Erkenntnis

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 353–374 | Cite as

Ockham's Razor and the Anti-Superfluity Principle

  • E. C. Barnes
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Darden, L.: 1991, Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Edwards, P. (ed.): 1967, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 4, Macmillan The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Forster, M. and E. Sober: 1994, ‘How to Tell when Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, 1–35.Google Scholar
  4. Friedman, M.: 1983, Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  5. Garber, D.: 1983, ‘Old Evidence and Logical Omniscience in Bayesian Confirmation Theory’, in J. Earman (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  6. Humphreys, P.: 1989, The Chances of Explanation, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  7. Kitcher, P.: 1993, The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Lange, M.: 1995, ‘Spearman's Principle’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 503–52.Google Scholar
  9. Newton, I.: 1953, Newton's Philosophy of Nature: Selections from his Writings, Haffner, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Nolan, D.: 1997, ‘Quantitative Parsimony’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48, 329–343.Google Scholar
  11. Quine, W.: 1966, ‘On Simple Theories of a Complex World’, in W. Quine (ed.), The Ways of Paradox, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Russell, B.: 1951, Mysticism and Logic, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  13. Russell, B.: 1959, My Philosophical Development, Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Salmon, W.: 1984, Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  15. Schapin, S. and S. Schaeffer: 1985, Leviathan and the Air Pump, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  16. Sober, E.: 1975, Simplicity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Sober, E.: 1981, ‘The Principle of Parsimony’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32, 145–156.Google Scholar
  18. Sober, E.: 1988, Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Sober, E.: 1990, ‘Let's Razor Ockham's Razor’, in D. Knowles (ed.), Explanation and its Limits, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Sober, E.: 1996, ‘Parsimony and Predictive Equivalence’, Erkenntnis 44, 167–197.Google Scholar
  21. Walsh, D.: 1979, ‘Occam's Razor: A Principle of Intellectual Elegance’, American Philosophical Quarterly 16, 241–244.Google Scholar
  22. Walton, D.: 1992, ‘Nonfallacious Arguments from Ignorance’, American Philosophical Quarterly 29, 381–387.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. C. Barnes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySouthern Methodist UniversityDallasU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations