Quality of Life Research

, Volume 8, Issue 1–2, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Use of the 12-item Short-Form (SF-12) Health Survey in an Australian heart and stroke population

  • L. L.-Y. Lim
  • J. D. Fisher
Article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to validate the SF-12 Health Survey in heart and stroke patients using a community-based study. Between November 1995 and August 1996, 3,362 patients were invited to join the Hunter Heart and Stroke Register in New South Wales, Australia and to complete the SF-12 Health Survey. Of the 3,362 patients, 2,341 (70%) returned the SF-12. Of those 2,341 patients, 78% completed all 12 items. Those who did not complete the questionnaire were significantly more likely to be females, older, less educated, have stayed longer in hospital and been admitted on emergency. The SF-12 demonstrated construct validity in an analysis restricted to the 1,831 patients who completed the questionnaire: scores measuring physical and mental health status were statistically significantly higher in men than women, in younger than older, in those who had shorter than longer lengths of stay in hospital, in patients whose hospital admissions were planned than emergencies and in heart than stroke patients. Construct validity of the SF-12 among patients able to complete the SF-12 suggests considerable potential for its use in assessing health status in large-scale surveys. However, caution should be taken with the heart and stroke population because of a relatively high incompletion rate.

SF-12 heart and stroke population Australia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB et al. Validating the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305: 160–164.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 1993; 306: 1437–1440.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCallum J. The SF-36 in an Asutralian sample: validating a new generic health status measure. Aust J Public Health 1995; 19: 160–166.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andresen EM, Bowley N, Rothenberg BM et al. Test–Retest performance of a mailed version of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey among older adults. Med Care 1996; 34: 1165–1170. Use of the SF-12 in a heart and stroke population Quality of Life Research.Vol 8.1999 7 L.L.-Y.Lim and J.D.Fisher 8 Quality of Life Research.Vol.1999 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weinberger M, Nagle B, Hanlon JT et al. Assessing health related quality of life in elderly outpatients: telephone versus face-to-face administration. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 1295–1299.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke 1996; 27: 1812–1816.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beattie DK, Golledge J, Greenhalgh RM, Davies AH. Quality of life assessment in vascular disease: towards a consensus. Eur J Vas Endovas Surg 1997; 13: 9–13.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson PA, Goldman L, Orav EJ et al. Comparison of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-item Health Survey in black patients and white patients with acute chest pain. Med Care 1995; 33: 145–160.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ware JE, Kosinki M, Keller SD. A 12-item Short Form Health Survey – construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220–233.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ware JE, Kosinki M, Keller SD. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. Boston, MA: T he Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lydick E, Epstein RS. Interpretation of quality of life changes. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 221–226.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu R et al. The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCallum J. The shorter Short Form: analysis of SF-12 items in Australian data. In Integrating Health Outcomes Measurement in Routine Health Care Conference 1996, Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (Received 10 January 1998; accepted 20 April 1998) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. L.-Y. Lim
    • 1
  • J. D. Fisher
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsThe University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.Hunter Area Health ServiceNew South WalesAustralia

Personalised recommendations