Plant Ecology

, Volume 169, Issue 2, pp 171–177 | Cite as

Seed dispersal in Erythronium dens-canis L. (Liliaceae): variation among habitats in a myrmecochorous plant

  • Pablo Guitián
  • Mónica Medrano
  • Javier Guitián


Erythronium dens-canis is a geophyte which produces a single flower each season. The fruits produce small seeds with relatively large elaiosomes. We performed experiments to investigate primary and secondary seed dispersal mechanisms of this species in different habitats in the western part of the Cantabrian Range in northwest Spain. Sticky traps were used to measure primary dispersal of seeds up to 0.5 m from mother plants. Seed cafeteria experiments were performed in different habitats to examine the role of ants and rodents in secondary seed transport and seed predation. Our results indicate that: (a) primary seed dispersal is positively skewed (99% of seeds fall within 20 cm of the mother plant) and seed dispersal distances vary significantly among plants; (b) secondary dispersal is exclusively by myrmecochory, although the proportion of seeds removed by ants differs significantly among habitats; (c) ant species composition and abundances vary among habitats; and (d) freshly dropped seeds are more likely to be removed than seeds that have begun to dry out. We conclude that secondary dispersal of seeds is greatly influenced by habitat but not by small-scale microhabitat.

Ants Dispersal distances Myrmecochory Northwest Iberian Peninsula Spatial variation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beattie A.J. 1985. The Evolutionary Ecology of Ant-Plant Mutualism.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Beattie A.J. and Culver D.C. 1982. Inhumation: how ants and other invertebrates help seeds. Nature 297: 627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg R.Y. 1975. Myrmecochorous plants in Australia and their dispersal by ants. Australian Journal of Botany 23: 475–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buide M.L., Sánchez J.M. and Guitián J. 1998. Ecological characteristics of the flora of the Northwest Iberian Peninsula. Plant Ecology 135: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Culver D.C. and Beattie A.J. 1978. Myrmecochory in Viola: dynamics of seed-ant interactions in some West Virginia species.Journal of Ecology 66: 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fenster C.B. 1991. Gene flow in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae).I. Gene dispersal. Evolution 45: 398–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gorb E.V. and Gorb S.N. 2000. Effects of seed aggregation on the removal rates of elaiosome-bearing Chelidonium majus and Viola odorata seeds carried by Formica polyctena ants. Ecological Research 15: 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gorb S.N. and Gorb E.V. 1999. Effects of ant species composition on seed removal in deciduous forest in eastern Europe. Oikos 84: 110–118.Google Scholar
  9. Gorb S.N., Gorb E.V. and Sindarovskaya Y. 1997. Interaction between the non-myrmecochorous herb Galium aparine and the ant Formica polyctena. Plant Ecology 131: 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gorb S.N., Gorb E.V. and Punttila P. 2000. Effects of redispersal of seeds by ants on the vegetation pattern in a deciduous forest: A case study. Acta Oecologica 21: 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guitián J. and Sánchez J.M. 1992. Seed dispersal spectra of plant communities in the Iberian Peninsula. Vegetatio 98: 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guitián J., Guitián P., Medrano M. and Sánchez J.M. 1999. Variation in floral morphology and individual fecundity in Erythronium dens-canis (Liliaceae). Ecography 22: 708–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Handel S.N. and Beattie A.J. 1998. Semillas dispersadas por hormigas.In: Los Recursos de las Plantas. Investigación y Ciencia, Barcelona, pp. 36–43.Google Scholar
  14. Heithaus E.R. 1986. Seed dispersal mutualism and the population density of Asarum canadense, an ant-dispersed plant. In: Estrada A. and Fleming T.H. (eds), Frugivores and Seed Dispersal.Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 199–210.Google Scholar
  15. Herrera C.M. 2000. Flower-to-seedling consequences of different pollination regimes in an insect-pollinated shrub. Ecology 81: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horwitz C.C. and Schemske D.W. 1986. Seed dispersal of a neotropical myrmecochore: variation in removal rates and dispersal distance. Biotropica 18: 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes L. and Westoby M. 1990. Removal rates of seeds adapted for dispersal by ants. Ecology 71: 138–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jules E.S. 1996. Yellow jackets (Vespula vulgaris) as a second seed disperser for the myrmecochorous plant, Trillium ovatum.American Midland Naturalist 135: 367–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalisz S., Hanzawa F.M., Tonsor S.J., Thiede D.A. and Voigt S. 1999. Ant mediated seed dispersal alters pattern of relatedness in a population of Trillium grandiflorum. Ecology 80: 2620– 2634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kawano S., Hiratsuka A. and Hayashi K. 1982. Life history characteristics and survivorship of Erythronium japonicum. Oikos 38: 129–149.Google Scholar
  21. Kjellsson G. 1985.Seed fate in a population of Carex pilulifera L.I. Seed dispersal and ant-seed mutualism. Oecologia 67: 416– 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Le Corff J.L. and Horvitz C.C. 1995. Dispersal of seeds from chasmogamous and cleistogamous flowers in an ant-dispersed neotropical herb. Oikos 73: 59–64.Google Scholar
  23. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W. and Wolfinger R.D. 1996.Journal of Ecology 75: 1091–1098.Google Scholar
  24. Ohkawara K., Higashi S. and Ohara M. 1996. Effects of ants, ground beetles and the seed-fall patterns on myrmecochory of Erythronium japonicum Decne. (Liliaceae). Oecologia 106: 500–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oostermeijer J.G.B. 1989. Myrmecochory in Polygala vulgaris L., Luzula campestris (L.) DC. and Viola curtissi Forster in a Dutch dune area. Oecologia 78: 302–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rice B. and Westoby M. 1986. Evidence against the hypothesis that ant-dispersed seeds reach nutrient-enriched microsites. Ecology 67: 1270–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richardson I.B.K. 1980. Erythronium L. In: Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M. and Webb D.A. (eds), Flora Europaea, 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  28. Ruhren S. and Dudash M.R. 1996. Consequences of the timing of seed release of Erythronium americanum (Liliaceae), a deciduous forest myrmecochore. American Journal of Botany 83: 633–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith B.H., Ronsheim M.L. and Swartz K.R. 1986. Reproductive ecology of Jeffersonia diphylla (Berberidaceae). American Journal of Botany 73: 1416–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith B.H., Forman P.D. and Boyd A. 1989a. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal and predation of two myrmecochorous forest herbs. Ecology 70: 1649–1656.Google Scholar
  31. Smith B.H., De Rivera C.E., Bridgman C.L. and Woida J.J. 1989b.Frequency-dependent seed dispersal by ants of two deciduous forest herbs. Ecology 70: 165–1648.Google Scholar
  32. Turnbull C.L. and Culver D.C. 1983. The timing of seed dispersal in Viola nuttalli: attraction of dispersers and avoidance of predators.Oecologia 59: 360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van der Pijl L. 1982. Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants. 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  34. Weiblen G.D. and Thomson J.D. 1995. Seed dispersal in Erythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Oecologia 102: 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zar J.D. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Guitián
    • 1
  • Mónica Medrano
    • 1
  • Javier Guitián
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Biología VegetalUniversidad de Santiago de Compostela, Facultad de FarmaciaSantiago de CompostelaSpain

Personalised recommendations