Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 445–467 | Cite as

The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics

  • Loet LeydesdorffEmail author
Article

Abstract

University-industry-government relations provide a networked infrastructure for knowledge-based innovation systems. This infrastructure organizes the dynamic fluxes locally and the knowledge base remains emergent given these conditions. Whereas the relations between the institutions can be measured as variables, the interacting fluxes generate a probabilistic entropy. The mutual information among the three institutional dimensions provides us with an indicator of this entropy. When this indicator is negative, self-organization can be expected. The self-organizing dynamic may temporarily be stabilized in the overlay of communications among the carrying agencies. The various dynamics of Triple Helix relations at the global and national levels, in different databases, and in different regions of the world, are distinguished by applying this indicator to scientometric and webometric data.

Keywords

Entropy Knowledge Base National Level Mutual Information Innovation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ABRAMSON, N. (1963), Information Theory and Coding. New York, etc.: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. ARTHUR, W. B. (1988), Competing technologies. In: G. DOSI, C. FREEMAN, R. NELSON, G. SILVERBERG, L. SOETE (Eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory (pp. 590-607.). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  3. BAR-HILLeL, Y. (1955), An examination of information theory. Phil. Sci., 22, 86-105.Google Scholar
  4. BAR-ILAN, J. (2001), Data collection methods on the Web for informetric purposes-A review and analysis. Scientometrics, 50 (1): 7-32.Google Scholar
  5. BLACK, G. R. (2003), Keyword Patent Searching Online, at http://www.keypatent.net/Google Scholar
  6. BUTLeR, D. (2000), Souped-up search engines,. Nature, 405 (11 May): 2112-2115.Google Scholar
  7. DAVID, P. A. (1985), Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75: 332-337.Google Scholar
  8. DeBACKERE, K., A. VERBEEK, M. LUWEL, E. ZIMMERMANN (2002), Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology: Part II: The multiple uses of technometric indicators, International Journal of Management Reviews, 4 (3): 213-231.Google Scholar
  9. EBELING, W., T. POESCHEL, K.-F. ALBRECHT (1995), Entropy, transinformation and word distribution of information-carrying sequences. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 5: 51; at http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/?0204045Google Scholar
  10. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LeYDeSDORFF (1995), The Triple Helix. University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14: 14-19.Google Scholar
  11. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LeYDeSDORFF (Eds). (1997), Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  12. GIDDeNS, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. GOGUEN, J. A., F. J. VARELA (1979), Systems and distinctions: duality and complementarity, International Journal of General Systems, 5: 31-43.Google Scholar
  14. L. LeYDeSDORFF: Triple Helix dynamics Scientometrics 58 (2003) 467Google Scholar
  15. GRANSTRAND, O. (1999), The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  16. LeWONTIN, R. (2000), The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. LeYDeSDORFF, L. (1995), The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications. Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University; at http://www.upublish.com/books/leydesdorff-sci.htmGoogle Scholar
  18. LeYDeSDORFF, L. (2001a), Indicators of innovation in a knowledge-based economy. Cybermetrics, 5 (Issue 1), Paper 2, at http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v5i1p2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  19. LeYDeSDORFF, L. (2001b), A Sociological Theory of Communication: The Self-Organization of the Knowledge-Based Society. Parkland, FL: Universal Publishers; at http://www.upublish.com/books/leydesdorff.htmGoogle Scholar
  20. LeYDeSDORFF, L. (2003), Translations at interfaces in Triple Helix configurations: Mapping the case off stem cell. research. Paper to be presented at the 9th International Conference of the International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics, Beijing, August 25-29.Google Scholar
  21. LeYDeSDORFF, L., M. CURRAN (2000), Mapping university-industry-government relations on the Internet: An exploration of indicators for a knowledge-based economy. Cybermetrics, 4 (Issue 1) Paper 2 at http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v4i1p2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  22. LeYDeSDORFF, L., H. ETZKOWITZ (1998), The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25 (3):195-203.Google Scholar
  23. LeYDeSDORFF, L., N. OOMES (1999), Is the European monetary system converging to integration? Social Science Information, 38 (1): 57-86.Google Scholar
  24. NARIN, F., D. OLIVASTRO (1988), Technology indicators based on patents and patent citations. In: A. F. J. Van RAAN (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 465-507.Google Scholar
  25. PAULING, L., R. B. COREY (1953), A proposed structure for the nucleic acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 84-97.Google Scholar
  26. POINCARé, H. (1905), Leçons de mécanique céleste (1905 vol. I, 1907 vol. II part I, 1909 vol. II part II, 1911 vol. III). Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
  27. RIBA-VILANOVA, M., L. LeYDeSDORFF (2001). Why Catalonia cannot be considered as a regional innovation system. Scientometrics, 50 (2): 215-240.Google Scholar
  28. ROUSSEAU, R. (1999), Daily time series of common single word searches in AltaVista and NorthernLight,. Cybermetrics, 2/3, Paper 2 at http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v2i1p2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  29. SHANNON, C. E. (1948), A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379-423 and 623-656.Google Scholar
  30. THEIL, H. (1972), Statistical Decomposition Analysis. Amsterdam/London: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  31. WAGNER, C. S., L. LeYDeSDORFF (2003), Mapping global science using international co-authorships: A comparison of 1990 and 2000. In: J. GUOHUA, R. ROUSSEAU, W. YISHAN (Eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Dalian: Dalian University of Technology Press, pp. 330-340.Google Scholar
  32. WATSON, J. (1970), The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  33. WATSON, J., F. CRICK (1953), A structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid. Nature, 171 (25 April): 737-738.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publisher/Akadémiai Kiadó 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations