Sex Roles

, Volume 36, Issue 11–12, pp 771–792 | Cite as

Response Style Theory Revisited: Gender Differences and Stereotypes in Rumination and Distraction

  • Jaine Strauss
  • Theresa Muday
  • Karlyn McNall
  • Mitchell Wong


Response Style Theory [S. Nolen-Hoeksema (1987) “Sex Differences in Unipolar Depression: Evidence and Theory,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 101, pp. 259–282] suggests that, when depressed, women ruminate on their sad feelings while men distract themselves from theirs. We sought to examine this gender difference in more detail. In Study 1, 155 students provided stereotype ratings or self-reports of responses to depression. The stereotype ratings conformed precisely to Response Style Theory yet exaggerated self-reported gender differences, especially for men. In Study 2, 40 roommate pairs completed a similar set of ratings. Again, other-ratings conformed exactly to Response Style Theory's predictions while self-ratings showed a more moderated pattern. In both studies, women reported ruminating more than did men, yet men and women were equally likely to report distraction. We conclude by examining several hypotheses for the discrepancies between stereotypes and self-reports for men as well as the increased rates of rumination among women.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Broverman, I., Broverman, D., Clarkson, F., Rosenkrantz, P., & Vogel, S. (1970). Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 1–7.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, L. D., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender differences in responses to depressed mood in a college sample. Sex Roles, 30, 331–346.Google Scholar
  3. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Conway, M., Giannopoulos, C., & Stiefenhofer, K. (1990). Response styles to sadness are related to sex and sex-role orientation. Sex Roles, 22, 579–597.Google Scholar
  6. Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and wellbeing: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427–434.Google Scholar
  7. Grossman, M., & Wood, W. (1993). Sex differences in intensity of emotional experience: a social role interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1010–1022.Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton, J. A., Alagna, S. W., King, L. S., & Lloyd, C. (1987). The emotional consequences of gender-based abuse in the workplace: New counseling programs for sex discrimination. Women and Therapy, 6, 155–182.Google Scholar
  9. Hammen, C. L., & Padesky, C. A. (1977). Sex differences in the expression of depressive responses on the Beck Depression Inventory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 609–614.Google Scholar
  10. Hammen, C. L., & Peters, S. D. (1977). Differential responses to male and female depressive reactions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 994–1001.Google Scholar
  11. Howard, G. (1991). Culture tales: A narrative approach to thinking, cross-cultural psychology, and psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 46, 187–197.Google Scholar
  12. Ingram, R. E. (1984). Toward an information-processing analysis of depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8, 443–478.Google Scholar
  13. Ingram, R. E., Cruet, D., Johnson, B. R., & Wisnicki, K. S. (1988). Self-focused attention, gender, gender role, and vulnerability to negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 967–978.Google Scholar
  14. Kaplan, A. (1986). The “self-in-relation”: Implications for depression in women. Psychotherapy, 23, 234–242.Google Scholar
  15. Kaplan, M. (1983). A woman's view of DSM-III. American Psychologist, 38, 786–792.Google Scholar
  16. Kupers, T. (1993). Revisioning men's lives: gender, intimacy, and power. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Levant, R. (1996). The new psychology of men. Professional Psychology, 27, 259–265.Google Scholar
  18. Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1993). Self-perpetuating properties of dysphoric rumination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 339–349.Google Scholar
  19. Morrow, J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1990). The effects of responses to depression on remediation of depressive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 519–527.Google Scholar
  20. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1987). Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 259–282.Google Scholar
  21. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1990). Sex differences in depression. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Morrow, J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1993). Response styles and the duration of episodes of depressed mood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 20–28.Google Scholar
  23. Phillips, R. D., & Gilroy, F. D. (1985). Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health: The Brovermans' findings reexamined. Sex Roles, 12, 179–193.Google Scholar
  24. Rubinow, D. R., & Roy-Byrne, P. (1984). Premenstrual syndromes: Overview from a methodologic perspective. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 163–172.Google Scholar
  25. Seidler, V. J. (1989). Rediscovering masculinity: reason, language, and sexuality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Weissman, M. M., & Klerman, G. L. (1977). Sex differences in the epidemiology of depression. Archives of General Psychology, 25, 1304–1311.Google Scholar
  27. Widiger, T. A., & Settle, S. A. (1987). Broverman et al. revisited: An artifactual gender bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 463–469.Google Scholar
  28. Wood, J., Saltzberg, J., Neale, J. M., Stone, A. A., & Rachmiel, T. B. (1990). Self-focused attention, coping responses, and distressed mood in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1027–1036.Google Scholar
  29. Wood, W., Rhodes, N., & Whelan, M. (1989). Sex differences in positive well-being: A consideration of emotional style and marital status. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 249–264.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaine Strauss
    • 1
  • Theresa Muday
    • 2
  • Karlyn McNall
    • 2
  • Mitchell Wong
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMacalester CollegeSt. Paul
  2. 2.Williams CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations