Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an Academic Engineering Course

  • Moti Frank
  • Ilana Lavy
  • David Elata


This paper presents perceptions and attitudes of freshmen students that have participated in an introductory Project-Based Learning (PBL) course in engineering. The course, `A creative introduction to mechanical engineering', was developed and is taught in the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering at the Technion. In this course, teams of students carry out mini-projects that require the design and construction of devices that perform pre-defined tasks. The qualitative paradigm was found to be suitable for studying the process undergone by the students, mainly because the study focused on the human aspect — the students' emotions, thoughts, behavior, and difficulties. Data was collected by means of semi-structured interviews with the students, the teacher, and the teaching-assistant, by observations in the classroom, and by analyzing students' reports. The paper presents the students' perceptions of: the aim of the course; the instructor's role in a PBL environment; characteristics of PBL course; advantages of the PBL from the students' point of view; PBL as a learning environment for future engineers, and implications of learning in teams.

engineering design engineering education learning environment project-based learning qualitative research 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barak, M.: 2002, ‘Learning Good Electronics or Coping with Challenging Tasks: The Priorities of Excellent Students', Journal of Technology Education 14(1), 20–34.Google Scholar
  2. Barak, M. & Goffer, N.: 2002, ‘Fostering Systematic Innovative Thinking and Problem Solving: Lessons Education Can Learn From Industry', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 12(3), 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cobern, W.: 1993, ‘Contextual Constructivism: The Impact of Culture on the Learning and Teaching of Science', in K. G. Tobin (ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  4. Denzin, N. & Lincoln Y.: 1994, ‘Entering the Field of Qualitative Research', in N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Elata, D. & Garaway, I.: 2002, ‘A Creative Introduction to Mechanical Engineering’, Int. J. of Eng. Education 18(5).Google Scholar
  6. Fosnot, C. T.: 1996, ‘Constructivism: A Psychological theory of Learning', in C. T. Fosnot (ed.), Constructivism: Theory, Perspective and Practice, Teacher College, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Frank, M.: 1999, Engineering Systems Thinking-Characteristics and Learning Processes, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Education in Technology and Science, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology (In Hebrew, abstract in English), Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
  8. Fullan, M.: 2001, Leading in a Culture of Change, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Fullan, M.: 1997, ‘The Complexity of the Process', in M. Fullan (ed.), The Challenge of School Change: A Collection of Articles, Skylight Training and Publishing, Arlington, IL.Google Scholar
  10. Glasersfeld, E. V.: 1995, ‘A constructivist Approach to Teaching’ in P. Leslie & J. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education, Hillsdale, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  11. Goodlad, J.: 1987, The Ecology of School Renewal, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Green, A. M.: ‘Project-Based-Learning: Moving Students Toward Meaningful Learning', ERIC Database, ED422466.Google Scholar
  13. Haury, D. L.: 1993, Teaching Science through Inquiry, ERIC Digest.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, A. M.: 1999, ‘Community-Based Projects in Technology Education: An Approach for Relevant Learning', in W. E. Theuerkauf & M. J. Dyrenfurth (eds.), International Perspectives on Technological Education: Outcomes and Futures, Ames, Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
  15. Hill A. M.: 1998, ‘Problem Solving in Real-Life Contexts: Alternatives for Design in Technology Education', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 8(3), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill, A. M.: 1997, ‘Reconstructionism in Technology Education', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7(1–2), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hill, A. M. & Hopkins, D.: 1999, ‘University/school Collaboration in Teacher Education', in M. Lang, J. Olson, H. Hansen & W. Bunde (eds.), Changing Schools/Changing Practices: Perspectives on Educational Reform and Teacher Professionalism, Garant, Louvain, France, 171–182.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, A. M. & Smith, H. A.: 1998, ‘Practices Meets Theory in Technological Education: A Case of Authentic Learning in the High School Setting', Journal of Technology Education 9(1), 29–41.Google Scholar
  19. Jewell, L. N. & Reitz, H. J.: 1984, Group Effectiveness in Organization, Warner Books, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C. & Berger, C.: 1999, Teaching Science: A Project-Based Approach, McGraw-Hill College, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Larson, E.C. & La Fasto, F.: 1989, Team Work. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Orevi, N. & Dannon, R.: 1999, ‘Learning Ecology with Educational Technologies', paper presented at the International Workshop on Science Teachers Education toward the New Millenium, Technion-Department of Education in Technology and Science, January 5–6, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenfeld, M. & Rosenfeld, S.: 1999, ‘Understanding the Surprise in PBL: An Exploration into the Learning Styles of Teachers and Their Students', paper presented at the 8th Conference of EARLI (European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction), Goteburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
  24. Senge, P. M.: 1994, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Sergiovanni, T. J.: 1990, Value-Added Leadership: How to get Extraordinary Performance in School, Harcourt Brace, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  26. Shepherd, H. G.: 1998, ‘The Probe Method: A Project-Based-Learning Model's Effect on Critical Thinking Skills', Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A 59(3A), 779.Google Scholar
  27. Tamir, P.: 1990, ‘Considering the Role of Invitations to Inquiry in Science Teaching and in Teacher Education', Journal of Science Teacher Education 1(3), 41–45.Google Scholar
  28. Thomas, J. W., A Review of Research on Project-Based-Learning. Available at: Scholar
  29. Turnball, W.: 2002, ‘The Place of Authenticity in Technology in The New Zealand Curriculum', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 12(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vygotsky, L. S.: 1986, Thought and Language. Translated by A. Kozulin, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (Original English translation published 1962.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moti Frank
    • 1
  • Ilana Lavy
    • 1
  • David Elata
    • 1
  1. 1.Technion – Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations