Minds and Machines

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 521–536 | Cite as

Shifting the Paradigm of Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Information and a New Renaissance

  • Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic

Abstract

Computing is changing the traditional field of Philosophy of Science in a very profound way. First as a methodological tool, computing makes possible ``experimental Philosophy'' which is able to provide practical tests for different philosophical ideas. At the same time the ideal object of investigation of the Philosophy of Science is changing. For a long period of time the ideal science was Physics (e.g., Popper, Carnap, Kuhn, and Chalmers). Now the focus is shifting to the field of Computing/Informatics. There are many good reasons for this paradigm shift, one of those being a long standing need of a new meeting between the sciences and humanities, for which the new discipline of Computing/Informatics gives innumerable possibilities. Contrary to Physics, Computing/Informatics is very much human-centered. It brings a potential for a new Renaissance, where Science and Humanities, Arts and Engineering can reach a new synthesis, so very much needed in our intellectually split culture. This paper investigates contemporary trends and the relation between the Philosophy of Science and the Philosophy of Computing and Information, which is equivalent to the present relation between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Physics.

computation digital philosophy information information society information technology information-theoretic methodology philosophy of AI philosophy of computer science philosophy of computing philosophy of information philosophy of science 

References

  1. ACM/IEEE (2001), Computing Curricula 2001, http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/index.htmGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowyer, K.W. (ed.) (2000), Ethics and Computing, Wiley-IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bynum, T.W. and Moor, J.H. (1998), The Digital Phoenix, How Computers are Changing Philosophy.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, R. (1994), An Introduction to The Philosophy of Science, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Chaitin, G.J. (1987), Algorithmic Information Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chalmers, A. (1990), What Is This Thing Called Science?, Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  7. Dodig-Crnkovic, G. (2003a), Computing Curricula: Social, Ethical, and Professional Issues, Proceedings Conference for the Promotion of Research in IT at New Universities and at University Colleges in Sweden.Google Scholar
  8. Dodig-Crnkovic, G. and Crnkovic, I. (2003b), Computing Curricula: Teaching Theory of Science to Computer Science Students, Proceedings Hawaii International Conference on Education.Google Scholar
  9. Dodig-Crnkovic, G. (2002), Scientific Methods in Computer Science, Proceedings Conference for the Promotion of Research in IT at New Universities and at University Colleges in Sweden.Google Scholar
  10. Dodig-Crnkovic G. (2001), What Ultimately Matters, Indeed?, Proceedings Conference for the Promotion of Research in IT at New Universities and at University Colleges in Sweden.Google Scholar
  11. Feyerabend, P. (2000), Against Method, Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Floridi, L. (2003), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information.Google Scholar
  13. Floridi, L. (2002), What is the Philosophy of Information? Metaphilosophy 33(1/2), pp. 123–145.Google Scholar
  14. Floridi, L. (1999), Philosophy and Computing: An introduction, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lelas, S. (2000), Science and Modernity, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Martin, M. and Schinzinger, R., (1989), Ethics In Engineering, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Mitcham, C. (1994), Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Newell, A. (1985), in D.G. Bobrow and P.J. Hayes, ‘Artificial Intelligence – Where Are We?’ Artificial Intelligence 25, p. 3.Google Scholar
  20. Popper, K.R. (1999), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Rheingold, H. (1985), Tools For Thought: The History and Future of Mind-Expanding Technology, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, B.C. (1995), On the Origin of Objects, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  23. Sokal A.D. (1996), Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity, Social Text 46/47, pp. 217–252.Google Scholar
  24. Thagard, P.R. (1993), Computational Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Weinberg, S. (2001), Can Science Explain Everything? Anything? The New York Review of Books, May 31, 2001.Google Scholar
  26. Weinberg, S. (1996), Sokal's Hoax, The New York Review of Books LIII(13), pp. 11–15.Google Scholar
  27. Whitehead, A.N. (1997), Science and the Modern World, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic
    • 1
  1. 1.Computing Laboratory IDtMälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden

Personalised recommendations