, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 219–239

The Triple Helix as a model to analyze Israeli Magnet Program and lessons for late-developing countries like Turkey



Although the systemic changes towards innovation networking between university-industry and governmental actors have recently found a place on the international policy and literature agenda, networking between the organizations and people - for the national survival, production and growth - has been deeply rooted in the Israeli system even before the establishment of the Israeli State in 1948. Internal and international constraints fostered the formation of personal links, as did institutional settings that promoted networking. This paper reviews the interaction of societal, organizational and cultural features that render innovation networks in Israel successful. The research focuses on the impacts of the Israeli Magnet Program on the Israeli R&D growth and performance. The implications of innovation networks for a late-developing country like Turkey are reviewed in the contexts of catching-up and cross-regional collaboration between the Israeli and Turkish industries and academies.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AMIDON, M. D. (1996), Decade of perspective: A vision for the technology transfer profession, Technology Transfer Journal of the Technology Transfer Society, 21 (1/2): 5-8.Google Scholar
  2. BERRY, O. (1998), available at Scholar
  3. BOZKURT, V., S. AYTAC (1998), University industry partnership in Turkey (1998), Iktisat Dergisi Uludag University, 16 (4): 25-32.Google Scholar
  4. DAVID, P. A., D. FORAY, W. E. STEINMUELLeR (1999), The research network and the new economics of science: From metaphors to organizational behavior, 1997. In: A. GAMBARDeLLA, F. MALeRBA (Eds) The Organization of Innovative Activities in Europe, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. DAVIS, C. H., F. CARDeN (1999), Research Effectiveness and R&D Evaluation in Developing Countries, available at Scholar
  6. De CASTRO, E. A., C. RODRIGUES, C. ESTEVES, A. DA ROSA PIRES (2000), The Triple Helix Model a motor for the creative use of telematics. Research Policy, 29 (2): 193-203.Google Scholar
  7. DeBRESSON, C., F. AMESSE (1991), Networks of innovators: A review and introduction to the issue, Research Policy, Special Edition, pp. 363.379.Google Scholar
  8. DODGSON, M., R. ROTWELL (1994), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
  9. DODGSON, M. (2001), Strategic research partnerships: Their role and some issues in measuring their extent and outcomes, Proceedings from NSF Workshop, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  10. ENOSH (2001), Private Consulting Firm Report on the Magnet Program, (originally, in Hebrew some parts are translated to English by the author)Google Scholar
  11. ETZKOWITZ, H., A. WEBSTER, C. GEBHARDT, B. R. C. TERRA, (2000), The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, 29: 313-330.Google Scholar
  12. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LeYDeSDORFF (1997), Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Science and Public Policy, 24 (1): 2-5.Google Scholar
  13. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LeYDeSDORFF (1997), Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy: The Triple Helix of University Industry Government Relations, Cassell Academic, London.Google Scholar
  14. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LeYDeSDORFF (1998), The endless transition: A 'Triple Helix' of university-industry-government relations, Minerva, 36: 203-208.Google Scholar
  15. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LeYDeSDORFF (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and Mode 2 to Triple Helix of university industry government relations, Research Policy, 29: 109-123.Google Scholar
  16. EU MNC Report (1997), available at Scholar
  17. EU Trend Chart on Innovation, Country Reports on Israel, July 2000-December 2000Google Scholar
  18. FRENKEL, A., S. ROPER (2000), Different Paths to Success: The Growth of Electronics Sector in Ireland & Israel, SNI Publications.Google Scholar
  19. FUJIGAKI, Y., L. LeYDeSDORFF (2000), Quality control and validation boundaries in a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations: 'Mode 2' and the future of university research, Social Science Information, 39 (4): 635-655.Google Scholar
  20. GIBSON, D. V., E. M. ROGERS (1994), R&D Collaboration on Trial, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass. pp. 21-22.Google Scholar
  21. GILBERT, N., P. AHRWEILeR, A. PYKA, R. E. I. GLeN (1999), Innovation Networks: A Policy Model, SEIN Project paper #8.Google Scholar
  22. GUSTON, D. H., K. KENISTON (1994), Introduction: The social contract for science. In: GUSTON, D. H., KENISTON, K. (Eds), The Fragile Contract, MIT Press, Cambridge and London, pp. 1-41.Google Scholar
  23. HAMEL, G., Y. DOZ, C. K. PRAHALAD (1989), Collaborate with your competitors and win, Harvard Business Review, 1: 133-139.Google Scholar
  24. Harvard University Gazette (1998), available at Scholar
  25. iis.dll/Serve/item/English/ No. 4.Google Scholar
  26. ISTE TURKIYE (2000), available at Scholar
  27. JACOB, M., T. HELLSTROM, N. ADLeR, F. NORRGREN (2000), From sponsorship to partnership in academy-industry relations, R&D Management, 30 (3): 255-262.Google Scholar
  28. KAUKONEN, E., M. NIEMINEN (1998), The future of Triple Helices: Mobile or vanishing boundaries, Triple Helix Conference II, New York.Google Scholar
  29. KIM, J. (1999), Network building between Research Institutions and Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Dynamics of Innovation Network Building and Implications for a Policy Option, Korea Institute of Public Administration Publications.Google Scholar
  30. KLINE, L., N. ROSENBERG, N. (2000), An overview of innovation, In: R. LAUDAU, N. Rosenberg (Eds), The Positive Sum Strategy. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  31. KOSCHATZKY, K., M. KULICKE (1994), Policies towards technology-based companies in a regional context, In: K. GONDA, F. SAKAUCHI, T. HIGGINS (Eds), Regionalization of Science and Technology Resources in the context of Globalization.Google Scholar
  32. LeVY, J. D., R. J. SAMUELS (1991), Research collaboration as technology strategy, In: Mytelka, L. K. (Ed.), Strategic Partnerships, Pinter Publishers, London, pp.120-148.Google Scholar
  33. LeYDeSDORFF, L., H. ETZKOWITZ (1996), Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Science and Public Policy, 23 (5): 279-286.Google Scholar
  34. LUNDVALL, B. A. (1992), National Systems of Innovation, Pinter Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  35. MAGNET PROGRAM EVALUATION REPORT (1998), MOIT Publications Israel.Google Scholar
  36. MANI, S. (2002), Government, Innovation and Technology Policy (2000) in International Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  37. METCALFE, S. (1990), On diffusion, investment, and the process of technological change, In: E. DeIACO, E. HORNELL, G. VICKERY (Eds), Technology and Investment: Critical Issues for the 1990s. Pinter Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  38. METCALFE, S. (1995), The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives, In: Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, P. STONEMAN (Ed.), Basil Blackwell, USA, pp. 409-512.Google Scholar
  39. National Expenditure on Civilian R&D 1989-2000, Central Bureau of Statistics Publication No: 1167, Israel.Google Scholar
  40. NELSON, R. R. (1996), Sources of Economic Growth, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  41. NORDFORS, D., B. BERGER (2000), Technology Transfer Between Industry, Academia and Defense in Israel, Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences.Google Scholar
  42. OECD (1999), Managing National Innovation Systems, Paris.Google Scholar
  43. PAVITT, K. (1997), Academic research, technical change and government policy, In: J. KRIGE, D. PESTRE (Eds), Science in the Twentieth Century, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 143-158.Google Scholar
  44. PORTER, E. M. (1998), Clusters and the New Economics of Competition, Harvard Business Review, Article.Google Scholar
  45. Report on Pre-Competitive Research, (1994), TUBITAK Publications, available at Scholar
  46. RULLANI, E., A. ZANFEI (1988), Networks between manufacturing and demand: Cases from textile and clothing industries, In: C. ANTONELLI (Ed.), New Information Technology and Industrial Change, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  47. SINHA, D. K., M. CUSUMANO (1991), Complementary resources and cooperative research: A model of research joint ventures among competitors, Management Science, 37: 1091-1106.Google Scholar
  48. SKYRME, D. (1994), Innovation Through Knowledge Networks, Management Insight, No. 12.Google Scholar
  49. STEINMUELLeR, W. E. (1994), Basic research and industrial innovation, 1994, In: M. DODGSON, R. ROTHWELL (Eds), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Chapter 5, pp. 54-66.Google Scholar
  50. TEUBAL, M. (1993), The national innovation system of Israel: Issues, problems and challenges, In: R. NELSON (Ed.), National Systems of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. TILLeS, J. (1987), Israeli Economic Performance, Jerusalem Institute of Management, Telesis, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  52. TRAJTENBERG, M. (1999), Innovation in Israel: A Comparative Study Using Patent Data, NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  53. TRAJTENBERG, M. (2000), R&D Policy in Israel: An Overview and Reassessment, SNI Working Papers Series.Google Scholar
  54. TUGCU, K. (2000), available at Scholar
  55. UZUMCU, A. (2000), available at Current Issues/turkish-israeli relations.Google Scholar
  56. Von HIPPLe, E. (1987), Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading, Research Policy, 16 (6): 291-302.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publisher/Akadémiai Kiadó 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of InnovationLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations