Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 509–517 | Cite as

Social Functioning Among Girls with Fragile X or Turner Syndrome and Their Sisters

  • Michèle M. M. Mazzocco
  • Thomas Baumgardner
  • Lisa S. Freund
  • Allan L. Reiss
Article

Abstract

Social behaviors among two genetically homogeneous groups—girls with fragile X (fraX) or Turner syndrome (TS)—were examined to address the role of family environment versus biological determinants of social dysfunction in girls with these disorders. Using a sibling pair design, girls with fraX or TS were compared with their own sisters on measures of IQ and social functioning. The 8 girls with fraX and the 9 girls with TS had lower FSIQ scores and higher ratings of social and attention problems relative to their own sisters. Girls with fraX also had higher ratings of withdrawn behaviors, relative to their own sisters. The unaffected sisters were not rated as demonstrating any difficulties in these areas, relative to controls. Correlations between problem ratings and FSIQ were not statistically significant. Although these preliminary findings do not indicate a lack of familial impact on social development in girls with either disorder, the results provide preliminary evidence that social dysfunction reported for girls with fraX or TS cannot be attributed solely, nor primarily, to global aspects of the family environment.

Fragile X Turner syndrome social development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, D., Ehrardt, A. A., & Money, J. (1966). Defective figure drawing, geometric and human, in Turner's syndrome. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders 142, 161–167.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, D., Duffelmay, F., & Geelan, M. (1988). Resource teacher perceptions of the prevalence of social dysfunction among students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 21, 380–381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bender, B. G., Linden, M. G., & Robinson, A. (1987). Environment and developmental risk in children with sex chromosome abnormalities. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 499–503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brainard, S. S., Schreiner, R. A., & Hagerman, R. J. (1991). Cognitive profiles of the carrier fragile X woman. American Journal of Medical Genetics 38, 505–508.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Denckla, M. (1983). The neuropsychology of social-emotional learning disabilities. Archives of Neurology, 40, 717–724.Google Scholar
  7. Dorn, M. B., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Hagerman, R. J. (1994). Behavioral and psychiatric disorders in adult male carriers of fragile X. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 33(2), 256–264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Downey, G., & Coyne, J. (1990). Children of depressed parents: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 50–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Forehand, R. (1993). Family psychopathology and child functioning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2(2), 79–85.Google Scholar
  10. Freund, L. S., & Reiss, A. L. (1991). Cognitive profiles associated with the fra(X) syndrome in males and females. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 38, 542–547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Freund, L. S., Reiss, A. L., & Abrams, M. T. (1993). Psychiatric disorders associated with fragile X in the young female. Pediatrics 91(2), 321–329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Freund, L. S., Reiss, A. L., Hagerman, R., & Vinogradov, S. (1992). Chromosome fragility and psychopathology in obligate female carriers of the fragile X chromosome. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 54–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagerman, R. J. (1996). Physical and behavioral phenotype. In R. J. Hagerman & A. C. Cronister (Eds.), Fragile X syndrome (2nd ed., pp. 3–87). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hagerman, R. J., & Sobesky, W. E. (1989). Psychopathology in fragile X syndrome. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 142–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kovar, C. G. (1993). The neurocognitive and psychosocial phenotype of fragile X syndrome in school age girls. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Denver.Google Scholar
  16. Lachiewicz, A. M. (1992). Abnormal behaviors of young girls with fragile X syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 43, 72–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lachiewicz, A. M., & Dawson, D. V. (1994). Behavior problems of young girls with fragile X syndrome: Factor scores on the Conners' Parent's Questionnaire. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 51, 364–369.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. LaHood, B. J., & Bacon, G. E. (1985). Cognitive abilities of adolescent Turner's syndrome patients. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 6, 358–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lobato, D., Barbour, L., Hall, L. J., & Miller, C. T. (1987). Psychosocial characteristics of preschool siblings of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 329–338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mazzocco, M. M., Pennington, B. F., & Hagerman, R. J. (1993). The neurocognitive phenotype of female carriers of fragile X: Additional evidence for specificity. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 14, 328–335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McCauley, E. (1990). Psychosocial and emotional aspects of Turner syndrome. In D. B. Berch & B. G. Bender (Eds.), Sex chromosome abnormalities and human behavior (pp. 78–99). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  22. McCauley, E., Ito, J., & Key, T. (1986). Psychosocial functioning in girls with Turner's syndrome and short stature: Social skills, behavior problems, and self-concept. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 25, 105–112.Google Scholar
  23. McCauley, E., Kay, T., Ito, J., & Treder, R. (1987). The Turner syndrome: Cognitive deficits, affective discrimination, and behavior problems. Child Development, 58, 464–473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Miezejeski, C. M., Jenkins, E. C., Hill, A. L., Wisniewski, K., French, J. H., & Brown, W. T. (1986). A profile of cognitive deficit in females from fragile X families. Neuropsychologia, 24, 405–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pennington, B. F., Heaton, R. K., Karzmar, P., Pendleton, M. G., Lehman, R., & Schucard, D. W. (1985). The neuropsychological phenotype in Turner syndrome. Cortex, 21, 391–404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Plomin, R. (1995). Genetics and children's experiences in the family. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 33–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Reich, W., & Welner, Z. (1988). DICA-R-P DSM-III-R Version. Seattle: University of Washington University.Google Scholar
  28. Reiss, A. L., Freund, L., Abrams, M. T., Boehm, C., & Kazazian, H. (1993). Neurobehavioral effects of the fragile X premutation in adult women: A controlled study. American Journal of Human Genetics, 52, 884–894.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rourke, B. (1989). Nonverbal Learning Disabilities: The Syndrome and the Model. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rousseau, F., Heitz, D., Tarleton, J., MacPherson, J., Malmgren, H., Dahl, N., Barnicoat, A., Mathew, C., Mornet, E., Tejada, I., Maddalena, A., Spiegel, R., Schinzel, A., Marcos, J. A. G., Schwartz, C., & Mandel, J. L. (1994). A multicenter study on genotype-phenotype correlations in the fragile X syndrome, using direct diagnosis with probe StB 12.3: The first 2,253 cases. American Journal of Human Genetics, 55, 225–237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rovet, J. F. (1993). The psychoeducational characteristics of children with Turner syndrome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 333–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sonis, W. A., Levine Ross, J., Blue, J., Cutler, G. B., Loriaux, P. L., & Klein, R. P. (1983,). Hyperactivity and Turner's syndrome. Paper presented at the American Academy of Child Psychiatry Meetings, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  33. Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, H. V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Interview Edition Survey Form Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  34. Verkerk, A. J., Pieretti, M., Sutcliffe, J. S., Fu, Y. H., Kuhl, D. P., Pizzuti, A., Reiner, O., Richards, S., Victoria, M. F., Fuping Zhang, M. F. V., Eussen, B. E., van Ommen, G. J. B., Blonden, L. A. J., Riggins, G. J., Chastain, J. L., Kunst, C. B., Galjaard, H., Caskey, C. T., Nelson, D. L., Oostra, B. A., & Warren, S. T. (1991). Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell, 65, 905–914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Voeller, K. K. S. (1991). Social-emotional learning disabilities. Psychiatric Annals, 21, 735–741.Google Scholar
  36. Weschler, D. (1974). WISC-R Manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. New York: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michèle M. M. Mazzocco
    • 1
  • Thomas Baumgardner
    • 1
  • Lisa S. Freund
    • 1
  • Allan L. Reiss
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioral Neurogenetics Research CenterKennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimore

Personalised recommendations