Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 325–339

Abusive Males and Abused Females in Adolescent Relationships: Risk Factor Similarity and Dissimilarity and the Role of Relationship Seriousness

  • H. Harrington Cleveland
  • Veronica M. Herrera
  • Jeffrey Stuewig
Article

Abstract

This study examines male-to-female physical abuse within adolescent relationships. Analyses use data describing 603 opposite sex relationships reported during Wave II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) matched with data on the individual characteristics of both the reporting females and their male partners from Wave I. In addition to the occurrence of physical abuse, relationship data included information on the seriousness of the relationships. Female and male participants' scores on 14 individual-level variables were used to predict abuse. The first set of analysis found that male-to-female abuse was predicted by 6 individual characteristics of males and 6 individual characteristics of females. Only one of these characteristics, grade point average (GPA), was a significant predictor of the occurrence of male-to-female abuse for both male and female relationship participants. The other characteristics were each only predictive for either males—Verbal IQ, Fighting, Attitudes About Sex and Relationships, and Past Sexual Behavior, or females—Mother Relationship, School Attachment, Drinking Behaviors, and Depression. Analyses also revealed that associations between different individual-level characteristics and relationship abuse were dependant on relationship seriousness. These findings suggest that relationship seriousness, which did not itself predict abuse, may act as a catalyst for the influence of some individual-level characteristics on the occurrence of abuse in relationships.

dating violence high school adolescents gender 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apt, C., and Hurlbert, D. F. (1993). The sexuality of women in physically abusive marriages: A comprehensive study. J. Fam. Violence 8: 57–69.Google Scholar
  2. Bearman, P. S., Jones, J., and Udry, J. R. (1998). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research Design. Retrieved January 15, 1999 from WWW.http:/www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.htmlGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman, L. (1992). Dating violence among high school students. Soc. Work 37: 22–27.Google Scholar
  4. Bookwala, J., Frieze, I. H., Smith, C., and Ryan, K. (1992). Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis. Violence Vict. 7: 297–311.Google Scholar
  5. Cano, A., Avery-Leaf, S., Cascardi, M., and O'Leary, K. D. (1998). Dating violence in two high school samples: Discriminating variables. J. Prim. Prev. 18: 431–446.Google Scholar
  6. Cate, R. M., Henton, J. M., Koval, J., Christopher, F. S., and Lloyd, S. (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective. J. Fam. Issues 3: 79–90.Google Scholar
  7. Deal, J., and Wampler, K. (1986). Dating violence: The primacy of previous experience. J. Soc. Pers. Relationships 3: 457–471.Google Scholar
  8. DeMaris, A. (1997). Elevated sexual activity in violent marriages: Hypersexuality or sexual extortion? J. Sex Res. 34: 361–373.Google Scholar
  9. Farrington, D. (1991). Childhood aggression and adult violence: Early precursors and later life outcomes. In Pepler, D. J., and Rubin, K. H. (Eds.), The Development and Treatment of Childhood Aggression, Earlbaum, New Jersey, pp. 5–29.Google Scholar
  10. Follingstad, D. R., Rutlegde, L. L., Polek, D. S., and McNeill-Hawkins, K. (1988). Factors associated with patterns of dating violence toward college women. J. Fami. Violence 3: 169–182.Google Scholar
  11. Foo, L., and Margolin, G. (1995). A multivariate investigation of dating aggression. J. Fam. Viol. 10: 351–377.Google Scholar
  12. Garmezy, N. (1987). Stress, competence, and development: Continuities in the study of schizophrenic adults, children vulnerable to psychopathy and the search for resistant children. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 57: 159–174.Google Scholar
  13. Halpern, C. T., Joyner, K. Udry, J. R., and Suchindran, C. (1999). Smart teens don't have sex (or kiss much either). J. Adolesc. Health 26: 213–225.Google Scholar
  14. Henton, J. M., Cate, R. M., Koval, J., Lloyd, S., and Christopher, F. S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. J. Fam. Issues 4: 467–482.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, S. M. (1999). Issues in the dating violence research: A review of the literature. Aggression Violent Behav. 4: 233–247.Google Scholar
  16. Jaffe, P. G., Wolfe, D. A., and Wilson, S. K. (1990). Children of Battered Women, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Jessor, R., and Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem Behavior and Psychosocial Development: A Longitudinal Study of Youth, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. King, C. E., and Christensen, A. (1983). The Relationship Events Scale: A Guttman scaling of progress in courtship. J. Marriage Fam. 45: 671–678.Google Scholar
  19. Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Fam. Relat. 30: 97–102.Google Scholar
  20. Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization. Fam. Relat. 35: 383–388.Google Scholar
  21. Migeot, M., and Lester, D. (1996). Psychological abuse in dating, locus of control, depression, and suicidal preoccupation. Psychol. Rep. 79: 682.Google Scholar
  22. O'Keefe, M. (1997). Predictors of dating violence among high school students. J. Interpers. Violence 12: 546–568.Google Scholar
  23. O'Keefe, M. (1998). Factors mediating the link between witnessing interparental violence and dating violence. J. Fam. Violence 13: 39–57.Google Scholar
  24. O'Keefe, M. and Treister, L. (1998). Victims of dating violence among high school students: Are the predictors different for males and females? Violence Against Women 4: 195–223.Google Scholar
  25. O'Leary, D. A., Barling, J., Arias, I., Rosenbaum, A., Malone, J., and Tyree, A. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: A longitudinal analysis. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 57: 263–268.Google Scholar
  26. Reuterman, N. A., and Burcky, W. D. (1989). Dating violence in high school: A profile of the victims. Psychol. J. Hum. Behav. 26: 1–9.Google Scholar
  27. Riggs, D. S., and O'Leary, K. D. (1989). A theoretical model of courtship aggression. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (Eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
  28. Riggs, D. S., and O'Leary, K. D. (1996). Aggression between heterosexual dating partners: An examination of a causal model of courtship aggression. J. Interpers. Violence 11: 519–540.Google Scholar
  29. Riggs, D. S., O'Leary, K. D., and Breslin, F. C. (1990). Multiple correlates of physical aggression in dating couples. J. Interpers. Violence 5: 61–73.Google Scholar
  30. Roscoe, B., and Callahan, J. E. (1985). Adolescents' self-report of violence in families and dating relations. Adolescence 20: 546–551.Google Scholar
  31. Rowe, D. C., Vazsonyi, A. T., and Figueredo, A. J. (1997). Mating-effort in adolescence: A conditional or alternative strategy. Personal. Individ. Differences 23: 105–115.Google Scholar
  32. Seligman, C. K., Berry, C. J., and Wiles, K. A. (1984). Violence in college students dating relationships. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 5: 530–548.Google Scholar
  33. Simons, R. L., Lin, K. H., and Gordon, L. C. (1998). Socialization in the family of origin and male dating violence: A prospective study. J. Marriage Fam. 60: 467–478.Google Scholar
  34. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1988). Violence in American families: How much is there and why does it occur? In Nunnally, E. W., Chilman, C. S., and Cox, F. (Eds.), Families in Trouble Series, Vol. 3. Troubled Relationships, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 141–162.Google Scholar
  35. Sugarman, D. A., and Hoteling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (Eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
  36. Wyman, P. A., Cowen, E. L., Work, W. C., and Parker, G. R. (1991). Developmental and family milieu correlates of resilience in urban children who have experienced major life-stress. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 19: 405-426.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Harrington Cleveland
    • 1
  • Veronica M. Herrera
    • 2
  • Jeffrey Stuewig
    • 3
  1. 1.Texas Tech UniversityLubbock
  2. 2.Indiana University BloomingtonIndiana
  3. 3.George Mason UniversityFairfax

Personalised recommendations