Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 523–535 | Cite as

Zoophilia in Men: A Study of Sexual Interest in Animals

Article

Abstract

This article presents a study of 114 self-defined zoophile men who were researched primarily through the use of an on-line questionnaire. We describe how the participants acquired the identity label of zoophile, what it meant to them, and their relationships among themselves. Also examined are how they eroticized animals and how human and feral characteristics combined to form this object choice. Finally, participants' sexual profiles with animals and humans, and how the balance of animal and human desires creates different forms of zoophilia, are described.

zoophilia bestiality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Mittleman, M., & Rouleau, J. L. (1988). Multiple paraphilic diagnoses among sex offenders. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry, and Law, 16, 153–168.Google Scholar
  2. Allgeier, E. R., & Allgeier, A. R. (2000). Sexual interactions (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez, W. A., & Freinhar, J. P. (1991). A prevalence study of bestiality (zoophilia) in psychiatric in-patients, medical in-patients, and psychiatric staff. International Journal of Psychosomatics, 38, 45–47.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic, and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  5. Beastly passions. (2000, December 3). The Independent on Sunday, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, A. M., & Katcher, A. H. (1996). Between pets, and people. The importance of animal companionship. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beirne, P. (2000). Rethinking bestiality: Towards a concept of interspecies sexual assault. In A. L. Podberscek, E. S. Paul, & J. A. Serpell (Eds.), Companion animals, and us: Exploring the relationships between people, and pets (pp. 313–331). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bryant, C. D., & Snizek, W. (1993). On the trail of the centaur. Society, 30, 25–35.Google Scholar
  9. Cornog, M., & Perper, T. (1994). Bestiality. In V. L. Bullough & B. Bullough (Eds.), Human sexuality: An encyclopedia (pp. 60–63). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  10. Dekkers, M. (2000). Dearest pet. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Durkin, K. F., & Bryant, C. D. (2002). Log on to sex: Erotic cyberspace as a new frontier. In R. Weitzer (Ed.), Deviance, and social control (pp. 185–194). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Earls, C. M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2000). A case study of preferential bestiality (zoophilia). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research, and Treatment, 14, 83–88.Google Scholar
  13. Gebhard, P. H. (1965). Situational factors affecting human sexual behavior. In F. A. Beach (Ed.), Sex, and behavior (pp. 483–495). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Holmes, S. T., & Holmes, R. M. (2002). Sex crimes: Patterns, and behavior (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Home Office. (2000). Setting the boundaries: Reforming the law on sex offences. London: Home Office Communications Directorate.Google Scholar
  16. Humane Society of the United States. (2001). Available from www.hsus.orgGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunt, M. M. (1974). Sexual behavior in the 1970's. Chicago: Playboy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ingold, T. (Ed.). (1994). What is an animal? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Jasper, J., & Nelkin, D. (1992). The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  21. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  22. Koch, S., & Schockman, H. E. (1998). Democratizing Internet access in the lesbian, gay, and bisexual communities. In B. Ebo (Ed.), Cyberghetto of cybertopia: Race, class, and gender on the Internet (pp. 170–184). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  23. Lenius, S. (2001). Bisexuals, and BDSM: Bisexual people in a pansexual community. Journal of Bisexuality, 1, 69–78.Google Scholar
  24. Masters, W., Johnson, V., & Kolodny, R. C. (1995). Human sexuality. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  25. Matthews, M. (1994). The horseman. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  26. Miletski, H. (2002). Understanding bestiality, and zoophilia. Germantown, MD: Ima Tek Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Page, G. H. (1999). Inside the animal mind. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Posner, R. A., & Silbaugh, K. B. (1996). A guide to America's sex laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ross, M., Tikkanen, T., & Mansson, S. A. (2000). Differences between internet samples, and conventional samples of men who have sex with men: Implications for research, and HIV interventions. Social Science, and Medicine, 51, 749–758.Google Scholar
  30. Roth, M. (1999, December 15). All opposed, say neigh. Riverfront Times, p. 10.Google Scholar
  31. Savishinsky, J. (1983). Pet ideas: The domestication of animals, human behavior, and human emotions. In A. H. Katcher & A. M. Beck (Eds.), New perspectives on our lives with companion animals (pp. 112–131). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  32. Singer, P. (2001). Retrieved from www.nerve.com/Opinions/Singer/heavyPetting/main.asp?Google Scholar
  33. Strong, B., DeVault, C., Sayad, B. W., & Yarber, W. L. (2002). Human sexuality: Diversity in contemporary America. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Thomas, K. (1983). Man, and the natural world. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  35. Walton, C. E. (2001). Bestiality. In C. D. Bryant (Ed.), Encyclopedia of criminology, and deviant behavior (pp. 19–22). Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., & Calhan, C. (1995). “If the shoe fits...”: Exploring male homosexual foot fetishism. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 17–27.Google Scholar
  37. Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., & Pryor, D. W. (1994). Dual attraction: Understanding bisexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyIndiana University-Purdue University at IndianapolisIndianapolis
  2. 2.Department of SociologyIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations