Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 137–147 | Cite as

Psychometric Properties of the Long and Short Versions of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Core Beliefs Among Bulimic and Comparison Women

  • Glenn Waller
  • Caroline Meyer
  • Vartouhi Ohanian
Article

Abstract

Young's Schema Questionnaire is a potentially valuable clinical and research tool for the investigation of core beliefs and has been well validated. However, at 205 items it is comparatively unwieldy. A briefer, 75-item version has recently been produced by Young, but lacks the psychometric validation that would demonstrate its utility relative to the longer version. The present study aimed to determine whether the long and short versions of the Schema Questionnaire have comparable psychometric properties among a clinical group of bulimics and a comparison group. The two forms had similar levels of internal consistency, and parallel forms reliability and discriminant validity, and their levels of clinical utility were broadly comparable. These findings support the use of the more convenient 75-item version of this questionnaire in clinical and research settings since its psychometric properties are similar to those of the long version. However, these results require replication with other clinical groups.

core beliefs Schema Questionnaire bulimia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Arnow, B., Kenardy, J., & Agras, W. S. (1992). Binge-eating among the obese: A descriptive study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 155–170.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, J. (1996). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. In: P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 165–181). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fairburn, C. G. (1997). Eating disorders. In D. M. Clark & C. G. Fairburn (Eds.), Science and practice of cognitive behaviour therapy (pp. 209–241). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Garner, D. M., Vitousek, K. M., & Pike, K. M. (1997). Cognitive- behavioural therapy for anorexia bulimia nervosa. In D. M. Garner & P. E. Garfinkel (Eds.), Handbook of treatment for eating disorders (2nd ed., pp. 94–144).New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Heatherton, T. F., & Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Binge eating as an escape from self-awareness. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 86–108.Google Scholar
  8. Kennerley, H. (1997, July). Managing complex eating disorders using schema-based cognitive therapy. Paper presented at the British Association of Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy Conference. Canterbury, U.K.Google Scholar
  9. Kovacs, M., & Beck, A. T. (1978). Maladaptive cognitive structures in depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 525–533.Google Scholar
  10. Lacey, J. H. (1986). Pathogenesis. In L. J. Downey & J. C. Malkin (Eds.), Current approaches: Bulimia nervosa (pp. 17–26). Southampton, England: Duphar.Google Scholar
  11. Layden, M. A., Newman, C. F., Freeman, A., & Morse, S. B. (1993). Cognitive therapy of borderline personality disorder. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Meyer, C., Waller, G., & Waters, A. (1998). Emotional states and bulimic psychopathology. In H. Hoek, J. Treasure, & M. Katzman (Eds.), The integration of neurobiology in the treatment of eating disorders (pp. 263–279). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Padesky, C. A. (1994). Schema change processes in cognitive therapy. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 1, 267–278.Google Scholar
  15. Root, M. P. P., & Fallon, P. (1989). Treating the victimized bulimic. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 90–100.Google Scholar
  16. Schmidt, N. B., Joiner, T. E., Young, J. E., & Telch, M. J. (1995). The SchemaQuestionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 295–321.Google Scholar
  17. Vitousek, K. M. (1996). The current status of cognitive behavioral models of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 383–418). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Waller, G., Ohanian, V., Meyer, C., & Osman, S. (2000). Cognitive content among bulimic women: The role of core beliefs. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28, 235–241.Google Scholar
  19. Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Wilson, G. T., Fairbum, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (1997). Cognitive- behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa. In D. M. Garner & P. E. Garfinkel (Eds.), Handbook of treatment for eating disorders (2nd ed., pp. 67–93). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wood, A., Waller, G., & Gowers, S. (1994). Predictors of eating psychopathology in adolescent girls. European Eating Disorders Review, 2, 6–13.Google Scholar
  22. Young, J. E. (1994). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (2nd ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.Google Scholar
  23. Young, J. E. (1998). The Young Schema Questionnaire: Short form. Available in electronic form at http://.home.sprynet.com/sprynet/schema/ysqsl.htm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn Waller
    • 1
  • Caroline Meyer
    • 2
  • Vartouhi Ohanian
    • 3
  1. 1.University of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.University of WarwickWarwickUK
  3. 3.West Middlesex University Hospital, IsleworthMiddlesexUK

Personalised recommendations