Plant and Soil

, Volume 255, Issue 1, pp 189–200

Genotypic and environmental variations in root morphology in rice genotypes under upland field conditions

  • M. Kondo
  • P.P. Pablico
  • D.V. Aragones
  • R. Agbisit
  • J. Abe
  • S. Morita
  • B. Courtois
Article

Abstract

Improving the water capturing capacity of its large and deep root system is required to stabilize the yield of upland rice in drought-prone areas in the tropics. For the improvement of the root system through breeding and soil management, it is critical to understand the relative importance of genotypic and environmental effect and their interaction on the root development under various soil conditions and agronomic management. This study aimed to quantify and characterize the effect of genotype and environment, soils and N application levels (0 and 90 kg N ha−1) in the variations of the traits related to the size and distribution of the root system at the flowering stage using 11 rice genotypes in upland fields in southern Luzon in the Philippines. The results indicated that, among the root traits, the genotypic factor accounted for the largest portion of variation for the number of nodal roots, specific root weight (SRW), and R/S ratio, whereas the environmental effect was relatively large for deep root length ratio (DRR) and total root dry weight (RDW). Especially, the DRR, the ratio of root length at deeper than 30 cm per unit area to the RDW, was strongly affected by the site. Nitrogen application increased RDW without a substantial change in the R/S ratio and DRR. On the other hand, significant genotypic variations of RDW and DRR were obtained, which may imply the opportunity for the genetic improvement. Japonica upland varieties showed a large RDW (90–111 g m−2) associated with high R/S ratio (0.18–0.23) and a high SRW (0.26–0.27 mg cm−1), whereas aus (Dular) and indica (Vandana) upland varieties had a large DRR (12.5–13.8 m g−1) with a medium R/S ratio (0.14–0.17), suggesting an efficient formation of a deep root system with a limited biomass allocation to the roots. In addition, the analysis of G × E interaction term for RDW by an Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) model indicated that the response to soil conditions also differed between these groups. This indicated that proper deployment of genotype to the given soil conditions is also important to maximize the expression of genotypic potentials.

G × E interaction N application root distribution root system upland rice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angus J F S, Hasegawa S, Hsiao T C, Liboon S P and Zandstra H G 1983 The water balance of post-monsoonal dryland crops. J. Agric. Sci.101, 699-710.Google Scholar
  2. Armenta-Soto J, Chang T, Loresto G C and O'Toole J C 1983 Genetic analysis of root characters in rice. SABRAO J. 15: 103-116.Google Scholar
  3. Champoux M C, Wang G, Sarkarung S, Mackil D J, O'Toole J C, Huang N and McCouch S R 1995 Locating genes associated with root morphology and drought avoidance in rice via linkage to molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90, 969-981.Google Scholar
  4. Chang T T and Vergara B S 1975 Varietal diversity and morphoagronomic characteristics of upland rice. In Major Research in Upland Rice. pp. 72-90. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.Google Scholar
  5. Chang T T, Armenta-Soto J L, Mao C X, Peiris R and Loresto G C 1985 Genetic studies on the components of drought resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). In Rice Genetics. pp. 387-398. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
  6. Courtois B, Chaitep W, Moolsri S, Sinha P K, Trebuil G and Yadav R 1996 Drought resistance and germplasm improvement: on-going research in the Upland Rice Research Consortium. In Upland Research in Partnership, IRRI Discussion Paper Series No.16. Eds. C Piggin, B Courtois and V Schmit. pp. 154-175. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
  7. Courtois B and Lafitte R 1999 Improving rice for drought-prone upland lowland environments. In Genetic Improvement of Rice for Water-Limited Environments. Eds. O Ito, J C O'Toole and B Hardy. pp. 35-56. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
  8. Crossa J, Gauch H G Jr and Zobel R W 1990 Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Sci. 30, 493-500.Google Scholar
  9. Fukai S and Inthapan P 1988 Growth and yield of rice cultivars under sprinkler irrigation in south-eastern Queensland. 3. Water extraction and plant water relations-comparison with maize and grain sorghum. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 28, 249-252.Google Scholar
  10. Gauch H G Jr 1992 Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 278p.Google Scholar
  11. Gupta P C and O'Toole J C 1986 Landscape and soils. In Upland Rice: a Global Perspective. pp. 41-62. International Rice Research Institute. Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
  12. Howeler R H 1991 Identifying plants adaptable to low pH conditions. In Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH. Eds R J Wright and V C Baligar. pp. 885-904. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  13. IRRI 1997 Rice Almanac, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
  14. IRRI 2000 IRRISTAT for Windows. Version 4.0, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
  15. Kondo M, Aguilar A, Abe J and Morita S 2000a Anatomy of nodal roots in tropical upland and lowland rice varieties. Plant Prod. Sci. 3, 437-445.Google Scholar
  16. Kondo M, Aragones D and Murty M V R 2000b Characteristics of root growth and water uptake from soil in upland rice and maize under water stress. Soil Sci. Plant Nutri. 46, 721-732.Google Scholar
  17. Mambani B and Lal R 1983 Response of upland rice varieties to drought stress. III. Estimating root system configuration from soil moisture data. Plant Soil 73, 95-104.Google Scholar
  18. Morita S, Nemoto K, Hu D X, Haruki Y and Yamazaki K 1989 A rapid method for estimating stem diameter in rice plants. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 58, 143-144. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  19. Morita S, Yamada S, Nakagawa J, Nemoto K and Abe J 1993. Morphological diversity of rice. 3. Varietal differences in root system development.. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 62, Extra issue 1, 248-249. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  20. Morita S, Yamada S and Abe J 1994. Morphological diversity of rice. 7.Development of varietal difference in root system morphology. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 63, Extra issue 1, 214-215. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  21. Morita S, Hagiwara Y and Abe J 1997 Relations of number and size of phytomer to total root length of rice plants grown in pot under different conditions. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 66, Extra issue 1, 198-199.(in Japanese).Google Scholar
  22. Nemoto K, Morita S and Baba T 1995 Shoot and root development in rice related to the phyllochron. Crop Sci. 35, 24-29.Google Scholar
  23. O'Toole J C 1982 Adaptation of rice to drought-prone environments. In Drought Resistance in Crops with Emphasis on Rice. pp. 195-213. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
  24. O'Toole J C and Bland W L 1987 Genetic variation in crop plant root system. Adv. Agron. 41, 91-145.Google Scholar
  25. Ray J D, Yu L, McCouch M C, Wang G and Nguyen H T 1996 Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with root penetration in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92, 627-636.Google Scholar
  26. Richards R A and Passioura J B 1981 Seminal root morphology and water use of wheat. I. Environmental effects. Crop Sci. 21, 249-252.Google Scholar
  27. Tennant D 1975 A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 6, 995-1001.Google Scholar
  28. Widawsky D A and O'Toole J C 1996 Prioritizing the rice research agenda for eastern India. In Rice Research in Asia: Progress and Priorities. Eds. R E Everson, R W Herdt and M Hossain. pp. 109-130. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
  29. Yadav R, Courtois, B, Huang N and McLaren G 1997 Mapping genes controlling root morphology and root distribution in a double-haploid population of rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94, 619-632.Google Scholar
  30. Yamazaki K and Nemoto K 1986 Morphological trends and interrelationships of leaves, stem parts and roots along the main axes of rice plants. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 55, 236-243. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  31. Yambao E B, Ingram K T and Real J G 1992 Root xylem influence on the water relations and drought resistance of rice. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 925-932.Google Scholar
  32. Yoshida S 1975 Factors that limit the growth and yield of upland rice. In Major Research in Upland Rice. pp. 46-71. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
  33. Yoshida S and Hasegawa S 1982 The rice root system: its development and function. In Drought Resistance in Crops with Emphasis on Rice. pp. 97-114. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
  34. Zobel R W 1991 Genetic control of root systems. In Plant Roots, The Hidden Half. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp. 27-38. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Kondo
    • 1
  • P.P. Pablico
    • 2
  • D.V. Aragones
    • 2
  • R. Agbisit
    • 2
  • J. Abe
    • 3
  • S. Morita
    • 3
  • B. Courtois
    • 4
  1. 1.National Agricultural Research CenterTsukuba, IbarakiJapan
  2. 2.International Rice Research InstituteLos Baños, LagunaPhilippines
  3. 3.The University of TokyoBunkyo-ku, TokyoJapan
  4. 4.CIRAD-CAMontpellier Cedex 1France

Personalised recommendations