Behavior Genetics

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 125–132 | Cite as

A Simple Method to Calculate Resolving Power and Confidence Interval of QTL Map Location

Article

Abstract

“Resolving power” is defined as the 95% confidence interval for quantitative trait locus (QTL) map location that would be obtained when scoring an infinite number of markers in a given constellation of a marker-QTL mapping experiment. Resolving power can serve as a close estimate of the confidence interval of QTL map location, as well as a guide to the lower efficient limit of marker spacing in an initial marker-QTL mapping experiment. In the present study, an extensive series of simulations was carried out to provide estimates of resolving power, for backcross (BC) and F2 designs, over a wide range of experimental sizes and of gene effects and dominance at the QTL. From the simulation results, the remarkably simple expressions, 3000/(mNd2) (where m = 1 for BC and m = 2 for F2; N = population size, and d = allele substitution effect) and 530/Nν (in terms of ν, the proportion of variance explained), were obtained for estimating resolving power. These expressions can provide a convenient guide to planning marker spacing in BC and F2 marker-QTL linkage experiments and for placing confidence intervals about QTL map location obtained in such experiments.

Quantitative trait loci (QTL) confidence interval resolving power gene mapping 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Darvasi, A., Weinreb, A., Minke, V., Weller, J. I., and Soller, M. (1993). Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics 134:943–951.Google Scholar
  2. Falconer, D. S. (1989). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd ed., Longman, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Hoeschele, I., and Van Raden, P. M. (1993). Bayesian analysis of linkage between genetic markers and quantitative trait loci. 1. Prior knowledge. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85:953–960.Google Scholar
  4. Lander, E. S., and Botstein, D. (1989). Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199.Google Scholar
  5. Mangin, B., Goffinet, B., and Rebai, A. (1994). Constructing confidence intervals for QTL location. Genetics 138:1301–1308.Google Scholar
  6. Rebai, A., Goffinet, B., and Mangin, B. (1994). Approximate thresholds of interval mapping tests for QTL detection. Genetics 138:235–240.Google Scholar
  7. Thoday, J. M. (1961). Location of polygenes. Nature 191:368–370.Google Scholar
  8. Van Ooijen, J. W. (1992). Accuracy of mapping quantitative trait loci in autogamous species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:803–811.Google Scholar
  9. Visscher, P. M., Thompson, R., and Haley, C. S. (1996). Confidence intervals in QTL mapping by bootstrapping. Genetics 143:1013–1020.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Genetics, The Alexander Silberman Life Sciences InstituteThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations