An Object-Based Contrast Source Inversion Method for Homogeneous Targets



An object-based inverse scattering algorithm is presented for electromagnetic imaging of homogeneous dielectric targets in a lossless, homogeneous background. The proposed approach embodies the use of a contrast source inversion method in conjunction with a curve-evolution-based reconstruction technique, thereby integrating the attractive computational features of the former with the robustness and edge-preserving capabilities of the latter. Numerical results involving single- and double-target configurations are presented to validate the approach and demonstrate its capabilities.

Inverse scattering contrast source inversion ground-penetrating radar subsurface imaging 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Tikhonov, A.N. and Arsenin, V.Y., 1977, Solution of Ill-Posed Problems: V.H. Winston, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertero, M. and Pike, E.R. (eds.) 1992, Inverse Problems in Scattering and Imaging: Adam Hilger, Bristol.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Isernia, T., Pascazio, V., and Pierri, R., 2001, On the local minima in a tomographic imaging technique: IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, v. 39, no. 7, p. 1596–1607.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colton, D. and Kress, R., 1992, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering: Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bucci, O.M., Crocco, L., Isernia, T., and Pascazio, V., 2001, Subsurface inverse scattering problems: quantifying, qualifying, and achieving the available information: IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, v. 39, no. 11, p. 2527–2538.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van den Berg, P.M. and Kleinman, R.E., 1997, A contrast source inversion method: Inverse Problems, v. 13, p. 1607–1620.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mumford, D. and Shah, J., 1989, Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems: Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, v. 42, no. 4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsai, A., Yezzi, T., and Willsky, A.S., 2001, Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford-Shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation and magnification: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, v. 10, p. 1169–1186.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vese, L. and Chan, T., 2002, A multiphase level set method for image segmentation using the Mumford and Shah Model: International Journal of Computer Vision, v. 50, p. 271–293.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yezzi, A., Kichenassamy, S., Kumar, K., Olver, P., and Tennenbaum, A., 1997, A geometric snake model for segmentation of medical imagery: IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, v. 16, no. 2, p. 199–209.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shah, J., 2000, Riemannian drums, anisotropic curve evolution, and segmentation: J. Visual Comm. Image Representation, v. 11, no. 2, p. 142–153.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chew, W.C., 1996, Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media: Oxford Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A., 1964, Handbook of Mathematical Functions: Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, Y. M. and Chew, W.C., 1989, An iterative solution of the two-dimensional inverse scattering problem: Int. J. Imaging System Technology, v. 1, p. 100–108.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chew, W.C. and Wang, Y.M., 1990, Reconstruction of two-dimensional permitivity distribution using the distorted Born iterative method: IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, v. 9, p. 218–225.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Habashy, T.M., Groom, R.W. and Spies, B., 1993, Beyond the Born and Rytov approximation: A nonlinear approach to electromagnetic scattering: J. Geophys. Res., v. 98, p. 1759–1775.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Devaney, A.J. and Sherman, G.C., 1982, Nonuniqueness in inverse source and scattering problems: IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., v. 30, p. 1034–1037.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bojarski, N.N., 1982, Comments on 'Nonuniqueness in inverse source and scattering problems': IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., v. 30, p. 1037–1038.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stone, W., 1982, Comments on 'Nonuniqueness in inverse source and scattering problems': IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., v. 30, p. 1037–1038.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chew, W.C., Wang, Y.M., Otto, G., Lesselier, D., and Bolomey, J.C., 1994, On the inverse source method of solving inverse scattering problems: Inverse Problems, v. 10, no. 3, p. 547–553.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    van den Berg, P.M. and Abubakar, A., 2001, Contrast source inversion method: State of art: J. Electromagnetic Waves Appls., v. 15, no. 11, p. 1503–1505.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Habashy, T.M., Oristaglio, M.L., and De Hoop, A.T., 1994, Simultaneous nonlinear reconstruction of two-dimensional permitivity and conductivity: Radio Science, v. 29, p. 1101–1108.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    van den Berg, P.M. and Haak, K.F.I., 1997, Profile inversion by error reduction in the source type integral equations, in van den Berg, P.M., Block, H., and Fokkema, J.T. (eds.), Wavefields and Reciprocity: Delft University Press, p. 87–98.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hansen, P.C., 1992, Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve: SIAM Review, v. 34, no. 4, p. 561–580.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van den Berg, P.M., van Broekhoven, A.L., and Abubakar, A., 1999, Extended contrast source inversion method: Inverse Problems, v. 15, p. 1325–1344.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abubakar, A. and van den Berg, P.M., 2001, Total variation as a multiplicative constraint for solving inverse problems: IEEE Trans. Image Processing, v. 10, no. 9, p. 1384–1392.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abubakar, A. and van den Berg, P.M., 2002, The contrast source inversion method for location and shape reconstructions: Inverse Problems, v. 18, no. 2, p. 495–510.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chiu, C.-C. and Kiang, Y.-W., 1991, Inverse scattering of a buried conducting cylinder: Inverse Problems, v. 7, p. 187–202.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Budko, N.V. and van den Berg, P.M., 1998, Two-dimensional object characterization with an effective model: J. Electromagnetic Waves Appls., v. 12, p. 177–190.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miller, E.L., Kilmer, M., and Rappaport, C., 2000, A new shape-based method for object localization and characterization from scattered field data: IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, v. 38, no. 4, p. 1682–1696.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Santosa, F., 1996, A level-set approach for inverse problems involving obstacles: SIAM: Control, Optimisation, and Calculus of Variations, v. 1, p. 17–33.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Litman, A., Lesselier, D., and Santosa, F., 1998, Reconstruction of a two-dimensional binary obstacle by controlled evolution of a level set: Inverse Problems, v. 14, p. 685–706.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dorn, O., Miller, E.L., and Rappaport, C.M., 2000, A shape reconstruction method for electromagnetic tomography using adjoint fields and level sets: Inverse Problems, v. 16, p. 1119–1156.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ramananjaona, C., Lambert, M., Lesselier, D., and Zolesio, J.-P., 2001, Shape reconstruction of buried obstacles by controlled evolution of a level set: From a min-max formulation to numerical experimentation: Inverse Problems, v. 17, p. 1087–1111.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Feng, H., 2002, Curve evolution object-based techniques for image reconstruction and segmentation, Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Feng, H., Karl, W.C., and Castanon, D.A., 2003, A curve evolution approach to objectbased tomographic reconstruction: IEEE Trans. Image Processing, v. 12, no. 1, p. 44–57.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Galdi, V., Feng, H., Castanon, D.A., Karl, W.C., and Felsen, L.B., 2003, Moderately rough surface underground imaging via short-pulse quasi-ray Gaussian beams, to appear in IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagat.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Galdi, V., Feng, H., Castanon, D.A., Karl, W.C., and Felsen, L.B., 2002, Multifrequency subsurface sensing in the presence of a moderately rough air-soil interface via quasi-ray Gaussian beams: Radio Science, Special Issue on 2001 URSI EMT Symposium.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bertsekas, D.P., 1999, Nonlinear Programming: 2nd ed., Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., and Flannery, B.P., 1992, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing: 2nd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Osher, S. and Sethian, J., 1988, Fronts propagation with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations: J. Comp. Physics, v. 56, p. 12–49.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vogel, C.R. and Oman, M.E., 1998, Fast, robust total variation-based reconstruction of noisy, blurred images: IEEE Trans. Image Processing, v. 7, no. 6, p. 813–824.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Leviatan, Y. and Boag, A., 1987, Analysis of electromagnetic scattering from dielectric cylinders using a multifilament current model: IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagat., v. 35, no. 10, p. 1119–1127.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bloemenkamp, R.F. and van den Berg, P.M., 2000, Time-domain profile inversion using contrast sources: Inverse Problems, v. 16, no. 5, p. 1173–1193.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haihua Feng
    • 1
  • Vincenzo Galdi
    • 1
    • 2
  • David A. Castañon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical & Computer EngineeringBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Waves Group, Department of EngineeringUniversity of Sannio Palazzo Dell'Aquila Bosco LucarelliBeneventoItaly

Personalised recommendations