Minds and Machines

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 553–566

An Information Continuum Conjecture

  • Ken Herold
Article

Abstract

Turing tersely mentioned a notion of ``cultural search'' while otherwise deeply engaged in the design and operations of one of the earliest computers. His idea situated the individual squarely within a collaborative intellectual environment, but did he mean to suggest this in the form of a general information system? In the same writing Turing forecast mechanizations of proofs and outlined genetical searches, much later implemented in cellular automata. The conjecture explores the networked data-information-knowledge continuum as the subject of Turing's notions of search and intelligence, using analogous models from library systems theory. Floridi's philosophy of information is posed as a potential guide to applied information services design of the Turing type. The initial problem is to identify a minimal set of assumptions from Turing's essay beyond the general context of computing. This set will form a bridge to an analogous set of principles in library systems models by eliciting supporting evidence in the literature relating the two. Finally it will be shown how Floridi's philosophy of information more fully encompasses Turing's insight in view of the conjecture.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albrechtsen, H. and Jacob, E.K. (1998), ‘The Dynamics of Classification System as Boundary Objects for Cooperation in the Electronic Library’, Library Trends 47(2), pp. 293–312.Google Scholar
  2. Arms, W.Y., Blanchi, C., and Overly, E.A. (1997), ‘An Architecture for Information in Digital Libraries’ D-Lib Magazine, February.Google Scholar
  3. Ashenhurst, R.L. (1996), ‘Ontological Aspects of Information Modeling’, Minds and Machines 6, pp. 287–394.Google Scholar
  4. Blair, D.C. (2002), ‘Information Retrieval and the Philosophy of Language’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37.Google Scholar
  5. Bonnevie, E. (2001), ‘Dretske's Semantic Information Theory and Meta-Theories in Library and Information Science’ Journal of Documentation 57(4), pp. 519–534.Google Scholar
  6. Buckland, M. (1997), ‘What is a ‘Document?’ Journal of the American Society of Information Science 48(9).Google Scholar
  7. Budd, J. (2001), Knowledge and Knowing in Library and Information Science: A Philosophical Framework, Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  8. Capurro, R. and Hjørland, B. (2002), ‘The Concept of Information’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37.Google Scholar
  9. Churchman, C.W. (1971), The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Cornelius, I. (2002), ‘Theorizing Information for Information Science’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36.Google Scholar
  11. Davenport, E. (1992), ‘What Do We Do When We Do Information Science?” in P. Vakkari and B. Cronin, eds., Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Historical, Empirical, and Theoretical Perspectives, London, Los Angeles: T. Graham.Google Scholar
  12. Dovey, M.J. (1999), ‘Meta-Objects: An Object Oriented Approach to Metadata’, Ariadne 19 (March).Google Scholar
  13. Engelbart, D.C. (1992), ‘Toward High-Performance Organizations: A Strategic Role for Groupware', Bootstrap Institute, June.Google Scholar
  14. Floridi, L. (1999), Philosophy and Computing: An Introduction, London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Floridi, L. (2002) ‘On Defining Library and Information Science as Applied Philosophy of Information’, Social Epistemology 16(11), pp. 37–49Google Scholar
  16. Floridi, L. (2003), ‘On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(4), pp. 287–304Google Scholar
  17. Floridi, L. (2004), ‘Open Problems in the Philosophy of Information’, Metaphilosophy 35(3).Google Scholar
  18. Floridi, L. and Sanders J. (2003), ‘Internet Ethics: The Constructionist Values of Homo Poieticus', in R. Cavalier, The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  19. Giere, R.N. (2002), ‘Models as Parts of Distributed Cognitive Systems', in Magnani and Nersessian, eds., Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values, New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers/Plenum.Google Scholar
  20. Herold, K.R. (2001), ‘Librarianship and the Philosophy of Information’, Library Philosophy and Practice 3(2), [http://www.uidaho.edu/ mbolin/herold.pdf].Google Scholar
  21. Hjørland, B. (1998), ‘Information Retrieval, Text Composition, and Semantics’, Knowledge Organization 25(1/2), pp. 16–31.Google Scholar
  22. Hjørland, B. (2000), ‘Library and Information Science: Practice, Theory, and Philosophical Basis’, Information Processing and Management 36, pp. 501–531.Google Scholar
  23. Hodges, A. (1983), Alan Turing: The Enigma, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  24. Howe, D. (1994), ‘The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing', 1993–2001.Google Scholar
  25. IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC), IEEE P1484.12 Learning Object Metadata Working Group. Standard for Information Technology — Education and Training Systems — Learning Objects and Metadata. Approved 10 December 2002. [http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/]Google Scholar
  26. Ingwersen (2001), ‘Cognitive Information Retrieval’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 34, pp. 1999–2000.Google Scholar
  27. Kircz, J.G. (2001), ‘New Practices for Electronic Publishing 1: Will the Scientific Paper Keep Its Form?’ Learned Publishing 14 (October).Google Scholar
  28. Kircz, J.G. (2002), ‘New Practices for Electronic Publishing 2: New Forms of the Scientific Paper’, Learned Publishing 15(1), (January).Google Scholar
  29. Kochen, M. (1962), ‘Adaptive Mechanisms in Digital ‘Concept’ Processing', in The Growth of Knowledge: Readings on Organization and Retrieval of Information, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Kochen (1966), ‘Systems Technology for Information Retrieval’ in The Growth of Knowledge: Readings on Organization and Retrieval of Information, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Kochen (1974), Principle of Information Retrieval, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Le Boeuf, P. (2001), ‘FRBR and Further’, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 32(4).Google Scholar
  33. Lubetzky and Hayes (1969), ‘Bibliographic Dimensions in Information Control’, American Documentation 20(3), (July).Google Scholar
  34. Lynch, M. (1997), ‘Towards a Paradigm of Information System’, Philosophical Aspects of Information Systems. Winder, Probert and Beeson, eds., London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  35. Maly, K., Nelson, M.L. and Zubair, M. (1999), ‘Smart Objects, Dumb Archives: A User-Centric, Layered Digital Library Framework’, D-Lib Magazine 5(3), (March).Google Scholar
  36. Mooers, C. (1951), ‘Information Retrieval Viewed as Temporal Signalling', in International Congress of Mathematicians. Cambridge, Mass., 1950. Proceedings, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, vol. 1.Google Scholar
  37. Nitecki, J.Z. (1993), Metalibrarianship: A Model for Intellectual Foundations of Library Information Science. http://www7.twu.edu/library/nitecki/metalibrarianship/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  38. Nitecki, J.Z. (1995), Philosophical Aspects of Library Information Science in Retrospect. http://www7.twu.edu/library/nitecki/aspects/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  39. Nitecki, Joseph Z. (1997), Philosophical Ancestry of the American Library Informationhttp://www7.twu.edu/library/nitecki/ancestry/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  40. Nitecki, J.Z. (1998), ‘Conceptual Aspects of Bibliothecal Communication; Philosophical Legacy of the Twentieth Century American Librarianship’, Public Library Quarterly 17(1).Google Scholar
  41. Peckham, J. and Maryanski, F. (1988), ‘Semantic Data Models’, ACM Computing Surveys 20(3) (September).Google Scholar
  42. Reinhardt, A. (1994), ‘Managing the New Document’, Byte 19(8), (August).Google Scholar
  43. Renear, A., Mylonas, E. and Durand, D. (1996) ‘Refining our Notion of What Text Really Is: The Problem of Overlapping Hierarchies', in N. Ide and S. Hockey, eds., Research in Humanities Computing, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sloman, A. (1978), The Computer Revolution in Philosophy, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  45. Smiraglia, R.P. (2002), Special Issue on Works as Entities for Information Retrieval, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 33(3/4).Google Scholar
  46. Smith, B. (2003), ‘Ontology', in L. Floridi ed., Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  47. Sowa, J.F. (2002), ‘Architectures for Intelligent Systems', Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence, IBM Systems Journal 41(3), pp. 331–349.Google Scholar
  48. Steinhart, E. (1998), ‘Digital Metaphysics', in T.W. Bynum and J.H. Moor, eds., The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are Changing Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Turing, A.M. (1948) ‘Intelligent Machinery', Technical Report, National Physical Laboratory. (Written in September, 1947). In Machine Intelligence 5. Edinburgh University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  50. Van den Akker, J. and Siebes, A. (1997), ‘Degas: A Database of Autonomous Objects’, Information Systems 22(2/3), pp. 121–138.Google Scholar
  51. Veltman, K. (1999), Frontiers in Conceptual Navigation 2: Interfaces for Cultural Heritage, Totonto: Ontario Library Association.Google Scholar
  52. Vickery, B.C. (1973), ‘The Nature of Information Science', in C.H. Rawski, ed., Toward a Theory of Librarianship: Papers in Honor of Jesse Hauk Shera, Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.Google Scholar
  53. Von Foerster, H. (1971), ‘Technology: What Will It Mean to Librarians [A Response]', in Observing Systems, 2nd edition, Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.Google Scholar
  54. Weinberg, A. (1963). ‘Science, Government, and Information', in Science, Government, and Information: The Responsibilities of the Technical Community and the Government in the Transfer of Information. President's Science Advisory Council, U.S.: Government Printing Office. Washington, DC, pp. 7–37.Google Scholar
  55. Weyrauch, R. (1991), ‘Ideas on Building Conscious Artifacts', Edited version of talk given to the Workshop on Consciousness, Venice, June 1991. http://www-formal.stanford.edu/FOL/rww-91con-work [retrieved 1/29/2003]Google Scholar
  56. Williams, J.G. (1996), ‘Information Science: A Proposed Model for Curriculum Development’ in Information Science: Still An Emerging Discipline, Pittsburgh: Cathedral Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken Herold
    • 1
  1. 1.Burke LibraryHamiliton CollegeClintonUSA

Personalised recommendations