Argumentation

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 481–512 | Cite as

Common Ground, Corrections, and Coordination

  • Nicholas Asher
  • Anthony Gillies

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Allen, James, L. K. Schubert, G. M. Ferguson, P. A. Heeman, C. H. Hwang, T. Kato, M. N. Light, N. G. Martin, B. W. Miller, M. Poesio and D. Traum: 1994, ‘The TRAINS Project: A Case Study in Building a Conversational Planning Agent’, Technical Report 532, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
  2. Asher, Nicholas: 1993, Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Asher, Nicholas: 1995, ‘From Discourse Macro-structure to Micro-structure and Back Again: Discourse Semantics and the Focus/Background Distinction’, in Hans Kamp and Barbara Partee (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Semantics in Context, Prague 1995, SFB340 Report, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  4. Asher, Nicholas: 1996, ‘The Mathematical Foundations of Discourse Structure’, Proceedings of the Tenth Amsterdam Conference on Formal Semantics Google Scholar
  5. Asher, Nicholas: 1998a, ‘Logical Foundations of Discourse Structure and Interpretation’, in J. M. Larrazabal, D. Lascar and G. Mints (eds.), Logic Colloquium 1996, Springer Verlag, 1–45.Google Scholar
  6. Asher, Nicholas: 1998b, ‘Varieties of Discourse Structure in Dialogue’, Twendial 98: Proceedings of the Twente Conference on Dialogue.Google Scholar
  7. Asher, Nicholas: 1999, ‘Discourse Structure and the Logic of Conversation’, First volume of Current Research in the Semantics Pragmatics Interface.Google Scholar
  8. Asher, Nicholas: and Tim Fernando: 1997, ‘Representations with Effective Labelling for Disambiguation’, The Second International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides: 1997, ‘Bridging’, Berlin Workshop on Underspecification, also in Journal of Semantics 15, 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides: 1998a, ‘Questions in Dialogue’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 237–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides: 1998b, ‘The Semantics and Pragmatics of Presupposition’, Journal of Semantics 15, 239–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides: in press, Logics of Conversation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Asher, Nicholas and Michael Morreau: 1991, ‘Commonsense Entailment: A Modal Theory of Nonmonotonic Reasoning’, in J. Mylopoulos and R. Reiter (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufman, Los Altos, California, 387–392.Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, Lauri: 1983, Dialogue Games. An Approach to Discourse Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, Herbert: 1996, Using Language, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, De Gruyter/Foris, Berlin/Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  18. van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 2003, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 2003, A Pragma-dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion, this volume.Google Scholar
  20. van Eemeren, Frans H. and Peter Houtlosser: 2002, ‘Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: A Delicate Balance’, in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 131–159.Google Scholar
  21. van Eemeren, Frans H. and Peter Houtlosser: 2003, Extending pragmadialectics, this volume.Google Scholar
  22. Garrod, Simon and Gwyneth Doherty: 1994, ‘Conversation, Co-ordination and Convention: An Empirical Investigation of How Groups Establish Linguistic Conventions’, Cognition 53.Google Scholar
  23. Ginzburg, Jonathan: 1994, ‘An Update Semantics for Dialogue’, in H. Bunt, R. Muskens and G. Rentier (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Institute for Language Technology and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  24. Ginzburg, Jonathan: 1997, ‘Resolving Questions Parts I and II’, Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  25. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1991, ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14.Google Scholar
  26. Henkemans, A. Francisca Snoeck: 2003, Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion, this volume.Google Scholar
  27. Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Lascarides, Alex and Nicholas Asher: 1993, ‘Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 437–493.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis, David: 1969, Convention, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. van Rees, M. Agnes: 2001, ‘The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussion’, Argumentation 15, 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roberts, Craige: 1996, Information Structure, Plans and Implicature, AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Implicature, Stanford CA.Google Scholar
  32. Roberts, Craige: 1997, Information Structure and Intonation, manuscript.Google Scholar
  33. Sacks, H.: 1992, Lectures on Conversation, vols. I and II, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Txurruka, I.: 1997, Particion Imformacional en el Discurso, Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastian, Spain.Google Scholar
  35. Vallduvi, E.: 1994, ‘The Dynamics of Information Packaging’, Dyana 2 Project Report, Centre for Cognitive Science and Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  36. van der Sandt, Rob: 1991, ‘Denial’, Chicago Linguistic Society 27 (2), 331–344.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Asher
    • 1
  • Anthony Gillies
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinU.S.A

Personalised recommendations