Plant Ecology

, Volume 169, Issue 2, pp 259–271 | Cite as

Tree community structure and stem mortality along a water availability gradient in a Mexican tropical dry forest

  • Gerardo Segura
  • Patricia Balvanera
  • Elvira Durán
  • Alfredo Pérez


We document spatial changes in species diversity, composition, community structure, and mortality of trees across a gradient of water availability in a tropical dry forest in western Mexico. This gradient occurs along the main stream of a small watershed of less than 1 km in length. Four 30 × 80 m plots were established systematically to include the driest (ridge top of the watershed) to the wettest sites (watershed bottom) within this watershed. All stems larger than 5 cm were identified, and measured for diameter and height. Dead stems larger than 5 cm were measured and classified as: a) found on live or dead trees, and b) standing (“snags”) or lying (“downlogs”) on the ground. The number of recorded species per plot declined from 73 to 44 species as water availability decreased. A decline in estimated total richness, and in Shannon-Wiener and Simpson diversity indices was also observed in the drier plots. Species composition strongly changed along the gradient, with the two ends of the gradient sharing only 11% of the species. Stem density and percentage of dead stems and trees increased in abundance and basal area from the wetter to the drier sites. Tree and stem size (basal area, height and stem diameter) showed the opposite trend. Nonetheless, total basal area of live trees was largest at the two end gradient locations and oscillated between 12.22 m2 ha−1 and 7.93 m2 ha−1. Proportion of snags increased towards the driest site (from 46 to 72%), while that of down logs decreased. Overall, our results suggest that small-scale gradients of water availability play a paramount role in the spatial organization of tree communities in seasonal tropical environments.

Dominance/diversity Elevation gradient Moisture gradient Species diversity Stand structure Woody debris 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arriaga L. and León J.L. 1989. The mexican tropical deciduous forest of Baja-California-Sur: a floristic and structural approach. Vegetatio 8: 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arriaga L., Maya Y., Díaz S. and Cancino J. 1993. Association between cacti and nurse perennials in an heterogeneous tropical dry forest in northwestern Mexico. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 329–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balvanera P. 1999. Diversidad beta, heterogeneidad ambiental y relacionces espaciles en una selva baja caducifolia. PhD Dissertation, National Autonomous University of México.Google Scholar
  4. Balvanera P., Lott E., Segura G., Siebe C. and Islas A. 2002. Beta diversity patterns and correlates in a tropical dry forest of Mexico.J. Veg. Sci. 13: 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borchert R. 1994. Soil stem water storage determine phenology and distribution of troical dry forest trees. Ecology: 1437–1449.Google Scholar
  6. Brown J.H. 1988. Species diversity. In: Myers A. and Giller R.S. (eds), Analytical Biogeography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–89.Google Scholar
  7. Bullock S.H. 1986. Climate of Chamela, Jalisco, and trends in the south coastal region of Mexico. Arch. Meteorol. Geophys. Bioklimatol. Ser. B. 36: 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullock S.H. and Solis-Magallanes J.A. 1990. Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica 22: 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colwell R.K. 1994–2000. EstimateS, Scholar
  10. Condit R., Hubbell S.P. and Foster R.B. 1995. Mortality rates of 205 neotropical tree and strub species and the impact of a severe drought. Ecol. Monog. 65: 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cotler H., Durán E. and Siebe C. Caracterización morfoedafológica y calidad de sitio de un bosque tropical estacional. In: Ayala R., Quesada H. and Vega J (eds), Historia Natural de Chamela. Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (in presGoogle Scholar
  12. Coughenour M.B. and Ellis J.E. 1993. Landscape and climatic control of woody vegetation in a dry tropical ecosystem: Turkana District, Kenya. J. Biogeogr. 20: 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawley M.J. 1993. Glim for Ecologists. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Daws M.I., Mullins C.E., Burslem D.F.R.P., Paton S.R. and Dalling J.W. 2002. Topographic position affects the water regime in a semideciduous tropical forest in Panama. Plant and Soil 238: 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeWolf J. 1998. Species composition and structure of the woody vegetation of the Middle Casamance region (Senegal). For. Ecol. Manage. 111: 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galicia L., García-Oliva F. and López-Blanco J. 1995. Efecto de la estructura jerárquica del relieve en la distribución de las características físicas de los suelos en una cuenca tropical estacional mexicana. Efecto de la estructura jerárquica del relieve en la distribución de las características físicas de los suelos en una cuenca tropical estacional mexicana 3: 53–65.Google Scholar
  17. Galicia L., López-Blanco J., Zarco-Arista A.E., Filips V. and García-Oliva F. 1999. The relationship between solar radiation interception and soil water content in a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Catena 36.Google Scholar
  18. García-Oliva F., Ezcurra E. and Galicia L. 1991. Pattern of rainfall distribution in the Central Pacific Coast of Mexico. Geogr. Ann. A. 73: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. García-Oliva F., Maass J.M. and Galicia L. 1995. Rainstorm analysis and rainfall erosivity of a seasonal tropical region with a strong cyclonic influence on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. J. Appl. Meteorol. 34: 2491–2498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gentry A.H. 1995. Diversity and floristic composition of neotrpical dry forests. In: Bullock S.H., Hooney H.A. and Medina E. (eds), Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 243–276.Google Scholar
  21. Holdridge L. 1967. Life Zone Ecology. Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  22. López-Blanco J., Galicia L. and García-Oliva F. 1999. Hierarchical analysis of relief features in a small watershed in a tropical deciduous forest ecosystem in Mexico. Geogr. Fis. Dianm. Quat. 22: 33–40.Google Scholar
  23. Lott E.J. 1993. Annotated checklist of the vascular flora of the Chamela Bay Region, Jalisco, Mexico. Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 148: 1–148.Google Scholar
  24. Lott E.J., Bullock S.H. and Solis-Magallanes A. 1987. Floristic diversity and structure of Upland and Arroyo forests of coastal Jalisco. Floristic diversity and structure of Upland and Arroyo forests of coastal Jalisco.Google Scholar
  25. Maass J.M., Jaramillo V., Martínez-Yrízar A., García-Oliva F. and Sarukhán J. 1994. The Chamela Watershed Project: a study of the structure and functioning of a tropical deciduous forest in West Mexico. Centro de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  26. Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  27. Martijena N.E. and Bullock S.H. 1994. Monospecific dominance of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. J. Biogeogr. 21: 63– 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martínez-Yrízar A., Maass J.M., Pérez-Jiménez L.A. and Sarukhán J. 1996. Net primary productivity of a tropical deciduous forest ecosystem in western Mexico. J. Trop. Ecol. 12: 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mooney H.A., Bullock S.H. and Medina E. 1995. Introduction. In: Medina E. (ed.), Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  30. Murphy P.E. and Lugo A.E. 1995. Dry forest of Central America and the Caribbean. In: Medina E. (ed.), Sesonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 9–34.Google Scholar
  31. Murphy P.G. and Lugo A.E. 1986. Ecology of tropical dry forest. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olivares E. and Medina E. 1992. Water and nutrient relations of woody perennial from tropical dry forests. J. Veg. Sci. 3: 382– 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliveira-Filho A.T., Curi N., Vilela E.A. and Carvalho D.A. 1998. Effects of canopy gaps, topography, and soils on the distribution of woody species in a Central Brazilian deciduous dry forest. Biotropica 30: 362–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oliver C.D. and Larson B.C. 1996. Forest Stand Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,, Update Edition.Google Scholar
  35. Rosenzweig M.L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  36. SAS I.I. 1989–1996. JMP. SAS.Google Scholar
  37. Segura G. and Snook L.C. 1992. Stand dynamics and regeneration patterns of a pinyon pine forest in east central Mexico. For. Ecol. Manage. 47: 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SEMARNAP 1995. Reservas de la Biósfera y otras Areas Naturales Protegidas de México. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Secretaría del Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  39. Solis E. 1993. Características fisicoquímicas de un suelo en un ecosistema tropical estacional. BSc Thesis, National Autonomous University of Mexico.Google Scholar
  40. Sussman R.W. and Rakotozafy A. 1994. Plant diversity and structural analysis of a tropical dry forest in southwestern Madagascar.Biotropica 26: 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tokeshi M. 1993. Species abundance patterns and community structure. Species abundance patterns and community structure 24: 111–186.Google Scholar
  42. Trejo I. 1998. Distribución y diversidad de selvas bajas de México: relación con el clima y el suelo. PhD Thesis, National Autonomous University of Mexico.Google Scholar
  43. Villalba R. and Veblen T.T. 1998. Influences of large-scale climatic variability on episodic tree mortality in northern Patagonia. Ecology 79: 2624–2640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Waide R.B., Willig M.R., Steiner C.F., Mittelbach G., Gough L., Dodson S.I. et al. 1999. The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 257–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerardo Segura
    • 1
  • Patricia Balvanera
    • 2
  • Elvira Durán
    • 1
  • Alfredo Pérez
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología Funcional y Aplicada, Instituto de EcologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico
  2. 2.Departamento de Ecología de los Recursos Naturales, Instituto de EcologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMoreliaMexico
  3. 3.Instituto de BiologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico

Personalised recommendations