Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 241–251

Innate and enhanced predator recognition in hatchery-reared chinook salmon

  • Barry A. Berejikian
  • E. P. Tezak
  • Anita L. LaRae


We used a laboratory behaviour assay to investigate how innate predator recognition, handling stress, retention time, and number of conditioning events might affect chemically mediated anti-predator conditioning for hatchery-reared chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Juvenile chinook salmon with no prior exposure to predatory stimuli exhibited innate fright responses to northern pikeminnow, Ptychocheilis oregonensis, odour, regardless of whether the salmon came from a population that exists in sympatry or allopatry with northern pikeminnows. Juvenile chinook salmon exhibited enhanced predator recognition following a single conditioning event with conspecific extract and northern pikeminnow odour. Handling similar to what hatchery salmon might experience prior to release did not substantially reduce the conditioned response. When we conditioned juvenile chinook salmon in hatchery rearing vessels, fish from tanks treated once exhibited a conditioned response to northern pikeminnow odour in aquaria, but only for one behaviour (feeding response), and fish treated twice did not respond. The results suggest that enhanced recognition of predator stimuli occurs quickly, but may be to some extent context-specific, which may limit conditioned fright responses after release into the natural environment.

Oncorhynchus tshawytscha anti-predator conditioning fright response 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berejikian, B.A. 1995. The effects of hatchery and wild ancestry and experience on the relative ability of steelhead trout fry (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to avoid a benthic predator. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 2076–2082.Google Scholar
  2. Berejikian, B.A., R.J.F. Smith, E.P. Tezak, S.L. Schroder & C.M. Knudsen. 1999. Chemical alarm signals and complex hatchery rearing habitats affect anti-predator behaviour and survival of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) juveniles. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 830–838.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, G.E., D.P. Chivers & R.J.F. Smith. 1997. Differential learning rates of chemical versus visual cues of a northern pike by fathead minnows in a natural habitat. Environ. Biol. Fish. 49: 89–96.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, G.E. & R.J.F. Smith. 1997. Conspecific skin extracts elicit antipredator responses in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can. J. Zool. 75: 1916–1922.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, G.E. & R.J.F. Smith. 1998. Acquired predator recognition in juvenile rainbowtrout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Conditioning hatchery reared fish to recognize chemical cues of a predator. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 611–617.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, G.E., D.P. Chivers & R.J.F. Smith. 1995. Fathead minnows avoid conspecific and heterospecific alarm pheromones in the faeces of northern pike. J. Fish Biol. 47: 387–393.Google Scholar
  7. Chivers, D.P. & R.J.F. Smith. 1994a. The role of experience and chemical alarm signaling in predator recognition by fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas. J. Fish Biol. 44: 273–285.Google Scholar
  8. Chivers, D.P. & R.J.F. Smith. 1994b. Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) acquire predator recognition when alarm substance is associated with the sight of unfamiliar fish. Anim. Behav. 48: 597–605.Google Scholar
  9. Chivers, D.P., G.E. Brown & R.J.F. Smith. 1995. Acquired recognition of chemical stimuli from pike, Esox lucius, by brook sticklebacks, Culaea inconstans, (Osteichthyes, Gasterosteidae). Ethology 99: 234–242.Google Scholar
  10. Chivers, D.P. & R.J.F. Smith. 1995. Chemical recognition of risky habitats is culturally transmitted among fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas (Osteichthyes, Cyprinidae). Ethology 99: 286–296.Google Scholar
  11. Collis, K., R.E. Beaty & B.R. Crain. 1995. Changes in catch rate and diet of northern squawfish associated with the release of hatchery-reared juvenile salmonids in a Columbia River reservoir. North. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 15: 346–357.Google Scholar
  12. Gotceitas, V. & J.-G.J. Godin. 1993. Effects of aerial and in-stream threat of predation on foraging by juvenile Atlantic salmon (salmo salar). pp. 35–41. In: R.J. Gibson & R.E. Cutting (ed.) Production of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon, Salmo salar, in Natural Waters, Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 118.Google Scholar
  13. Healey, MC. & U. Reinhardt. 1995. Predator avoidance in na¨ïve and experienced juvenile chinook and coho salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 614–622.Google Scholar
  14. Huntingford, F.A. & R.M. Coulter. 1989. Habituation of predator inspection in three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. J. Fish Biol. 35: 153–154.Google Scholar
  15. Johnsson, J.I., J. Hojesjo & I.A. Fleming. 2001. Behavioural and heart rate responses to predation risk in wild and domesticated Atlantic salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 788–794.Google Scholar
  16. Kanayama, Y. 1968. Studies of the conditioned reflex in lower vertebrates. X. Defensive conditioned reflex of chum salmon fry in a group. Marine. Biol. 2: 77–87.Google Scholar
  17. Lebedeva, N.Y., M.A.Y Vosilene & R.V. Golovkina. 1994. Aspects of stress in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, release of chemical alarm signals. J. Ichthyol. 33: 66–74.Google Scholar
  18. Magurran, A.E. 1989. Acquired recognition of predator odour in the European minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus). Ethology 82: 216–223.Google Scholar
  19. Magurran, A.E. & S.L. Girling. 1986. Predator model recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows. Anim. Behav. 34: 510–518.Google Scholar
  20. Mathis, A. & R.J.F. Smith. 1993a. Chemical labeling of northern pike (Esox lucius) by the alarm pheromone of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 1967–1979.Google Scholar
  21. Mathis, A., & R.J.F. Smith. 1993b. Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, learn to recognize northern pike, Esox lucius, as predators on the basis of chemical stimuli from minnows in the pike's diet. Anim. Behav. 46: 645–656.Google Scholar
  22. Maynard, D.J., A.L. LaRae, G.C. McDowell, G.A. Snell, T.A. Flagg & C.V.W. Mahnken. 1998. Predator avoidance training can increase post-release survival of chinook salmon. pp. 59–62. In: R.Z. Smith (ed.), Proceedings of the 48th Annual Pacific Northwest Fish Culture Conference, Gleneden Beach, OR.Google Scholar
  23. Mesa, M.G. 1994. Effects of multiple acute stressors on the predator avoidance ability and physiology of juvenile chinook salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 123: 786–793.Google Scholar
  24. Mesa, M.G., T.P. Poe, D.M. Gadomski & J.H. Petersen. 1994. Are all prey created equal? A review and synthesis of differential predation on prey in substandard condition. J. Fish. Biol. 45 (Suppl. A): 81–96.Google Scholar
  25. Metcalfe, N.B., F.A. Huntingford & J.E. Thorpe. 1987. The influence of predation risk on the feeding motivation and foraging strategy of juvenile Atlantic salmon. Anim. Behav. 35: 901–911.Google Scholar
  26. Mirza, R.S. & D.P. Chivers. 2000. Predator-recognition training enhances survival of brook trout: evidence from laboratory and field-enclosure studies. Can. J. Zool. 78: 2198–2208.Google Scholar
  27. Olla, B.L. & M.W. Davis. 1989. The role of learning and stress in predator avoidance of hatchery-reared coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) juveniles. Aquaculture 76: 209–214.Google Scholar
  28. Patten, B.G. 1977. Body size and learned avoidance as factors affecting predation on coho salmon fry by torrent sculpin (Cottus rotheus). Fish. Bull. 75: 451–459.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, R.J.F. 1992. Alarm signals in fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2: 33–63.Google Scholar
  30. Suboski, M.D. 1988. Acquisition and social communication of stimulus recognition by fish. Behav. Process. 16: 213–244.Google Scholar
  31. Thompson, R.B. 1966. Effects of predator avoidance conditioning on the postrelease survival rate of artificially propagated salmon, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  32. Welch, C. & P. Colgan. 1990. The effects of contrast and position on habituation to models of predators in eastern banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanous). Behav. Process. 22: 61–71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry A. Berejikian
    • 1
  • E. P. Tezak
    • 2
  • Anita L. LaRae
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S.A. (e-mail
  2. 2.U.S.A
  3. 3.U.S.A

Personalised recommendations