International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 1113–1120 | Cite as

Field Methods for Capturing and Marking Azarai Night Monkeys

  • Eduardo Fernandez-Duque
  • Marcelo Rotundo

Abstract

Long-term behavioral studies require the permanent identification of individuals. The need for individual identification is even more crucial for sexually monomorphic species since not even the sexes can be differentiated by the field observer. Owl monkeys (Aotus spp.) are sexually monomorphic primates inhabiting the forests of Central and South America. We report here on the methods and drug dosages used to capture, mark, and identify individual owl monkeys (Aotus azarai azarai) in Eastern Formosa, Argentina. We successfully captured 70 owl monkeys using blowpipes or a CO2 rifle, but attempts to capture them with baited traps proved unsuccessful. During the marking and collaring procedures, we gave individuals on average a total of 50 mg of ketamine hydrochloride, including the dose in the dart. To mark them, we freeze-branded portions of their tails and fitted them with radio or bead collars. There was no death or physical life-threatening injury while capturing or marking individuals. The procedures we describe should allow one to safely capture and to mark small arboreal primates when trapping is not possible.

owl monkey ketamine marking capturing Aotus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aquino, R., and Encarnacion, F. (1986). Population structure of Aotus nancymai (Cebidae: Primates) in Peruvian Amazon Lowland Forest. Am. J. Primatol. 11: 1-7.Google Scholar
  2. Aquino, R., and Encarnacion, F. (1994). Owl monkey populations in Latin America: Field work and conservation. In Baer, J. F., Weller, R. E., and Kakoma, I. (Eds.), Aotus: The Owl Monkey, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 59-95.Google Scholar
  3. Bossuyt, F. (2002). Natal dispersal of titi monkeys (Callicebus moloch) at Cocha Cashu, Manú National Park, Perú. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 34 (Suppl.): 47.Google Scholar
  4. Fernandez-Duque, E., and Huntington, C. (2002). Disappearances of individuals from social groups have implications for understanding natal dispersal in monogamous owl monkeys (Aotus azarai). Am. J. Primatol. 57: 219-225.Google Scholar
  5. Fernandez-Duque, E., Rotundo, M., and Sloan, C. (2001). Density and population structure of owl monkeys (Aotus azarai) in the Argentinean Chaco. Am. J. Primatol. 53: 99-108.Google Scholar
  6. Glander, K. E., Fedigan, L. M., Fedigan, L., and Chapman, C. (1991). Field methods for capture and measurement of three monkey species in Costa Rica. Folia Primatol. 57: 70-82.Google Scholar
  7. Gozalo, A. (1985). Aspectos clinicos de la asociacion de los clorhidratos de ketamina y xilacina en el Aotus sp. (“musmuqui” o “mono nocturno”), DMV Thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.Google Scholar
  8. Gursky, S. L. (1998). Effects of radio transmitter weight on a small nocturnal primate. Am. J. Primatol. 46: 145-155.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, T. W., and Bush, B. B. (1987). Darting and marking techniques for an arboreal forest monkey, Cercopithecus ascanius. Am. J. Primatol. 12: 81-89.Google Scholar
  10. Müller, K.-H., and Schildger, J. (1994). Capture and radio-telemetry of masked titi monkeys, Callicebus personatus melanochir. Neotrop. Primatol. 2: 7-8.Google Scholar
  11. Savage, A., Giraldo, H. L., Blumer, E. S., Soto, L. H., Burger, W., and Snowdon, C. T. (1993). Field techniques for monitoring cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus oedipus). Am. J. Primatol. 31: 189-196.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, R. J., and Jungers, W. L. (1997). Body mass in comparative primatology. J. Hum. Evol. 32: 523-559.Google Scholar
  13. Terborgh, J., and Goldizen, A. W. (1985). On the mating system of the cooperatively breeding saddle-backed tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 293-299.Google Scholar
  14. Wilson, D. E., Cole, R. F., Nichols, J. D., Rudran, R., and Foster, M. S. (1996). Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Mammals, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Wright, P. C. (1985). The Costs and Benefits of Nocturnality for Aotus trivirgatus (The Night Monkey), City University of New York, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Wright, P. C. (1994). The behavior and ecology of the owl monkey. In Baer, J. F., Weller, R. E., and Kakoma, I. (Eds.), Aotus: The Owl Monkey, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 97-112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Fernandez-Duque
    • 1
  • Marcelo Rotundo
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego and Centro de Ecología Aplicada del LitoralConicetArgentina
  2. 2.Fundación E.C.O.FormosaArgentina

Personalised recommendations