Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 1–22

Distinguishing Dimensions of Anxiety and Depression

  • Jack B. Nitschke
  • Wendy Heller
  • Jennifer C. Imig
  • Roderick P. McDonald
  • Gregory A. Miller
Article

Abstract

Symptom covariation and lack of symptom specificity have proven to be complicating factors in research on the emotional, cognitive, and physiologic characteristics of anxiety and depression. Numerous attempts have been made to investigate the unique and overlapping features of anxiety and depression. Of interest in the present study were potential distinctions among proposed types of anxiety and depression. A variety of self-report measures were administered to 783 college students. Correlational analyses and confirmatory factor analyses converged in suggesting that anxious arousal (somatic anxiety) and anxious apprehension (worry) represent distinct affective dimensions that can be distinguished from depression and negative affect.

anxiety depression anxious arousal anxious apprehension negative affect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, G. (1996). Comorbidity in neurotic disorders: The similarities are more important than the differences. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 3–20). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, V. H., & Borkovec, T. D. (1988). The differential effects of inductions of worry, somatic anxiety, and depression on emotional experience. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 19, 21–26.Google Scholar
  4. Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barlow, D. H. (1991). Disorders of emotion. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 58–71.Google Scholar
  6. Barlow, D. H., Chorpita, B. F., & Turovsky, J. (1996). Fear, panic, anxiety, and disorders of emotion. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 43, 251–328.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Manual for the Revised Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1990). Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 861–865.Google Scholar
  11. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Fit indexes, Lagrange multipliers, constraint changes and incomplete data in structural models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 163–172.Google Scholar
  12. Borkovec, T. D., Robinson, E., Pruzinsky, T., & DePree, J. A. (1983). Preliminary exploration of worry: Some characteristics and processes. Behavior Research and Therapy, 21, 9–16.Google Scholar
  13. Borkovec, T. D., Shadick, R., & Hopkins, M. (1991). The nature of normal and pathological worry. In R. M. Rapee & D. H. Barlow (Eds.), Chronic anxiety, generalized anxiety disorder, and mixed anxiety depression (pp. 29–51). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, T. A., & Chorpita, B. F. (1996). Reply to Andrews. On the validity and comorbidity of the DSM-III-R and DSM-IV anxiety disorders. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 48–52). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Burns, D. D. (1998). Why are depression and anxiety correlated? A test of the tripartite model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 461–473.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Stewart, B. (1990). Cognitive specificity and positive- negative affectivity: Complementary or contradictory views on anxiety and depression? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99,148–155.Google Scholar
  18. Clark, D. A., Cook, A., & Snow, D. (1998). Depressive symptom differences in hospitalized, medically ill, depressed psychiatric inpatients and nonmedical controls. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107,38–48.Google Scholar
  19. Clark, D. A., Steer, R. A., & Beck, A. T. (1994). Common and specific dimensions of self-reported anxiety and depression: Implications for the cognitive and tripartite models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 645–654.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, L. A. (1989). The anxiety and depressive disorders: Descriptive psychopathology and differential diagnosis. In P. C. Kendall & D. Watson (Eds.), Anxiety and depression: Distinctive and overlapping features (pp. 83–129). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991a). General affective dispositions in physical and psychological health. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Donaldson (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology, (pp. 221–245). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991b). Theoretical and empirical issues in differentiating depression from anxiety. In J. Becker & A. Kleinman (Eds.), Psychosocial aspects of depression, (pp. 39–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991c). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.Google Scholar
  24. Darlington, R. B. (1975). Radicals and squares: Statistical methods for the behavioral sciences. New York: Logan Hill Press.Google Scholar
  25. Frankel, A. N., Fresco, D. M., Mennin, D. S., Turk, C. L., & Heimberg, R. G. (1998, November). Distinct and overlapping features of rumination and worry: The relationship of cognitive production to negative affective states. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  26. Fraser, C., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). COSAN: Covariance structure analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 263–265.Google Scholar
  27. Hammen, C. L., & Padesky, C. A. (1977). Sex differences in the expression of depressive responses on the Beck Depression Inventory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 609–614.Google Scholar
  28. Heller, W., & Nitschke, J. B. (1998). The puzzle of regional brain activity in depression and anxiety: The importance of subtypes and comorbidity. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 421–447.Google Scholar
  29. Heller, W., Nitschke, J. B., Etienne, M. A., & Miller, G. A. (1997). Patterns of regional brain activity differentiate types of anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 376–385.Google Scholar
  30. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247–255.Google Scholar
  32. Mennin, D. S., Fresco, D. M., Frankel, A. N., Turk, C. L., & Heimberg, R. G. (1998, August). Relationship of rumination and worry to negative affective states. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  33. Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487–495.Google Scholar
  34. Molina, S., & Borkovec, T. D. (1994). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and associated characteristics. In G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 265–283). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Nitschke, J. B., Heller, W., & Miller, G. A. (1998, May). Psychometric differentiation of affective dimensions: Implications for the tripartite model. In S. J. Catanzaro (Chair), The tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Current research and future prospects. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  36. Nitschke, J. B., Heller, W., & Miller, G. A. (2000). Anxiety, stress, and cortical brain function. In J. C. Borod (Ed.), The neuropsychology of emotion (pp. 298–319). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nitschke, J. B., Heller, W., Palmieri, P. A., & Miller, G. A. (1999). Contrasting patterns of brain activity in anxious apprehension and anxious arousal. Psychophysiology, 36, 628–637.Google Scholar
  38. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1987). Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 259–282.Google Scholar
  39. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569–582.Google Scholar
  40. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). An interactive model for the emergence of gender differences in depression in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 519–534.Google Scholar
  41. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115–121.Google Scholar
  42. Osman, A., Barrios, F. X., Aukes, D., Osman, J. R., & Markway, K. (1993). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: Psychometric properties in a community population. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 15, 287–297.Google Scholar
  43. Schwartz, G. E., Davidson, R. J., & Goleman, D. J. (1978). Patterning of cognitive and somatic processes in the self-regulation of anxiety: Effects of meditation versus exercise. Psychosomatic Medicine, 40, 321–328.Google Scholar
  44. Spielberger, C. D. (1968). Self-evaluation questionnaire. STAI Form X-2. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  45. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  46. Stangler, R. S., & Printz, A. M. (1980). DSM-III: Psychiatric diagnosis in a university population. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 937–940.Google Scholar
  47. Tanaka, J. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Carey, G. (1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 346–353.Google Scholar
  49. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: II. Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 15–25.Google Scholar
  50. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98,219–235.Google Scholar
  51. Watson, D., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Clark, L. A., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 3–14.Google Scholar
  52. Weissman, M. M., Leaf, P. J., Holzer, C. E. I., Myers, J. K., & Tischler, G. L. (1984). The epidemiology of depression: An update on sex differences in rates. Journal of Affective Disorders, 7, 179–188.Google Scholar
  53. York, D., Borkovec, T. D., Vasey, M., & Stern, R. (1987). Effects of worry and somatic anxiety induction on thoughts, emotion and physiological activity. Behavior Research Therapy, 25, 523–526.Google Scholar
  54. Zinbarg, R. E., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Structure of anxiety and the anxiety disorders: A hierarchical model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 181–193.Google Scholar
  55. Zinbarg, R. E., Barlow, D.H., Liebowitz, M., Street, L., Broadhead, E., Katon, W., Roy-Byrne, P., Lepine, J. P., Teherani, M., Richards, J., et al. (1994). The DSM-IV field trial for mixed anxiety- depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1153–1162.Google Scholar
  56. Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1965). Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List. San Diego, CA: EdITS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack B. Nitschke
    • 1
  • Wendy Heller
    • 2
  • Jennifer C. Imig
    • 3
  • Roderick P. McDonald
    • 4
  • Gregory A. Miller
    • 5
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin at MadisonMadison
  2. 2.University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaign
  3. 3.Finch University of Health Sciences/Chicago Medical SchoolNorth Chicago
  4. 4.University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaign
  5. 5.University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaign

Personalised recommendations