Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification Accuracy of Children versus Adults: A Meta-Analysis

  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Identification accuracy of children and adults was examined in a meta-analysis. Preschoolers (M = 4 years) were less likely than adults to make correct identifications. Children over the age of 5 did not differ significantly from adults with regard to correct identification rate. Children of all ages examined were less likely than adults to correctly reject a target-absent lineup. Even adolescents (M = 12–13 years) did not reach an adult rate of correct rejection. Compared to simultaneous lineup presentation, sequential lineups increased the child–adult gap for correct rejections. Providing child witnesses with identification practice or training did not increase their correct rejection rates. Suggestions for children's inability to correctly reject target-absent lineups are discussed. Future directions for identification research are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, R. L., & Winograd, E. (1978). Developmental differences in children's recognition memory for faces. Developmental Psychology, 14, 441–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., & Karlin, M. B. (1974). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K., & Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195, 312–314.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition—A maturational component. Developmental Psychology, 16, 257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., Toglia, M. P., & Ross, D. F. (1987). Children's eyewitness memory. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1979). Reliability of face recognition performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 115–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1984). Face-recognition memory: Implications for children's eyewitness testimony. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance, J. E., Turner, A. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1982). Development of differential recognition of own-and other-race faces. Journal of Psychology, 112, 29–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. M. (1993). Children's memory for other people: An integrative review. In C. Nelson (Ed.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 26, Memory and affect in development (pp. 123–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. M. (1996). Children's identification evidence. In S. L. Sporer, R. Malpass, & G. Kohnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 233–258). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. M., Stevenson-Robb, Y., & Flin, R. (1988). Tales out of school: Children's memory for a simulated health inspection. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 1, Memory in everyday life (pp. 122–127). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekle, D. J., Beal, C. R., Elliott, R., & Huneycutt, D. (1996). Children as witnesses: A comparison of lineup versus show up identification methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J., & Bruce, A. (1973). The effects of age and sex upon adolescents' recognition of faces. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123, 173–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, S., & Entwistle, D. R. (1976). Children's ability to recognize other children's faces. Child Development, 47, 506–510.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R. H., (1980). Age effects in children's memory for unfamiliar faces. Developmental Psychology, 16, 373–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. G. (1977). The fallibility of the eyewitness: Psychological evidence. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Psychology in the legal process. New York: Spectrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Hirschman, J. E., Hepps, D., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children's memory for stressful events. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 37, 109–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G., & Reed, R. (1986). Age differences in eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leippe, M. R., Romanczyk, A., & Manion, A. P. (1991). Eyewitness memory for a touching experience: Accuracy differences between child and adult witnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 367–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. C. L., Craig, W., Lee, K., Pozzulo, J. D., Rombough, V., & Smyth, L. (1995, July). Eyewitness identification procedures for use with children. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Vancouver, British Columbia.

  • Lindsay, R. C. L., & Harvie, V. (1988). Hits, false alarms, correct and mistaken identifications: The effects of method of data collection on facial memory. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol 1, Memory in everyday life (pp. 47–52). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., & Fulferd, J. A. (1991). Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 741–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., Nosworthy, G. J., Fulford, J. A., Hector, J., LeVan, V., & Seabrook, C. (1991). Biased lineups: Sequential presentation reduces the problem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 796–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. C. L., Pozzulo, J. D., Craig, W., Lee, K., & Corber, S. (1997). Simultaneous lineups, sequential lineups, and showups: Eyewitness identification decisions of adults and children. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. C. L., Wallbridge, H., & Drennan, D. (1987). Do the clothes make the man? An exploration of the effect of lineup attire on eyewitness identification accuracy. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 19, 464–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1980). Realism and eyewitness identification research. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 347–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, B. V., Holmes, D. L., Guth, M., & Kovac, P. (1979). The potential of children as eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. H., Carlomusto, M., & Goldstein, A. G. (1978). Orienting task and study time in facial recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 313–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. M., & Wells, G. L. (1982). Does knowledge that a crime was staged affect eyewitness performance? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. E., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1976). Recognition of previously labelled and unlabelled pictures by 5-year-olds and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13, 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. F., & Carranza, L. E. (1989). Eyewitness testimony of children in target-present and target-absent lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. F., Haverfield, E., & Baker-Thomas, S. (1986). Eyewitness testimony of children. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. F., & Ryan, V. (1993). An attempt to reduce guessing behavior in children's and adults' eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzulo, J. D., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1997). Descriptions of children versus adults. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Pozzulo, J. D., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (in press). Increasing correct identifications by children. Expert Evidence.

  • Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strnad, B. N., & Mueller, J. H. (1977). Levels of processing in face recognition memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W. A., & Veefkind, N. (1992). Comparisons of one-person and many-person lineups: A warning against unsafe practices. In F. Losel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 275–285). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L. (1984). The psychology of lineup identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., & Hryciw, B. (1984). Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory and Cognition, 12, 338–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., & Luus, C. A. E. (1990). Police lineups as experiments: Social methodology as a framework for properly-conducted lineups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, G. M. (1912). Psychology of testimony and report. Psychological Bulletin, 9, 264–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, E. (1976). Recognition memory for faces following nine different judgments. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 419–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarmey, A. D. (1988). Streetproofing and bystander's memory for a child abduction. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol 1, Memory in everyday life (pp. 112–116). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarmey, A. D., Yarmey, M. J., & Yarmey, A. L. (1994). Face and voice identifications in showup and lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 453–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarmey, A. D., Yarmey, M. J., & Yarmey, A. L. (1997). Face and voice identifications in showup and lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 477–459.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Joanna D. Pozzulo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. C. L. Lindsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Pozzulo, J.D., Lindsay, R.C.L. Identification Accuracy of Children versus Adults: A Meta-Analysis. Law Hum Behav 22, 549–570 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025739514042

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025739514042

Keywords

Search

Navigation