Advertisement

Experimental Economics

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 115–131 | Cite as

On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System

  • Robin P. Cubitt
  • Chris Starmer
  • Robert Sugden
Article

Abstract

The random lottery incentive system is widely used in experimental economics to motivate subjects. This paper investigates its validity. It reports three experiments which compare responses given to decision tasks which are embedded in random lottery designs with responses in 'single choice' designs in which each subject faces just one task for real. The experiments were designed to detect cross-task contamination effects in the random lottery treatment. No significant differences between treatments, and no significant contamination effects, were found. Over the three experiments, observed differences between the treatments are adequately explained as sampling variation.

random lottery incentive system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allais, M. (1953). “Le Comportement de L'homme Rationnel Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de L'école Américaine.” Econometrica. 21, 503-546.Google Scholar
  2. Battalio, R.C., Kagel, J.H., and Jiranyakul, K. (1990). “Testing Between Alternative Models of Choice Under Uncertainty: Some Initial Results.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 3, 25-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beattie, J. and Loomes, G. (1997). “The Impact of Incentives Upon Risky Choice Experiments.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 14, 149-162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernasconi, M. (1994). “Nonlinear Preferences and Two-Stage Lotteries.” Economic Journal. 104, 54-70.Google Scholar
  5. Camerer, C. (1989). “An Experimental Test of Several Generalized Expected Utility Theories.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2, 61-104.Google Scholar
  6. Camerer, C. (1995). “Individual Decision Making.” In John Kagel and Alvin Roth (eds.). Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, chap. 8.Google Scholar
  7. Conlisk, J. (1989). “Three Variants on the Allais Example.” American Economic Review. 79, 392-407.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, D.D. and Holt, C.A. (1993). Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Harrison, G.W. (1994). “Expected Utility Theory and the Experimentalists.” Empirical Economics. 19, 223-253.Google Scholar
  10. Hirshleifer, J. and Riley, J.G. (1992). The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Holt, C.A. (1986). “Preference Reversals and the Independence Axiom.” American Economic Review. 76, 508-515.Google Scholar
  12. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica. 47, 263-291.Google Scholar
  13. Machina, M. (1982). “Expected Utility Analysis Without the Independence Axiom.” Econometrica. 50, 277-323.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, V.L. (1982). “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science.” American Economic Review. 72, 923-955.Google Scholar
  15. Starmer, C. (1992). “Testing New Theories of Choice Under Uncertainty Using the Common Consequence Effect.” Review of Economic Studies. 59, 813-830.Google Scholar
  16. Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1989). “Probability and Juxtaposition Effects: An Experimental Investigation of the Common Ratio Effect.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2, 159-178.Google Scholar
  17. Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1991). “Does the Random-Lottery Incentive System Elicit True Preferences? An Experimental Investigation.” American Economic Review. 81, 971-978.Google Scholar
  18. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science. 211, 453-458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilcox, N.T. (1993). “Lottery Choice: Incentives, Complexity and Decision Time.” Economic Journal. 103, 1397-1417.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin P. Cubitt
    • 1
  • Chris Starmer
    • 1
  • Robert Sugden
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economic and Social StudiesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichEngland

Personalised recommendations