Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 669–681 | Cite as

On the inappropriate use of the naturalistic fallacy in evolutionary psychology

  • David Sloan Wilson
  • Eric Dietrich
  • Anne B. Clark
Article

Abstract

The naturalistic fallacy is mentionedfrequently by evolutionary psychologists as anerroneous way of thinking about the ethicalimplications of evolved behaviors. However,evolutionary psychologists are themselvesconfused about the naturalistic fallacy and useit inappropriately to forestall legitimateethical discussion. We briefly review what thenaturalistic fallacy is and why it is misusedby evolutionary psychologists. Then we attemptto show how the ethical implications of evolvedbehaviors can be discussed constructivelywithout impeding evolutionary psychologicalresearch. A key is to show how ethicalbehaviors, in addition to unethical behaviors,can evolve by natural selection.

Altruism Ethics Evolution Group selection Morality Multilevel selection Naturalistic fallacy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R.D.: 1987, The Biology of Moral Systems, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Arnhart, L.: 1998, Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  3. Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds): 1992, The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, J.: 1992, Familiar Quotations: a Collection of Passages, Phrases and Proverbs Traced to Their Sources in Ancient and Modern Literature, 16th edn., Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  5. Barrett, L., Dunbar, R. and Lycett, J.: 2002, Human Evolutionary Psychology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Boehm, C.: 1999, Hierarchy in the Forest: Egalitarianism and the Evolution of Human Altruism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.: 2002, ‘Homo Reciprocans’ Nature 415, 125–128.Google Scholar
  8. Buss, D.: 1990, ‘Evolutionary Social Psychology: Prospects and Pitfalls’ Motivation and Emotion 14, 265–286.Google Scholar
  9. Buss, D.M.: 1999, Evolutionary Psychology, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  10. Cartwright, J.: 2000. Evolution and Human Behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Daly, M. and Wilson, M.: 1988, Homicide, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Darwin, C.: 1871, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Appleton, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Fehr, E. and Gachter, S.: 2002, ‘Altruistic Punishment in Humans’ Nature 415, 137–140.Google Scholar
  14. Fukuyama, F.: 2002, Our Posthuman Future, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Gaulin, S.J.C. and McBurney, D.H.: 2001, Psychology: An Evolutionary Approach, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  16. Holmes, O.W.: 1897, ‘The Path of the Law’ Harvard Law Review 10, 457–478.Google Scholar
  17. Hume, D.: 1779, Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford University Press 1968, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Hrdy, S.: 1999, Mother Nature, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Moore, G.: 1903, Principia Ethica, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Richards, J.R.: 2000, Human Nature after Darwin, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  21. Richards, R.J.: 1986, ‘A Defence of Evolutionary Ethics’ Biology and Philosophy 1, 265–292.Google Scholar
  22. Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S.: 1998, Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Sober, E.: 1991, Core Questions in Philosophy, MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Sober, E.: 1994, From a Biological Point of View, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Thornhill, R. and Palmer, C.R.: 2000, A Natural History of Rape, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  26. Williams, B.: 1972, Morality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, D.S.: 1999, ‘A Critique of R.D. Alexander's Views on Group Selection’ Biology and Philosophy 14, 431–449.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, D.S.: 2002, Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion and the Nature of Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, M. and Daly, M.: 1992, ‘The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel’ in J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 289–326.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Sloan Wilson
    • 1
  • Eric Dietrich
    • 1
  • Anne B. Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Biological Sciences, Philosophy, and AnthropologyBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations