Journal of Economic Growth

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 267–299 | Cite as

Inequality and Growth: What Can the Data Say?

  • Abhijit V. Banerjee
  • Esther Duflo


This paper describes the correlations between inequality and the growth rates in cross-country data. Using non-parametric methods, we show that the growth rate is an inverted U-shaped function of net changes in inequality: changes in inequality (in any direction) are associated with reduced growth in the next period. The estimated relationship is robust to variations in control variables and estimation methods. This inverted U-curve is consistent with a simple political economy model but it could also reflect the nature of measurement errors, and, in general, efforts to interpret this evidence causally run into difficult identification problems. We show that this non-linearity is sufficient to explain why previous estimates of the relationship between the level of inequality and growth are so different from one another.

inequality growth cross-country regressions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acemoglu, D., and F. Zilibotti. (1997) “Was Prometheus Unbound by Chance? Risk, Diversification, and Growth,” Journal of Political Economy 105(4), 709-751.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., and J. Robinson. (2000). “Why did the West Extend the Franchise? Democracy, Inequality and Growth in Historical Perspective,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(4), 1167-1199.Google Scholar
  3. Aghion, et al. (1999). “Dualism and Macro-Economic Stability,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(4), 1359-1397.Google Scholar
  4. Aghion, P., and P. Bolton. (1997). “A Trickle-Down Theory of Growth and Development with Debt Overhang,” Review of Economic Studies 64(2), 151-172.Google Scholar
  5. Alesina, A., and D. Rodrik. (1994). “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(2), 465-490.Google Scholar
  6. Alesina, A., and R. Perotti. (1996). “Income Distribution, Political Instability and Investment,” European Economic Review 81(5), 1170-1189.Google Scholar
  7. Angrist, J. D., and A. B. Krueger. (1999). “Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics,” In Orley Ashenfelter and David Cards, eds., Handbook of Labour Economics, Vol. 3A. Amsterdam: North Holland: 1277-1366.Google Scholar
  8. Arellano, M., and S. Bond. (1991). “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,” Review of Economic Studies 58, 277-297.Google Scholar
  9. Atkinson, A. B., and A. Brandolini. (2001). “Promise and Pitfalls in the use of ‘secondary’ Data-Sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study,” Journal of Economic Literature 39(3), 771-799.Google Scholar
  10. Banerjee, A., and A. Newman. (1993). “Occupational Choice and the Process of Development,” Journal of Political Economy 101(2), 274-298.Google Scholar
  11. Banerjee, A., and A. Newman. (1994). “Poverty, Incentives, and Development,” American Economic Review 84(2), 211-215.Google Scholar
  12. Banerjee, et al. (2001). “Inequality, Control Rights and Rent Seeking: Sugar Cooperatives in Maharashtra,” Journal of Political Economy 109(1), 138-190.Google Scholar
  13. Barro, R. J. (2000). “Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries,” Journal of Economic Growth 5(1), 5-32.Google Scholar
  14. Benabou, R. (2000). “Unequal Socities: Income Distribution and the Social Contract,” American Economic Review 90(1), 96-129.Google Scholar
  15. Benhabib, J., and A. Rustichini. (1998). “Social Conflict and Growth,” Journal of Economic Growth 1(1), 143-158.Google Scholar
  16. Benhabib, J., and M. M. Spiegel. (1998). “Cross-Country Growth Regressions,” Mimeo.Google Scholar
  17. Caselli, et al. (1996). “Reopening the Convergence Debate: A New Look at Cross-Country Growth Empirics,” Journal of Economic Growth 1, 363-389.Google Scholar
  18. Dasgupta, P., and D. Ray. (1986). “Inequality as a Determinant of Malnutrition and Unemployment: Theory,” The Economic Journal 96(384), 1011-1034.Google Scholar
  19. Deininger, K., and L. Squire. (1996). “A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality,” World Bank Economic Review 10, 565-591.Google Scholar
  20. Forbes, K. J. (2000). “A Reassessment of the Relationship Between Inequality and Growth,” American Economic Review 90(4), 869-887.Google Scholar
  21. Galor, O., and J. Zeira. (1993). “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics,” Review of Macroeconomic Studies 60, 35-52.Google Scholar
  22. Greenwood, J., and B. Jovanovic. (1999). “The Information Technology Revolution and the Stock Market,” American Economic Review 89(2), 116-122.Google Scholar
  23. Hausman, J. A., and W. Newey. (1995). “Nonparametric Estimation of Exact Consumers Surplus and Deadweight Loss,” Econometrica 63(6), 1445-1476.Google Scholar
  24. Krueger, A., and M. Lindahl. (2001). “Education for Growth: Why and for Whom?” Journal of Economic Literature 39(4), 1101-1136.Google Scholar
  25. Li, Hongyi, and Heng-fu Zou. (1998). “Income Inequality is not Harmful for Growth: Theory and Evidence,” Review of Development Economics 2(3), 318-334.Google Scholar
  26. Perotti, R. (1996). “Growth, Income Distribution and Democracy,” Journal of Economic Growth 1, 149-187.Google Scholar
  27. Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. (1991). “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence,” American Economic Review 48, 600-621.Google Scholar
  28. Piketty, T. (1997). “The Dynamics of the Wealth Distribution and the Interest Rate with Credit Rationing,” Review of Economic Studies 64(2), 173-189.Google Scholar
  29. Porter, J. (1996). “Essays in Econometrics,” PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, P. (1988). “Root-n Consistent Semiparametric Regressions,” Econometrica 56, 931-954.Google Scholar
  31. Srinivasan, T. N. (1994). “Destitution: A Discourse,” Journal of Economic Literature 32(4), 1842-1855.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abhijit V. Banerjee
    • 1
  • Esther Duflo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsMITUSA

Personalised recommendations