Advertisement

Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 9, Issue 12, pp 1671–1705 | Cite as

A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country

  • Finn Danielsen
  • Danilo S. Balete
  • Michael K. Poulsen
  • Martin Enghoff
  • Cristi M. Nozawa
  • Arne E. Jensen
Article

Abstract

The achievements of initiatives to strengthen biodiversity conservation in developing countries may be difficult to assess, since most countries have no system for monitoring biodiversity. This paper describes a simple and cost-effective, field-based biodiversity monitoring system developed specifically for areas where ‘specialist staff’ is lacking. We discuss the preliminary lessons learned from protected areas in the Philippines. Whilst the monitoring system aims to identify trends in biodiversity and its uses so as to guide management action, it also promotes the participation of local people in the management, stimulates discussions about conservation amongst stakeholders and builds the capacity of park staff and communities in management skills. In addition, it seeks to provide people with direction regarding the aims of protected areas, and reinforces the consolidation of existing livelihoods through strengthening community-based resource management systems. The field methods are: (1) standardised recording of routine observations, (2) fixed point photographing, (3) line transect survey, and (4) focus group discussion. Both bio-physical and socio-economic data are used and given equal importance. The system can be sustained using locally available resources. The approach is useful in countries embarking on shared management of park resources with local communities, where rural people depend on use of natural ecosystems, and where the economic resources for park management are limited. We hope this paper will encourage other countries to develop their own biodiversity monitoring system, letting its development become a means for capacity building whilst at the same time supporting the creation of ownership.

biodiversity developing country monitoring participation protected area 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alder D and Synnott TJ (1992) Permanent sample plot techniques for mixed tropical forest. Tropical Forestry Papers 25: 1–124Google Scholar
  2. Bibby CJ, Burgess ND and Hill DA (1992) Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Boesen J and Lafontaine A (1998) Indicators and monitoring of capacity development in environment initiatives. In: Danida and DANCED International Workshop on Danish Assistance to Capacity Development in Environment, Snekkersten, Denmark 12–14 May 1998, Workshop Proceedings, pp 96–130. Danida and DANCED, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown D (1998) Participatory biodiversity conservation rethinking the strategy in the low tourist potential areas of tropical Africa. ODI Natural Resource Perspectives 33: 1–5Google Scholar
  5. Brown M and Wyckoff-Baird B (1992) Designing Integrated Conservation and Development Projects. Biodiversity Support Program. WWF, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP and Laake JL (1993) Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP and Anderson DR (1984) The need for distance data in transect counts. Journal of Wildlife Management 48: 1248–1254Google Scholar
  8. Coddington JA, Griswold CE, Dávila DS, Pe ñaranda E and Larcher SF (1991) Designing and testing sampling protocols to estimate biodiversity in tropical ecosystems. In: Dudley EC (ed) The Unity of Evolutionary Biology: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, pp 44–60. Dioscorides Press, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  9. Dallmeier F and Comiskey JA (eds) (1998) Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modeling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies. Parthenon Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Danielsen F and Enghoff M (1999) Fredet natur-mellem udnyttelse og beskyttelse. Den Ny Verden 32 (4): 74–81Google Scholar
  11. DENR (1992) National Integrated Protected Area System Act R.A. No. 7586 and Implementing Rules and Regulations DAO 25, Series of 1992. DENR, PAWB, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  12. DENR (1998) Medium Term Development Plan for the Protected Area and Wildlife Sector of DENR 1999–2004. DENR, Quezon City, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  13. DENR and UNEP (1997) Philippine Biodiversity. An Assessment and Action Plan. Bookmark, Inc., Makati City, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuller J (1998) Participatory monitoring of forest resources: current methodologies being developed in Thailand. Rural Development Forestry Network 23e: 23–27Google Scholar
  15. Gerrodette T (1987) A power analysis for detecting trends. Ecology 68: 1364–1372Google Scholar
  16. Gerrodette T (1991) Models for power of detecting trends-a reply to Link and Hatfield. Ecology 72: 1889–1892Google Scholar
  17. Groombridge B (ed) (1992) Global Biodiversity. Status of the Earth's Living Resources. World Conservation Monitoring Center. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Groombridge B and Jenkins MD (eds) (1996) Assessing Biodiversity Status and Sustainability. WCMC Biodiversity Series No. 5. World Conservation Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Harmon D (1994) Coordinating Research andManagement to Enhance Protected Areas. IUCN, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Hammond A, Adriaanse A, Rodenburg E, Bryant D and Woodward R (1995) Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Hellier A, Newton AC and Gaona SO (1999) Use of indigenous knowledge for rapidly assessing trends in biodiversity: a case study from Chiapas, Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 869–889Google Scholar
  22. IBAMA (1998) International Workshop on Biodiversity Monitoring in Federal Protected Areas: Observations and General Remarks. www.erols.com/dsbaker/Google Scholar
  23. IUCN (1996) 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  24. Kremen C, Merenlender AM and Murphy DD (1994) Ecological monitoring: a vital need for integrated conservation and development programs in the tropics. Conservation Biology 8: 388–397Google Scholar
  25. Kremen C, Raymond I and Lance K (1998) An interdisciplinary tool for monitoring conservation impacts in Madagascar. Conservation Biology 12: 549–563Google Scholar
  26. Laake JL, Buckland ST, Anderson DR and Burnham KP (1993) Distance User's Guide, v. 2.0. Colorado Cooperation of Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado State University, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  27. Margules CR, Austin MP, Davies KF, Meyers JA and Nicholls AO (1998) The design of programs to monitor forest biodiversity: lessons from theWogWog habitat fragmentation experiment. In: Dallmeier F and Comiskey JA (eds) Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modelling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies, pp 183–196. Parthenon Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  28. Margoulis R and Salafsky N (1998) Measures of Success: A Systematic Approach to Designing, Managing and Monitoring Community-Oriented Conservation Projects. Adaptive Management Series, Biodiversity Support Program, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. Nordeco and DENR (1998a) Biodiversity Monitoring System Manual. DENR, Manila; Nordeco, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  30. Nordeco and DENR (1998b) Integrating Conservation and Development in Protected Area Management in Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, the Philippines. DENR, Manila; Nordeco, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  31. Nordeco and DENR (1998c) Integrating Conservation and Development in Protected Area Management in Bataan Natural Park, the Philippines. DENR, Manila; Nordeco, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  32. Nordeco and DENR (1998d) Integrating Conservation and Development in Protected Area Management in Mt. Kitanglad Range Natural Park, the Philippines. DENR, Manila; Nordeco, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  33. Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4: 355–364Google Scholar
  34. OECD/DAC (1997) Capacity Development in Environment: Proceedings of a Workshop held in Rome, Italy, 4–6 December, 1996. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. PAWB-DENR (1998) The First Philippine National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity. PAWB-DENR, Quezon City, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  36. Pollisco-Botengan MA (1997) CPPAP Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Framework. DENR and NIPA, Inc., ManilaGoogle Scholar
  37. Pollisco W, Danielsen F, Nozawa C, Jensen A and Balete D (1997) Proceedings of Workshop on Monitoring Biodiversity in Protected Areas of the Philippines. SYLVATROP The Technical Journal of Philippine Ecosystems and Natural Resources 7: 101–104Google Scholar
  38. Saberwal VK and Kothari A (1996) The human dimension in conservation biology curricula in developing countries. Conservation Biology 10: 1328–1331Google Scholar
  39. Schaik CP van, Terborgh T and Dugelby B (1997) The silent crisis: the state of rain forest nature preserves. In: Kramer R, Schaik CP van and Johnson J (eds) Last Stand: Protected Areas & the Defense of Tropical Biodiversity. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management pass é in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83: 247–257Google Scholar
  41. Thompson WL, White GC and Gowan C (1998) Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  42. Vora RS (1997) Developing programs to monitor ecosystem health and effectiveness of management practices on Lakes States National Forests, USA. Biological Conservation 80: 289–302Google Scholar
  43. Wangwacharakul V, Claridge G and Mather R (1996) Biodiversity Monitoring and Evaluation in the Lao PDR: Developing a Protected Area Approach. MIDAS Agronomics Co. Ltd., BangkokGoogle Scholar
  44. Weber FR (1990) Preliminary Indicators for Monitoring Changes in the Natural Resource Base. A.I.D. Program Design Evaluation Methodology No. 14. USAID, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  45. Wells MP (1998) Institutions and incentives for biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 815–835Google Scholar
  46. Wilson JG (1994) The Role of Bio-indicators in Estuarine Management. Estuaries 17: 94–101Google Scholar
  47. Wilson DE, Cole FR, Nichols JD, Rudran R and Foster MS (eds) (1996) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. World Bank (1992) Guidelines for Monitoring and Evaluation of GEF Biodiversity Projects. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  49. World Bank (1998) Guidelines for Monitoring and Evaluation for Biodiversity Projects. Environment Department Note No. 65. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  50. WRI, UNEP, UNDP and WB (1998) World Resources 1998–99, pp 320–321. Oxford University Press, New York, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Finn Danielsen
    • 1
  • Danilo S. Balete
    • 2
  • Michael K. Poulsen
    • 1
  • Martin Enghoff
    • 1
  • Cristi M. Nozawa
    • 2
  • Arne E. Jensen
    • 1
  1. 1.NORDECO (Nordic Agency for Development and Ecology)CopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau (PAWB) and NIPA (NGOs for Integrated Protected Areas, Inc.)Ninoy Aquino Parks and Wildlife CenterQuezon City, Metro ManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations