Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 537–544 | Cite as

Love at First Fright: Partner Salience Moderates Roller-Coaster-Induced Excitation Transfer

  • Cindy M. MestonEmail author
  • Penny F. Frohlich
Article

Abstract

This study examined the effects of residual nervous system arousal on perceptions of sexual attraction. Researchers approached individuals (males, n = 165; females, n = 135) at amusement parks as they were either waiting to begin or as they had just gotten off a roller-coaster ride. Participants were shown a photograph of an average attractive, opposite-gendered individual and asked to rate the individual on attractiveness and dating desirability. Participants were also asked to rate their seatmates' levels of attractiveness. Consistent with the predictions of excitation transfer theory, for males and females riding with a nonromantic partner, ratings of attractiveness and dating desirability toward the photographed individual were higher among persons exiting than entering the ride. Among persons riding with a romantic partner, there were no significant differences in attractiveness or dating desirability ratings between persons entering and exiting the ride. The findings are discussed in terms of the potential moderator effects of a salient romantic partner on excitation transfer.

excitation transfer sexual attraction gender residual arousal sexual arousal misattribution theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J. B., Kenrick, D. T., Linder, D. E., & McCall, M. A. (1989). Arousal, and attraction: A response-facilitation alternative to misattribution, and negative-reinforcement models. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 57, 261–270.Google Scholar
  2. Aron, A. (1970). Relationship variables in human heterosexual attraction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Barclay, A. M., & Haber, R. N. (1965). The relation of aggressive to sexual motivation. Journal of Personality, 33, 19–26.Google Scholar
  4. Buss, D., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 50, 559–570.Google Scholar
  5. Cantor, J. R., & Zillmann, D. (1973). The effects of affective state, and emotional arousal on music appreciation. Journal of General Psychology, 89, 79–108.Google Scholar
  6. Cantor, J. R., Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1975). Enhancement of experienced sexual arousal in response to erotic stimuli through misattribution of unrelated residual excitation. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 32, 69–75.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, B., Waugh, G., & Place, K. (1989). At the movies: An unobtrusive study of arousal-attraction. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 691–693.Google Scholar
  8. Dienstbier, R. A. (1979). Attraction increases, and decreases as a function of emotion-attribution, and appropriate social cues. Motivation, and Emotion, 3, 201–218.Google Scholar
  9. Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 23, 510–517.Google Scholar
  10. Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1989). Romantic attraction, and generalized liking for others who are sources of conflict-based arousal. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 21, 246–257.Google Scholar
  11. Foster, C. A., Witcher, B. S., Campbell, W. K., & Green, J. D. (1998). Arousal, and attraction: Evidence for automatic, and controlled processes. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 74, 86–101.Google Scholar
  12. Graziano, W. G., Jensen Campbell, L., Shebilske, L., & Lundgren, S. (1993). Social influence, sex differences, and judgments of beauty: Putting the “interpersonal” back in interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 522–531.Google Scholar
  13. Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror...; The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  14. Keller, M., & Young, R. (1996). Mate assortment in dating, and married couples. Personality, and Individual Differences, 21, 217–221.Google Scholar
  15. Meston, C. M. (2000). The psychophysiology of female sexual function. Journal of Sex Education, and Therapy, 25, 6–16.Google Scholar
  16. Meston, C. M., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1996). The effects of immediate, delayed, and residual sympathetic activation on sexual arousal in women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 143–148.Google Scholar
  17. Reisenzein, R., & Gattinger, E. (1982). Salience of arousal as a mediator of misattribution of transferred excitation. Motivation, and Emotion, 6, 315–328.Google Scholar
  18. White, G. L., Fishbein, S., & Rutstein, J. (1981). Passionate love, and the misattribution of arousal. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 41, 56–62.Google Scholar
  19. White, G. L., & Kight, T. D. (1984). Misattribution of arousal, and attraction: Effects of salience of explanations for arousal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 55–64.Google Scholar
  20. Wolpe, J. (1978). Comments on “A test of reciprocal inhibition” by Hoon, Wincze, and Hoon. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 452–454.Google Scholar
  21. Zillman, D. (1971). Excitation transfer in communication-mediated aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 419–434.Google Scholar
  22. Zillmann, D., Katcher, A. H., & Milavshky, B. (1972). Excitation transfer from physical exercise to subsequent aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 247–259.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustin

Personalised recommendations