Leslie, L. L., and Brinkman, P. T. (1988). The Economic Value of Higher Education. New York: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Leslie, L. L., Johnson, G. P., and Carlson, J. (1977). The impact of need-based student aid upon the college attendance decision. Journal of Education Finance 2: 269-285.Google Scholar
  36. Litten, L. H. (1982). Different strokes in the applicant pool: some refinements in a model of student college choice. Journal of Higher Education 53(4): 383-401.Google Scholar
  37. Manski, C. F., and Wise, D. A. (1983). College Choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. McDonough, P. (1997). Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  39. McPherson, M. S., and Schapiro, M. O. (1998). The Student Aid Game: Meeting Need and Rewarding Talent in American Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uni-versity Press.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, E. I. (1997). Parents' views on the value of a college education and how they will pay for it. Journal of Student Financial Aid 27(1): 20.Google Scholar
  41. Nuñez, A., and Cuccaro-Alamin, S. (1998). First-generation students: undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education. Statistical Analysis Reports #NCES 98-082. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  42. Olivas, M. A. (1985). Financial aid packaging policies: Access and ideology. Journal of Higher Education 56: 462-475.Google Scholar
  43. Oliver, M. L., and Shapiro, T. M. (1995). Black Wealth/white Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Olson, L., and Rosenfeld, R. A. (1984). Parents and the process of gaining access to student financial aid. Journal of Higher Education 55(4): 455-480.Google Scholar
  45. Perna, L. W. (2000). Differences in the decision to attend college among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Higher Education 71(2): 117-141.Google Scholar
  46. Sewell, W. H., and Hauser, R. M. (1975). Education, Occupation, and Earnings: Achievement in the Early Career. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. St. John, E. P. (1990). Price response in enrollment decisions: an analysis of the high school and beyond sophomore cohort. Research in Higher Education 31(2): 161-176.Google Scholar
  48. St. John, E. P. (1994). Assessing tuition and student aid strategies: using price-response measures to simulate pricing alternatives. Research in Higher Education 35(3): 301-335.Google Scholar
  49. St. John, E. P., and Noell, J. (1989). The effects of student financial aid on access to higher education: An analysis of progress with special consideration of minority en-rollment. Research in Higher Education 30(6): 563-581.Google Scholar
  50. St. John, E. P., Paulsen, M. B., and Starkey, J. B. (1996). The nexus between college choice and persistence. Research in Higher Education 37(2): 175-220.Google Scholar
  51. Stage, F. K., and Hossler, D. (1989). Differences in family influences on college attendance plans for male and female ninth graders. Research in Higher Education 30(3): 301-315.Google Scholar
  52. Terenzini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., and Bernal, E. M. (in press). Swimming Against the Tide: The Poor in American Higher Education. The College Board.Google Scholar
  53. Tierney, M. S. (1980). The impact of financial aid on student demand for public/private higher education. Journal of Higher Education 51(5): 527-545.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto F. Cabrera
    • 1
  • Steven M. La Nasa
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for the Study of Higher EducationThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park
  2. 2.Center for the Study of Higher EducationThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations