The Urban Review

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 313–341 | Cite as

Democratic Communities and Business/Education “Partnerships” in Secondary Education

  • Kathleen Knight Abowitz


Democratic ideals of equality, freedom, and common problem-solving help ensure that schools are governed as communities, in Dewey's sense of the term, wherein all members share in defining the purposes and processes of the group. In this paper, qualitative case study data of a business–public school partnership is examined in order to describe, analyze, and evaluate this partnership based upon democratic criteria established by Deweyan pragmatism. The analysis of the business/education partnership enables educators to better understand the potential for, and inhibitors of, the kind of genuine social growth among school and corporate partners that can serve public agendas rather than private profits.

business partnerships pragmatism John Dewey community 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Apple, M. W. (1994). Is change always good for teachers? Gender class and teaching in history. In K. M. Borman and N. P. Greenman (eds.), Changing American Education: Recapturing the Past or Inventing the Future? (pp. 71–106). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  2. Ascher, C. (1988). Urban School-Community Alliances: Trends and Issues, No. 10. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
  3. Berenbeim, R. E. (1991). Corporate Support of National Education Goals. New York: Conference Board.Google Scholar
  4. Berman, E. H. (1988). Civic education in the corporatized classroom. Theory into Practice 27(Autumn): 288–295.Google Scholar
  5. Biesta, G. (1995). Pragmatism as a project of communicative action. In J. Garrison (ed.), The New Scholarship on Dewey (pp. 105–122). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  6. Borman, K. M., and Obermiller, P. J. (1994). From Mountain to Metropolis: Appalachian Migrants in American Cities. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  7. Boydston, J. A. (ed.) (1980). John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899– 1924, Vol. 10: 1916–1917). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boyles, D. (1998). American Education and Corporations: The Free Market Goes to School. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  9. Business and the Reshaping of Public Education (1990). Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  10. Choin-Kenney, L. (1989). America' Leaders Speak Out on Business-Education Partnerships: Proceedings and Recommendations from the Compact Institute/Business Leadership Forum. Washington, DC: National Alliance of Business.Google Scholar
  11. DeBlois, R. (1989). Taking a cue from business—Schools can become more responsive. NASSP Bulletin 73 (February): 15–21.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and Nature. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.Google Scholar
  15. Edelstein, F. S. (1989). A Blueprint for Business on Restructuring Education: Corporate Action Package. Washington, DC: National Alliance of Business.Google Scholar
  16. Fitzgerald, J. (1997). Linking school-to-work programs to community economic development in urban schools. Urban Education 32 (November): 489–511.Google Scholar
  17. Fowler, F. C. (2000). Policy Studies for Education Leaders: An Introduction. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Gaston, A., Kelley, S., Knight Abowitz, K., Rousmaniere, K., and Solomon, W. (1999). Collaborations Within and Without: The Case Study of Taft High School. Columbus: Ohio Department of Education.Google Scholar
  19. Gelberg, D. (1997). The “Business” of Reforming American Schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gerstner, L. V., Semerad, R. D., Doyle, D. P., and Johnston, W. B. (1994). Reinventing Education. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  21. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Griggs, F. (1997, May 26). Taft boasts year of academic success. Cincinnati Post, pp. A1+.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, R. F., et al. (1993). Business-Education Partnerships: Developing a Collaborative Relationship with Business and Community. Macomb: Western Illinois University.Google Scholar
  24. Hill, P. T., Wise, A. E., and Shapiro, L. (1989). Educational Progress: Cities Mobilize to Improve Their Schools. Santa Monica: RAND.Google Scholar
  25. House, E. R. (1998). Schools for Sale: Why Free Market Policies Won't Improve America' Schools, and What Will. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kearns, D. T. (1988). An education recovery plan for America. Phi Delta Kappan 69 (April): 565–570.Google Scholar
  27. Kliebard, H. M. (1999). Schooled to Work: Vocationalism and the American Curriculum, 1876– 1946. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Knight Abowitz, K. (1999). Public heroes: Corporate leaders and American education. Unpublished paper presented at the Ohio Valley Philosophy of Education annual meeting, October 15.Google Scholar
  29. Kozol, J. (1992). Whittle and the Privateers. Nation, September 21, pp. 276–277.Google Scholar
  30. MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain't No Makin’ It. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mann, D. (1987). Business Involvement and Public School Improvement, Parts I and II. Phi Delta Kappan 69 (October, November): 123–128, 228– 232.Google Scholar
  32. Martin, S. R. (1994). The 1989 education summit as a defining moment in the politics of education. In K. M. Borman and N. P. Greenman (eds.), Changing American Education: Recapturing the Past or Inventing the Future? (pp. 133–159). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  33. Merenda, D. W. (1989). Partners in education: An old tradition renamed. Educational Leadership 47(October): 4–7.Google Scholar
  34. Mickelson, R. A. (1999). International business machinations: A case study of corporate involvement in local educational reform. Teachers College Record 100(3): 476–512.Google Scholar
  35. Molnar, A. (1996). Giving Kids the Business: The Commercialization of America' Schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  36. Orr, M. (1993). Urban regimes and school compacts: The development of the Detroit compact. The Urban Review 25(2): 105–122.Google Scholar
  37. Partnerships in Education: Education Trends of the Future (1984). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  38. Putnam, H. (1995). A reconsideration of Deweyan democracy. In R. B. Goodman (ed.), Pragmatism: A Contemporary Reader (pp. 183–204). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Rothenberg, J. (1997). Public-private partnerships and the “crisis” of local government. In Burton A. Weisbrod and James C. Worthy (eds.), The Urban Crisis: Linking Research to Action (pp. 177–204). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Senese, G. with Page, R. (1995). Simulation, Spectacle, and the Ironies of Education Reform. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  41. Shakeshaft, C., and Tractman, R. (1986). Corporate-school partnerships: The perspective of business. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  42. Shanker, A. (1984). Business is welcome in school. Across the Board ??(Conference Board magazine), 20(4): 59–61.Google Scholar
  43. Silver, M. B. (1990). The compact project: Bringing business and school together. Educational Horizons 68(Summer): 172–178.Google Scholar
  44. Simpson, D. J., and Jackson, M. J. B. (1997). Educational Reform: A Deweyan Perspective. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  45. Spring, J. (1998). Conflict of Interests: The Politics of American education (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  46. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Strike, K. A. (1993). Professionalism, democracy, and discursive communities: Normative reflections on restructuring. American Educational Research Journal 30(Summer): 255–275.Google Scholar
  48. Waddock, S. A. (1993). Lessons from the National Alliance of Business Compact Project: Business and public education reform. Human Relations 46(July): 849–879.Google Scholar
  49. Warner, C., with Curry, M. (1997). Everybody' House—The Schoolhouse: Best Techniques for Connecting Home, School, and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen Knight Abowitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational LeadershipMiami UniversityOxford

Personalised recommendations