Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus

, Volume 3, Issue 5–6, pp 251–261 | Cite as

Determination of Nitrogen and Sulfur in Plants and Soils Sampled from the Area Near a Fertilizer Plant

  • A. Cicek


The purpose of this study was to investigate NOx and SO2-inducednitrogen and sulfur levels accumulated over vegetation and soil in the surrounds of the fertilizer plant in Kütahya, Turkey. Therefore, leaf samples collected from the seven locations adjacent to the plant were morphologically observed (pollution-related injuries and color deformation) and chemically analyzed. Besides, nitrogen and sulfur contents were determined in the soil samples collected from each location. A significant correlation was achieved between locations and different vegetation samples and soil samples. The highest nitrogen level present in the trees was 3.07 ± 0.105% (3rd location, Robinia pseudoacacia), with the highest sulfur level being 5.79 ± 0.085% (3rd location, Salix alba). The highest nitrogen and sulfur levels in soils were 0.31 ± 0.045 and 0.57 ± 0.052% (3rd location), respectively. Furthermore, the highest nitrogen and sulfur levels were 4.69 and 2.20%, respectively,in agricultural plants in the surrounds of the fertilizer plant. A higher level of pollutants was observed in the samples collectedfrom the locations in the direction of the prevailing wind. Also, differences between locations as well as between plant specimens were statistically evaluated.

accumulation fertilizer plant nitrogen vegetation soil pollution sulfur 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aksoy, A., Sahin, U. and Duman, F.: 2000, ‘Robinia pseudo-acacia L. as a possible biomonitor of heavy metal pollution in Kayseri’, Turk. J. Bot. 24(5), 279–284.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous: 1999, Kütahya İl Çevre Durum Raporu, Kütahya.Google Scholar
  3. Brenner, J. M.: 1965, ‘Total nitrogen’, in C. A. Black (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II, SSSA, Madison, Wis., pp. 1149–1178.Google Scholar
  4. Butters, B. and Chenery, E. M.: 1959, ‘A rapid method for the determination of total sulfur in soils and plants’, Analyst 84, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Henry, J. G. and Heinke, G. W.: 1996, Environmental Science and Engineering, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  6. Hortwitz, W. (ed.): 1970, Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC, 11th edn., Washington, D.C., pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  7. Kacar, B.: 1970, Bitki ve Toprağin Kimyasal Analizleri, Ankara Ñniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayinlari, No. 453, pp. 534–595.Google Scholar
  8. Kantarci, D. and Müezzinoğlu, A.: 1997, ‘Impacts of the three lignite-fired power plants on the forests at Mugla Region of Turkey’, in S. Incecik, E. Ekinci, F. Yardim and A. Bayram (eds.), Air Quality Management, Environmental Research Forum, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, Vol. 7–8, pp. 555–560.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, D. W., Susfalk, R. B., Brewer, P. F. and Swank, W. T.: 1999, ‘Simulated effects of reduced sulfur, nitrogen, and base caution deposition on soils and southern Appalachian forests’, J. Environ. Qual. 28(4), 1336–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Manahan, S. H.: 1997, Environmental Science and Technology, Air Pollution and its Control, Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  11. Massoumi, A. and Cornfield, A. H.: 1963, ‘A rapid method for the determining sulfate in water extracts of soils’, Analyst 88, 321–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mesanza, J. M., Casado, H. and Encinas, D.: 1996, ‘Effects of a sulfur dioxide episode on trees in the surrounding of a refinery’, J. Environ. Sci. Health A31(5), 1025–1033.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Cicek
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Applications and Research CenterAnadolu UniversityEskişehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations