Journal of Global Optimization

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 367–383

Global Optimization on Funneling Landscapes

  • Robert H. Leary
Article

Abstract

Molecular conformation problems arising in computational chemistry require the global minimization of a non-convex potential energy function representing the interactions of, for example, the component atoms in a molecular system. Typically the number of local minima on the potential energy surface grows exponentially with system size, and often becomes enormous even for relatively modestly sized systems. Thus the simple multistart strategy of randomly sampling local minima becomes impractical. However, for many molecular conformation potential energy surfaces the local minima can be organized by a simple adjacency relation into a single or at most a small number of funnels. A distinguished local minimum lies at the bottom of each funnel and a monotonically descending sequence of adjacent local minima connects every local minimum in the funnel with the funnel bottom. Thus the global minimum can be found among the comparatively small number of funnel bottoms, and a multistart strategy based on sampling funnel bottoms becomes viable. In this paper we present such an algorithm of the basin-hopping type and apply it to the Lennard–Jones cluster problem, an intensely studied molecular conformation problem which has become a benchmark for global optimization algorithms. Results of numerical experiments are presented which confirm both the multifunneling character of the Lennard–Jones potential surface as well as the efficiency of the algorithm. The algorithm has found all of the current putative global minima in the literature up to 110 atoms, as well as discovered a new global minimum for the 98-atom cluster of a novel geometrical class.

Global optimization Lennard–Jones clusters Basin-hopping Energy landscape Folding funnel Molecular conformation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barron, C., Gomez, S. and Romero, D. (1996), Archimedean poplyhedron structure yields a lower energy atomic cluster, Applied Mathematics Letters 9: 75-78.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, R.S. and Breitengraser-Kunz, R.E. (1995), Topography and dynamics of multidimensional interatomic potential surfaces, Physical Review Letters 74: 3951-3954.Google Scholar
  3. Bryngelson, J.D. Onuchic, J.N., Socci, N.D. and Wolynes, P.G. (1995), Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 21: 167-195.Google Scholar
  4. Deaven, D.M., Tit, N., Morris, J.R. and Ho, K.M. (1996), Structural optimization of Lennard-Jones clusters by a genetic algorithm, Chemical Physics Letters 256: 195-198.Google Scholar
  5. Doye, J.P.K., Wales, D.J. and Berry, R.S. (1995), The effect of the range of the potential on the structure of clusters, Journal of Chemical Physics 103: 4234-4249.Google Scholar
  6. Doye, J.P.K., Miller, M.A. and Wales, D.J., (1999a), The double-funnel energy landscape of the 38-atom Lennard-Jones cluster, Journal of Chemical Physics 110: 6896-6906.Google Scholar
  7. Doye, J.P.K., Miller, M.A. and Wales, D.J., (1999b), Evolution of the potential energy surface with size for Lennard-Jones clusters, Journal of Chemical Physics 111: 8417-8428.Google Scholar
  8. Hoare, M.R. and Pal, P. (1971), Physical cluster mechanics: statics and energy surfaces for monatomic systems, Advances in Physics 20: 161-196.Google Scholar
  9. Kostrowicki, J., Piela, J., Cherayil, B.J. and Scheraga, H.A. (1991), Performance of the diffusion equation method in searches for optimum structures of Lennard-Jones atoms, Journal of Physical Chemistry 95: 4113-4119.Google Scholar
  10. Leary, R.H. (1997), Global optima of Lennard-Jones clusters, Journal of Global Optimization 11: 35-53.Google Scholar
  11. Leary, R.H. and Doye, J.P.K. (1999), Tetrahedral global minimum for the 98-atom Lennard-Jones cluster, Physical Review E 60: R6320-R6322.Google Scholar
  12. Li, Z. and Scheraga, H.A. (1987), Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple minima problem, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 84: 6611-6615.Google Scholar
  13. Locatelli, M. and Schoen, F. (1999), Fast global optimization of diffficult Lennard-Jones clusters (submitted).Google Scholar
  14. Luenberger, D.G. (1969), Optimization by Vector Space Methods, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Mackay, A.L. (1962), A dense non-crystallographic packing of equal spheres, Acta Crystallographica 15: 916-918.Google Scholar
  16. Neumaier, A. (1997), Molecular modeling of proteins and mathematical prediction of protein structure, SIAM Review 39: 407-460.Google Scholar
  17. Niesse, J.A. and Mayne, H.R. (1996), Genetic algorithms for structural cluster optimization, Journal of Chemical Physics 105: 6129-6137.Google Scholar
  18. Northby, J.A. (1987), Structure and binding of Lennard-Jones clusters: 13 ⩽ N ⩽ 147, Journal of Chemical Physics 87: 6166-6178.Google Scholar
  19. Pillardy, J. and Piela, L. (1995), Molecular dynamics on deformed potential energy hypersurfaces, Journal of Physical Chemistry 99: 11805-11812.Google Scholar
  20. Stillinger, F.H. (1999), Exponential multiplicity of inherent structures, Physical Review E 59: 48-51.Google Scholar
  21. Tsai, C.J. and Jordan, K.D. (1993), Use of an eigenmode method to locate the stationary points on the potential energy surfaces of selected argon and water clusters, Journal of Physical Chemistry 97: 11227-11237.Google Scholar
  22. Wales, D.J. (1999), personal communication.Google Scholar
  23. Wales, D.J. and Doye, J.P.K. (1997), Global optimization by basin-hopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard-Jones clusters containing up to 110 atoms, Journal of Physical Chemistry A 101: 5111-5116.Google Scholar
  24. Wales, D.J., Doye, J.P.K., Dullweber, A. and Naumkin, F.Y. (URL), The Cambridge Cluster Database, URL htp://brian.ch.cam.ac.uk/CCD.htmlGoogle Scholar
  25. Wales, D.J. and Scheraga, H.A. (1999), Global optimization of clusters, crystals, and biomolecules, Science 285: 1368-1372.Google Scholar
  26. Wille, L.T. (1987), Minimum-energy configurations of atomic clusters: new results obtained by simulated annealing, Chemical Physics Letters 133: 404-410.Google Scholar
  27. Wolf, M.D. and Landman, U., (1998), Genetic algorithms for structural cluster optimizati9on, Journal of Physical Chemistry A 102: 6129-6137.Google Scholar
  28. Xue, G.L. (1993), Parallel two-level simulated annealing, 1993 ACM International Conference on Supercomputing, ACM Press, 357-366.Google Scholar
  29. Xue, G.L. (1994a), Molecular conformation on the CM-5 by parallel two-level simulated annealing, Journal of Global Optimization 4: 187-208.Google Scholar
  30. Xue, G.L. (1994b), Improvement of the Northby algorithm for molecular conformation: better solutions, Journal of Global Optimization 4: 425-440.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. Leary
    • 1
  1. 1.San Diego Supercomputer CenterUniversity of California, San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations