Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 733–755 | Cite as

An Idea Ahead of Its Time: The History and Development of Soft Systems Methodology

  • John Mingers
Article

Abstract

This paper, part of the Festschrift for Peter Checkland, provides an outline of the history and development of soft systems methodology. It includes a personal reflection on my experiences of SSM, as well as a more objective evaluation of its achievements and limitations.

development of soft systems methodology Peter Checkland SSM 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, F., and Eden, C., et al. (1997). Modeling for litigation: mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches. Interfaces 27(2), 48–65.Google Scholar
  2. Ackoff, R. (1977). Optimizing + objectivity = opt out. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 1(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  3. Ackoff, R. (1979a). The future of operational research is past. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 30, 93–104.Google Scholar
  4. Ackoff, R. (1979b). Resurrecting the future of operational research. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 30, 189–199.Google Scholar
  5. Ackoff, R. (1982). On the hard-headedness and soft-heartedness of M. C. Jackson. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 31–33.Google Scholar
  6. Ackoff, R., and Emery, F. (1972). On Purposeful Systems, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  7. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman Hall, London.Google Scholar
  8. Atkinson, C. J., and Checkland, P. B. (1988). Extending the metaphor system. Hum. Relat. 41(10), 709–724.Google Scholar
  9. Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Granada, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
  10. Beer, S. (1966). Decision and Control, Wiley, London.Google Scholar
  11. Beer, S. (1972). The Brain of the Firm, Penguin Press, London.Google Scholar
  12. Bennett, J., and Worthington, D. (1998). An example of a good but partially successful OR engagement: Improving outpatient clinic operations. Interfaces 28(5), 56–69.Google Scholar
  13. Bennett, L. M., and Kerr, M. A. (1996). A systems approach to the implementation of total quality management. Total Qual. Manage. 7(6), 631–665.Google Scholar
  14. Bennett, P. (1994). Designing a Parliamentary briefing system—An OR look at the Commons. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 45(11), 1221–1232.Google Scholar
  15. Bhaskar, R. (1978). A Realist Theory of Science, Harvester, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  16. Billman, B., and Courtney, J. F. (1993). Automated discovery in managerial problem formulation—Formation of causal hypotheses for cognitive mapping. Decis. Sci. 24(1), 23–41.Google Scholar
  17. Boardman, J. T., and Cole, A. J. (1996). Integrated process improvement in design and manufacture using a systems approach. IEEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. 143(2), 171–185.Google Scholar
  18. Bolton, R., and Gold, J. (1994). Career management—Matching the needs of individuals with the needs of organizations. Personnel Rev. 23(1), 6–24.Google Scholar
  19. Brocklesby, J. (1995). Using soft systems methodology to identify competence requirements in HRM. Int. J. Manpower 16(5—6), 70.Google Scholar
  20. Brocklesby, J., and Cummings, S. (1996). Designing a viable organization structure. Long Range Plan. 29(1), 49–57.Google Scholar
  21. Brown, J. R., and Macleod, N. D. (1996). Integrating ecology into natural resource management policy. Environ. Manage. 20(3), 289–296.Google Scholar
  22. Brown, S. M. (1992). Cognitive mapping and repertory grids for qualitative survey research—Some comparative observations. J. Manage. Stud. 29(3), 297–307.Google Scholar
  23. Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  24. Calori, R., and Johnson, G., et al. (1994). CEOs' cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Manage. J. 15(6), 437–457.Google Scholar
  25. Checkland, P. (1969). Systems and Science, Industry and Innovation, Lancaster University, Lancaster.Google Scholar
  26. Checkland, P. (1972). Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem solving. J. Syst. Eng. 3(2), 87–116.Google Scholar
  27. Checkland, P. (1975). The development of systems thinking by systems practice—A methodology from an action research program. In Trappl, R., and Hanika, F. (eds.), Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research, Hemisphere, Washington, DC, Vol. II, pp. 278–283.Google Scholar
  28. Checkland, P. (1976a). Science and the systems paradigm. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 3, 127–134.Google Scholar
  29. Checkland, P. (1976b). Using a systems approach: The structure of root definitions. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 5(1), 75–83.Google Scholar
  30. Checkland, P. (1978). The origins and nature of “hard” systems thinking. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 5(2), 99–110.Google Scholar
  31. Checkland, P. (1979a). The shape of the systems movement. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 6, 129–135.Google Scholar
  32. Checkland, P. (1979b). Techniques in “soft” systems practice 1: Systems diagrams some tentative guidelines. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 6, 33–39.Google Scholar
  33. Checkland, P. (1979c). Techniques in “soft” systems practice part 2: Building conceptual models. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 6, 41–49.Google Scholar
  34. Checkland, P. (1980). The systems movement and the “failure” of management science. Cybernet. Syst. 11, 317–324.Google Scholar
  35. Checkland, P. (1981a). Rethinking a systems approach. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 8, 3–14.Google Scholar
  36. Checkland, P. (1981b). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  37. Checkland, P. (1982). Soft systems methodology as process: A reply to M. C. Jackson. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 37–39.Google Scholar
  38. Checkland, P. (1983). OR and the systems movement—Mappings and conflicts. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 34(8), 661–675.Google Scholar
  39. Checkland, P. (1985a). Achieving “desirable” and “feasible” change: An application of soft systems methodology. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 36, 821–831.Google Scholar
  40. Checkland, P. (1985b). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 36(9), 757–768.Google Scholar
  41. Checkland, P. (1998a). The case for “holon.” Syst. Pract. 1(3), 235–238.Google Scholar
  42. Checkland, P. (1988b). Soft systems methodology: An overview. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 15, 27–30.Google Scholar
  43. Checkland, P. (1989a). An application of soft systems methodology. In Rosenhead, J. (ed.), Problematic World, Wiley, Chichester, London, pp. 101–120.Google Scholar
  44. Checkland, P. (1989b). Soft systems methodology. In Rosenhead, J. (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, Wiley, Chichester, London, pp. 71–100.Google Scholar
  45. Checkland, P. (1993). Response. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 44(6), 634.Google Scholar
  46. Checkland, P. (1994). Conventional wisdom and conventional ignorance: The revolution organization theory missed. Organization 1(1), 29–34.Google Scholar
  47. Checkland, P., and Davies, L. (1986). The use of the term Weltanschauung in soft systems methodology. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 13, 109–115.Google Scholar
  48. Checkland, P., and Griffin, R. (1970). Management information systems: A systems view. J. Syst. Eng. 1(1), 29–42.Google Scholar
  49. Checkland, P., and Holwell, S. (1998). Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  50. Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  51. Checkland, P., and Tsouvalis, C. (1997). Reflecting on SSM: The link between root definitions and conceptual models. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 14(3), 153–168.Google Scholar
  52. Checkland, P., and Wilson, B. (1980). “Primary task” and “issue-based” root definitions in systems studies. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 7, 51–55.Google Scholar
  53. Checkland, P., Forbes, P., and Martin, S. (1990). Techniques in soft systems practice part 3: Monitoring and control in conceptual models and evaluation studies. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 17, 29–37.Google Scholar
  54. Churchman, C. W. (1968). The Systems Approach, Dell, New York.Google Scholar
  55. Churchman, C. W. (1982). Reply to M. C. Jackson. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 35–36.Google Scholar
  56. Coyle, R. G., and Alexander, M. D. W. (1997). Two approaches to qualitative modeling of a nation's drugs trade. Syst. Dynam. Rev. 13(3), 205–222.Google Scholar
  57. Daellenbach, H. (1994). Systems and Decision Making, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  58. Dickover, N. (1994). Reflection in action—Modeling a specific organization through the viable systems model. Syst. Pract. 7(1), 43–62.Google Scholar
  59. Eden, C., Jones, S., and Sirus, D. (1983). Messing About in Problems, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  60. Fielden, D., and Jacques, J. K. (1988). Systemic approach to energy rationalisation in island communities. Int. J. Energy Res. 22(2), 107–129.Google Scholar
  61. Flood, R. (1993). Checkland and scholarship—the need to do better—Response. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 44(6), 634.Google Scholar
  62. Friend, J., and Hickling, A. (1987). Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  63. Friend, J., and Jessop, N. (1977). Local Government and Strategic Choice, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  64. Galliers, R. (1993). Towards a flexible information architecture: Integrating business strategies and business process redesign. J. Inf. Syst. 3, 199–213.Google Scholar
  65. Galliers, R., Mingers, J., and Jackson, M. (1997). Organization theory and systems thinking: The benefits of partnership. Organization 4(2), 269–278.Google Scholar
  66. Gough, J. D., and Ward, J. C. (1996). Environmental decision making and lake management. J. Environ. Manage. 48(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  67. Gregory, A. J., and Jackson, M. C. (1992). Evaluating organizations—A systems and contingency approach. Syst. Pract. 5(1), 37–60.Google Scholar
  68. Habermas, J. (1978). Knowledge and Human Interests, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  69. Haynes, M. G., and McGregor, A. G., et al. (1997). The business team standard: A means of improving the effectiveness of individual businesses in a multibusiness corporation. Syst. Pract. 10(3), 219–239.Google Scholar
  70. Hindle, T., and Checkland, P., et al. (1995). Development of a methodology for multidisciplinary action research—A case-study. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 46(4), 453–464.Google Scholar
  71. Jackson, M. (1982). The nature of soft systems thinking: The work of Churchman, Ackoff, and Checkland. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 17–27.Google Scholar
  72. Jackson, M. (1993). Politics or scholarship: A response to Checkland. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 44(6), 631–632.Google Scholar
  73. Kartowisastro, H., and Kijima, K. (1994). An enriched soft systems methodology (SSM) and its application to cultural-conflict under a paternalistic value system. Syst. Pract. 73(3), 241–253.Google Scholar
  74. Kennedy, B. (1996). Soft systems methodology in applying psychology. Austral. Psychol. 31(1), 52–59.Google Scholar
  75. Khisty, C. J. (1995). Soft systems methodology as learning and management tool. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 121(3), 91–107.Google Scholar
  76. Knowles, J. (1993). A soft systems analysis of a CD-Rom network for a multisite polytechnic. J. Librarian. Inform. Sci. 25(1), 15–21.Google Scholar
  77. Lartindrake, J. M., and Curran, C. R. (1996). All together now—The circular organization in a university hospital. Syst. Pract. 9(5), 391–401.Google Scholar
  78. Ledington, P. (1992). Intervention and the management process—An action-based research study. Syst. Pract. 5(1), 17–36.Google Scholar
  79. Ledington, P., and Donaldson, J. (1997). Soft OR and management practice: A study of the adoption and use of soft systems methodology. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 48(3), 229–240.Google Scholar
  80. Lee, S., Courtney, J. F., et al. (1992). A system for organizational learning using cognitive maps. Omega 20(1), 23–36.Google Scholar
  81. Lehaney, B., and Hlupic, V. (1995). Simulation modeling for resource allocation and planning in the health sector. J. Roy. Soc. Health 115(6), 382–385.Google Scholar
  82. Lehaney, B., and Paul, R. J. (1994). Using soft systems methodology to develop a simulation of outpatient services. J. Roy. Soc. Health 114(5), 248–251.Google Scholar
  83. Lehaney, B., and Paul, R. J. (1996). The use of soft systems methodology in the development of a simulation of outpatient services at Watford General Hospital. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 47(7), 864–870.Google Scholar
  84. Macadam, R., and Vanasch, R., et al. (1995). A case study in development planning using a systems learning approach—Generating a master plan for the livestock sector in Nepal. Agr. Syst. 49(3), 299–323.Google Scholar
  85. Maciaschapula, C. A. (1995). Development of a soft systems model to identify information values, impact and barriers in a health-care information system. J. Inform. Sci. 21(4), 283–288.Google Scholar
  86. Magidson, J. (1992). Systems practice in several communities in Philadelphia. Syst. Pract. 5(5), 493–508.Google Scholar
  87. Midgley, G., and Milne, A. (1995). Creating employment opportunities for people with mental health problems—A feasibility study for new initiatives. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 46(1), 35–42.Google Scholar
  88. Millspacko, P. A., and Wilson, K., et al. (1991). Highlights from the use of the soft systems methodology to improve agrotechnology transfer in Kona, Hawaii. Agri. Syst. 36(4), 409–425.Google Scholar
  89. Mingers, J. (1980). Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and soft systems methodology. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 7 (April), 41–50.Google Scholar
  90. Mingers, J. (1984). Subjectivism and soft systems methodology—A critique. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 11, 85–103.Google Scholar
  91. Mingers, J. (1988). Soft systems methodology and information systems—A comparison of conceptual models and data flow diagrams. Comput. J. 31(4), 376–379.Google Scholar
  92. Mingers, J. (1989). Problems of measurement. In Jackson, M., Keys, P., and Cropper, S. (eds.), Operational Research and the Social Sciences, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 471–477.Google Scholar
  93. Mingers, J. (1990). The what/how distinction and conceptual models: A reappraisal. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 17, 21–28.Google Scholar
  94. Mingers, J. (1997). Towards critical pluralism. In Mingers, J., and Gill, A. (eds.), Multimethodology: Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, Wiley, Chichester, Wiley, pp. 407–440.Google Scholar
  95. Mingers, J. (2000a). Critical Realism as the Underpinning Philosophy for OR/MS and Systems, J. Operat. Res. Soc. 51 (in press).Google Scholar
  96. Mingers, J. (2000b). Variety is the spice of life: Combining soft and hard OR/MS methods. Int. Trans. Operat. Res. 7, 673–691.Google Scholar
  97. Mingers, J., and Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega 25(5), 489–509.Google Scholar
  98. Mingers, J., and Gill, A. (eds.), (1997). Multimethodology: Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  99. Mingers, J., and Taylor, S. (1992). The use of soft systems methodology in practice. J. Operat. Res. 43(4), 321–332.Google Scholar
  100. Munro, I., and Mingers, J. (2000). The use of multimethodology in practice—results of a survey of practitioners. Warwick Business School Research Paper 337, Warwick University, Coventry.Google Scholar
  101. Nakano, M., Nobutomo, H., et al. (1997). Research on how to develop R&D strategies using the soft systems approach. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 14(6—8), 822–833.Google Scholar
  102. O'Connor, A. D. (1992). Soft systems methodology—A case-study of its use within an Australian organization. Austral. Comput. J. 24(4), 130–138.Google Scholar
  103. Ormerod, R. (1996a). Information systems strategy development at Sainsbury's supermarkets using “soft” OR. Interfaces 26(1), 102–130.Google Scholar
  104. Ormerod, R. (1996b). Putting soft OR methods to work—Information systems strategy development at Richards Bay. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 47(9), 1083–1097.Google Scholar
  105. Ormerod, R. (1998a). Putting soft OR methods to work: Information systems strategy development at Palabora. Omega 26(1), 75–98.Google Scholar
  106. Ormerod, R. (1998b). Putting Soft OR methods to work: The case of the business improvement project at Powergen. European J. Operat. Res. 118, 1–29.Google Scholar
  107. Pauley, G., and Ormerod, R. (1998). The evolution of a performance measurement project at RTZ. Interfaces 28, 94–118.Google Scholar
  108. Pidd, M. (1996). Tools for Thinking: Modelling in Management Science, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  109. Platt, D. G. (1996). Building process models for design management. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 10(3), 194–203.Google Scholar
  110. Popper, R., Andino, K., et al. (1996). Knowledge and beliefs regarding agricultural pesticides in rural Guatemala. Environ. Manage. 20(2), 241–248.Google Scholar
  111. Rasegard, S. (1991). A comparative-study of Beer and Miller systems designs as tools when analyzing the structure of a municipal organization. Behav. Sci. 36(2), 83–99.Google Scholar
  112. Robbins, L. (1994). Using interactive planning in the entrepreneurial class—A live fieldwork-based case and simulation exercise. Simulat. Gaming 25(3), 353–367.Google Scholar
  113. Schuhman, W. (1990). Strategy for information systems in the film division of Hoechst AG. Syst. Pract. 3(3), 265–287.Google Scholar
  114. Stowell, F. (1989). Change, Organisation, Power, and the Metahpor “Commodity,” Systems Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster.Google Scholar
  115. Stowell, F. (ed.) (1995). Information Systems Provision: The Contribution of Soft Systems Methodology, McGraw—Hill, London.Google Scholar
  116. Strumpfer, J. P. (1997). Planning as a means of social change: The Durban functional region forum case. Syst. Pract. 10(5), 549–566.Google Scholar
  117. Thoren, M. (1996). Systems approach to clothing for disabled users—Why is it difficult for disabled users to find suitable clothing. Appl. Ergon. 27(6), 389–396.Google Scholar
  118. Tsouvalis, C., and Checkland, P. (1996). Reflecting on SSM: The dividing line between “real-world” and “systems thinking world,” Syst. Res. 13(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
  119. Ulengin, F., and Topcu, I. (1997). Cognitive map: KBDSS, integration in transportation planning. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 48(11), 1065–1075.Google Scholar
  120. Vickers, G. (1965). The Art of Judgement, Harper Row, London.Google Scholar
  121. Vos, B., and Akkermans, H. (1996). Capturing the dynamics of facility allocation. Int. J. Operat. Product. Manage. 16(11), 57.Google Scholar
  122. Walker, J. (1990). Diagnosis and implementation: How a large cooperative employed a series of proposals for restructuring based on the viable systems model. Syst. Pract. 3(5), 441–451.Google Scholar
  123. Weiner, N. (1950). The Human Use of Human Beings, Houghton Mifflin, New York.Google Scholar
  124. Wells, J. S. G. (1995). Discontent without focus—An analysis of nurse management and activity on a psychiatric inpatient facility using a soft systems approach. J. Adv. Nurs. 21(2), 214–221.Google Scholar
  125. Winch, G. W. (1993). Consensus building in the planning process—Benefits from a hard modeling approach. Syst. Dynam. Rev. 9(3), 287–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Mingers
    • 1
  1. 1.Warwick Business SchoolWarwick UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations