Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 256, Issue 2, pp 455–462 | Cite as

Microtome sectioning causes artifacts in rhizobox experiments

  • Walter J. Fitz
  • Walter W. Wenzel
  • Gottfried Wieshammer
  • Blaž Istenič
Article

Abstract

Experimental data on rhizosphere characteristics at high spatial resolution are required to improve our knowledge on phytoavailability of nutrients and pollutants. In numerous studies, sectioning using refrigerated microtomes has been employed to obtain thin soil layers at defined distances from the root surface. In this study, we assessed the effect of thin slicing and freezing on soil chemical characteristics. Two experimental soils were frozen at −20 °C and sliced using a refrigerated microtome. In general, chemical changes relative to the non-sliced control were more pronounced as the trim thickness (thickness of a single slice) decreased. Maximum increases in pH and electrical conductivity (EC) for the smallest trim thickness used (20 μm) were 0.9 units and 50%, respectively. Extractable fractions of P (0.5 M NaHCO3) K, Mg, Mn, Na and Si (1 M NH4NO3) increased up to 40, 91, 19, 621, 50 and 100%, respectively. Based on these results, we suggest to use a trim thickness of ≥ 200 μm. Apart from slicing, freezing (a prerequisite for the microtome technique) was found to bias soil chemical parameters. To circumvent microtome-related artifacts we present a home-made slicing device as a cost-effective alternative, which allows sectioning of non-frozen rhizosphere soil employing one single slice.

artifacts freezing microtome rhizosphere slicing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asmar F, Gahoonia T S and Nielsen N E 1995 Barley genotypes differ in activity of soluble extracellular phosphatase and depletion of organic phosphorus in the rhizosphere soil. Plant Soil 172, 117–122.Google Scholar
  2. Badalucco L, Kuikman P J and Nannipieri P 1996 Protease and deaminase activities in wheat rhizosphere and their relation to bacterial and protozoan populations. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 23, 99–104.Google Scholar
  3. Bhadoria P B S, Kaselowsky J, Claassen N and Junk A 1991 Soil phosphate diffusion coefficients: Their dependence on phosphorus concentration and buffer power. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 56–60.Google Scholar
  4. Blum W E H, Spiegel H and Wenzel W W 1996 Bodenzustandsinventur, Konzeption und Durchführung. Bundesminsterium für Land und Forstwirtschaft and Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Verkehr und Kunst, Vienna, A. 102 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Blume H-P, Brümmer G, Schwertmann U, Kögel-Knabner I, Wilke B-M and Stahr K 2002 Scheffer/Schachtschabel: Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, D.Google Scholar
  6. Brandstetter A, Sletten R S, Mentler A and Wenzel W W 1996 Estimating dissolved organic carbon in natural waters by UV absorbance (254 nm). Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 159, 605–607.Google Scholar
  7. Clemensson-Lindel A and Persson H 1992 Effects of freezing on rhizosphere and root nutrient content using two soil sampling methods. Plant Soil 139, 39–45.Google Scholar
  8. DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung) 1995 DIN V 19730 Bodenbeschaffenheit, Extraktion von Spurenelementen mit Ammoniumnitratlösung. Beuth Verlag. Berlin.Google Scholar
  9. Dormaar J F 1988 Effect of plant roots on chemical and biological properties of surrounding discrete soil zones. Can. J. Soil Sci. 68, 233–242.Google Scholar
  10. Farr E, Vaidyanathan L V and Nye P H 1969 Measurement of ionic concentration gradients in soils near roots. Soil Sci. 107, 385–391.Google Scholar
  11. Friedel J K, Kobel C, Pfeffer M, Fitz W J and Wenzel W W 2003 Effects of different freezing methods on estimates of soil microbial biomass N by fumigation-extraction. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 166, 326–327Google Scholar
  12. Fitz W J and Wenzel W W 2002 Arsenic transformations in the soil – rhizosphere – plant System: Fundamentals and potential application to phytoremediation. J. Biotechnol. 99, 259–278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gahoonia T S 1993 Influence of root-induced pH on the solubility of soil aluminium in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 149, 289–291.Google Scholar
  14. Gahoonia T S and Nielsen N E 1991 A method to study rhizosphere processes in thin soil layers of different proximity to roots. Plant Soil. 135, 143–146.Google Scholar
  15. Gahoonia T S and Nielsen N E 1992a Control of pH at the soil-root interface. Plant Soil 140, 49–54.Google Scholar
  16. Gahoonia T S and Nielsen N E 1992b The effects of root-induced pH changes on the depletion of inorganic and organic phosphorus in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 143, 185–191.Google Scholar
  17. Gahoonia T S and Nielsen N E 1996 Variation in acquisition of soil phosphorous among wheat and barley genotypes. Plant Soil. 178, 223–230.Google Scholar
  18. Gahoonia T S and Nielsen N E 1997 Variation in root hairs of barley cultivars doubled soil phosphorus uptake. Euphytica 98, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gahoonia T S, Claassen N and Jungk A 1992 Mobilization of phosphate in different soils by ryegrass supplied with ammonium or nitrate. Plant Soil 140, 241–248.Google Scholar
  20. Gahoonia T S, Raza S and Nielsen N E 1994 Phosphorus depletion in the rhizosphere as influenced by soil moisture. Plant Soil 159, 213–218.Google Scholar
  21. Gahoonia T S, Nielsen N E, Joshi P A and Jahoor A 2001 A root hairless barley mutant for elucidating genetic of root hairs and phosphorus uptake. Plant Soil 235, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaillard V, Chenu C, Recous S and Richard G 1999 Carbon, nitrogen and microbial gradients induced by plant residues decomposing in soil. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 50, 567–578.Google Scholar
  23. Hedley M J, Kirk G J and Santos M B 1994. Phosphorous efficiency and the forms of soil phosphorous utilized by upland rice cultivars. Plant Soil 158, 53–62.Google Scholar
  24. Hinsinger P and Gilkes R J 1995 Root-induced dissolution of phospate rock in the rhizosphere of lupins grown in alkaline soil. Aust. J. Soil Res. 33, 477–489.Google Scholar
  25. Hsieh J J C, Gardner W H and Campbell G S 1972 Experimental control of soil water content in the vicinity if root hairs. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 418–421.Google Scholar
  26. Joner E J, Magid J, Gahoonia T S and Jakobsen I 1995 P depletion and activity of phosphatases in the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 9. 1145–1151.Google Scholar
  27. Kandeler E, Luxhøi J, Tscherko D and Magid J 1999 Xylanase, invertase and protease at the soil-litter interface of a loamy sand. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 1171–1179.Google Scholar
  28. Kandeler E, Marschner P, Tscherko D, Gahoonia T S and Nielsen N E 2002 Microbial community composition and functional diversity in the rhizosphere of maize. Plant Soil 238, 301–312.Google Scholar
  29. Kaselowsky J, Bhadoria P B S, Claassen N and Junk A 1990 A method for determining phosphate diffusion coefficients by bulk diffusion in soil. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 153, 89–91.Google Scholar
  30. Kuchenbuch R and Junk A 1982 A method for determining concentration profiles at the soil-root interface by thin slicing rhizospheric soil. Plant Soil 68, 391–394.Google Scholar
  31. Kuchenbuch R and Jungk A 1984 Wirkung der Kaliumdüngung auf die Kaliumverfügbarkeit in der Rhizosphäre von Raps. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 147, 435–448.Google Scholar
  32. Li X-L, George E and Marschner H 1991 Phosphorus depletion and pH decrease at the root-soil and hyphae-soil interface of VA mycorrhizal white clover fertilized with ammonium. New Phytol. 119, 397–404.Google Scholar
  33. Marschner H 1995 Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic press, London.Google Scholar
  34. Mueller T, Joergensen R G and Meyer B 1992 Estimation of soil microbial biomass C in the presence of living roots by fumigation-extraction. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 179–181.Google Scholar
  35. Paul E A and Clark F E 1996 Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  36. Tarafdar J C and Jungk A 1987 Phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere and its relation to the depletion of soil organic phosphorus. Biol. Fertil. Soils 3, 199–201.Google Scholar
  37. Tarafdar J C and Marschner H 1994 Phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere and hyphosphere of VA mycorrhizal wheat supplied with inorganic and organic phosphorus. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 387–395.Google Scholar
  38. van Reeuwijk L P 1995 Procedures for soil analysis. ISRIC (International Soil Reference and Information Centre), Wageningen, NL.Google Scholar
  39. Wenzel W W, Sletten R S, Brandstetter A, Wieshammer G and Stingeder G 1997 Adsorption of trace metals by tension lysimeters: Nylon membrane vs. porous ceramic cup. J. Environ. Qual. 26, 1430–1434.Google Scholar
  40. Wenzel W W, Lombi E and Adriano D C 1999 Biogeochemical processes in the rhizosphere: Role in Phytoremediation of metalpolluted soils. In Heavy Metal Stress in Plants. Eds. M N V Prasad and J Hagemeyer. pp. 271–303. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  41. Wenzel W W, Wieshammer G, Fitz W J and Puschenreiter M 2001 Novel Rhizobox design to assess rhizosphere characteristics at high spatial resolution. Plant Soil 237, 37–45.Google Scholar
  42. Youssef R A and Chino M 1988 Development of a new rhizobox system to study the nutrient status in the rhizosphere. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 34, 461–465.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter J. Fitz
    • 1
  • Walter W. Wenzel
    • 1
  • Gottfried Wieshammer
    • 2
  • Blaž Istenič
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna – BOKU, Institute of Soil ScienceViennaAustria
  2. 2.Technisches Büro für BodenkulturViennaAustria
  3. 3.Biotechnical faculty, Agronomy Department, Center for Soil and Environmental scienceUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations