Journal for General Philosophy of Science

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 277–305

Identification of Matrices in Science and Engineering

  • Vincent Fella Hendricks
  • Arne Jakobsen
  • Stig Andur Pedersen
Article

Abstract

Engineering science is a scientific discipline that from the point of view of epistemology and the philosophy of science has been somewhat neglected. When engineering science was under philosophical scrutiny it often just involved the question of whether engineering is a spin-off of pure and applied science and their methods. We, however, hold that engineering is a science governed by its own epistemology, methodology and ontology. This point is systematically argued by comparing the different sciences with respect to a particular set of characterization criteria.

engineering vs. basic sciences epistemology of engineering technical matrices in science and engineering the methodology of engineering the ontological/methodological/epistemological differences betweenengineering and basic sciences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, B. G. (1957), 'Rigid Frame Failures', Journal of American Concrete Institute 23, 625-636.Google Scholar
  2. Andreasen, B. S. (1989), Anchorage of Robbed Reinforcing Bars, Doctoral Thesis, The Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
  3. Bunge, M. (1966), 'Technology and Applied Science', Technology and Culture 6, 329-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bucciarelli, L. (1994), Designing Engineers, Cambridge, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Compton, A. H. (1921), 'Possible Magnetic Polarity of Free Electrons', Philosophical Magazine 41, 279-281.Google Scholar
  6. DHI, Danish Hydraulic Institute (1996), MOUSE (Computer Application), ed. 3.3. Hø rsholm, Denmark.Google Scholar
  7. Elstner, R. C. and Hognestad, E. (1957), 'Laboratory Investigation of Rigid Frame Failures, Journal of American Concrete Institute 23, 637-668.Google Scholar
  8. Gutting, G. (1984), 'Paradigms, Revolutions and Technology', in The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? Laudan, R. (ed.), D. Reidel Publishing Company: 47-65.Google Scholar
  9. Horwich, P. (1990), Truth, Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Kuhn, T. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kuhn, T. (1973), 'Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice', Machette Lecture, Furman University.Google Scholar
  12. Kelly, K. T. (1996) The Logic of Reliable Inquiry, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jakobsen, A. and Pedersen, S. A. (1996), 'Engineering Science and the Reality', forthcoming.Google Scholar
  14. Layton, E. T. (1988), 'The Role of the Engineering Sciences', History and Technology 29, 82-97.Google Scholar
  15. Levi, I. (1991), The Fixation of Belief and its Undoing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hendricks, E., Versterholm, T. and Sorenson, S. (1992), 'Non-linear, Closed Loop, SI Engine Control Observers', SAE Technical Paper, SAE Annual Meeting, Detroit, MI, U.S.A., February.Google Scholar
  17. Van Fraassen, B. (1980), The Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hendricks, V. F. (1996), Epistemology, Methodology and Reliability, Doctoral Thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  19. Peirce, C. S. (1958), Charles S. Peirce: Selected Writings, Ed. Weiner, P. NewYork: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Price, D. de Solla, (1962), 'Is Technology Historically Independent of Science? A Study of Statistical Historiography', Technology and Culture 4, 553-568.Google Scholar
  21. Rasmussen, K. (1980), Analogier mellem Mekaniske, Akustiske og Elektriske Systemer, Polyteknisk forlag.Google Scholar
  22. Simon, H. A. (1969), The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambrige: Mass.Google Scholar
  23. Skolimowski, H. (1966), 'The Structure of Thinking in Technology', Technology and Culture 6, 371-383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thomsen, J. J. (1990), 'Modelling Human Tibia Structural Vibrations', Journal of Biomechanics 23, 3: 215-228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vincenti, W. G. (982), 'Control-Volume Analysis: A Difference in Thinking between Engineering and Physics', Technology and Culture 23, 145-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vincenti, W. G. (1990), What Engineers Know and How They Know It. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent Fella Hendricks
  • Arne Jakobsen
  • Stig Andur Pedersen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations