Reliable Computing

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 465–485 | Cite as

Convex Imprecise Previsions

  • Renato Pelessoni
  • Paolo Vicig
Article

Abstract

In this paper centered convex previsions are introduced as a special class of imprecise previsions, showing that they retain or generalise most of the relevant properties of coherent imprecise previsions but are not necessarily positively homogeneous. The broader class of convex imprecise previsions is also studied and its fundamental properties are demonstrated, introducing in particular a notion of convex natural extension which parallels that of natural extension but has a larger domain of applicability. These concepts appear to have potentially many applications. In this paper they are applied to risk measurement, leading to a general definition of convex risk measure which corresponds, when its domain is a linear space, to the one recently introduced in risk measurement literature.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Artzner, P.: Application of Coherent Risk Measures to Capital Requirements in Insurance, North American Actuarial Journal 3 (1999), pp. 11–26.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, S., and Heath, D.: Coherent Measures of Risk, Mathematical Finance 9 (1999), pp. 203–228.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delbaen, F.: Coherent Risk Measures on General Probability Spaces, in: Sandmann, K. and Sch¨onbucher, P. J. (eds), Advances in Finance and Stochastics, Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Finetti, B.: Theory of Probability, volume 1, Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Föllmer, H. and Schied, A.: Convex Measures of Risk and Trading Constraints, Finance and Stochastics 6 (2002), pp. 429–447.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Föllmer, H. and Schied, A.: Robust Preferences and Convex Measures of Risk, in: Sandmann, K. and Sch¨onbucher, P. J. (eds), Advances in Finance and Stochastics, Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 39–56.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D.: Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior, Journal of Mathematical Economics 18 (1989), pp. 141–153.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaschke, S. and K¨uchler, U.: Coherent Risk Measures and Good-Deal Bounds, Finance and Stochastics 5 (2001), pp. 181–200.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maaß, S.: Exact Functionals and Their Core, Statistical Papers 43 (2002), pp. 75–93.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pelessoni, R. and Vicig, P.: Coherent Risk Measures and Imprecise Previsions, in: Proc. ISIPTA'01, Ithaca, NY, 2001, pp. 307–315.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pelessoni, R. and Vicig, P.: Imprecise Previsions for Risk Measurement, Int. Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness, and Knowledge-Based Systems, to appear.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Staum, J.: Pricing and Hedging in Incomplete Markets: Fundamental Theorems and Robust Utility Maximization, Tech. Rep. 1351, Dept. of ORIE, Cornell University, 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Troffaes, M. C. M. and de Cooman, G.: Lower Previsions for Unbounded Random Variables, in: Grzegorzewski, P., Hryniewicz, O., and Gil, M. ´ A. (eds), Soft Methods in Probability, Statistics and Data Analysis, Advances in Soft Computing, Physica-Verlag, New York, 2002, pp. 146–155.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walley, P.:Measures of Uncertainty in Expert Systems, Artificial Intelligence 83 (1996), pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walley, P.: Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities, Chapman and Hall, 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renato Pelessoni
    • 1
  • Paolo Vicig
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata “B. de Finetti”University of TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations