Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 1981–1995 | Cite as

Drought Stress Alters the Concentration of Wood Terpenoids in Scots Pine and Norway Spruce Seedlings

  • Satu TurtolaEmail author
  • Anne-Marja Manninen
  • Risto Rikala
  • Pirjo Kainulainen
Article

Abstract

Drought is known to have an impact on the resistance of conifers to various pests, for example, by affecting resin flow in trees. Little is known, however, about the quantitative and qualitative changes in resin when trees are growing in low moisture conditions. We exposed Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings to medium and severe drought stress for two growing seasons and analyzed the monoterpenes and resin acids in the main stem wood after two years of treatment. In addition to secondary chemistry, we measured the level of nutrients in the needles and the growth response of seedlings. After the first year of treatment, drought stress did not affect the growth of seedlings, but in the second year, shoot growth was retarded, especially in Scots pine. In both conifer species, severe drought increased the concentrations of several individual monoterpenes and resin acids. Total monoterpenes and resin acids were 39 and 32% higher in severe drought-treated Scots pine seedlings than in the controls, and 35 and 45% higher in Norway spruce seedlings. In Scots pine needles, the concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus increased, while magnesium and calcium decreased compared to controls. In Norway spruce needles, nutrient concentrations were not affected. The results suggest that drought stress substantially affects both the growth of conifers and the chemical quality of the wood. We discuss the potential trade-off in growth and defense of small conifer seedlings.

Drought stress monoterpenes resin acids wood seedlings Pinus sylvestris L. Picea abies (L.) Karst conifers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, S. E. 1989. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, p. 368.Google Scholar
  2. Björkman, C. 2000. Interactive effects of host resistance and drought stress on the performance of gall-making aphid living on Norway spruce. Oecologia 123:223–231.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, J. P., Chapin, F. S., III, and Klein, D. R. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368.Google Scholar
  4. Christiansen, E. 1992. After-effects of drought did not predispose young Picea abies to infection by the bark beetle-transmitted blue-stain fungus Ophiostoma polonicum. Scand. J. For. Res. 7:557–569.Google Scholar
  5. Christiansen, E., Waring, R. H., and Berryman, A. A. 1987. Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: Searching for general relationships. For. Ecol. Manage. 22:89–106.Google Scholar
  6. Cobb, N. S., Mopper, S., Gehring, C. A., Caouette, M., Christensen, K. M., and Whitham, T. G. 1997. Increased moth herbivory associated with environmental stress of pinyon pine at local and regional levels. Oecologia 109:389–397.Google Scholar
  7. Coley, P. D., Bryant, J. P., and Chapin, F. S., III. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899.Google Scholar
  8. Croise, L. and Lieutier, F. 1993. Effects of drought on the induced defence reaction of Scots pine to bark beetle-associated fungi. Ann. Sci. For. 50:91–97.Google Scholar
  9. Croteau, R. and Johnson, M. A. 1985. Biosynthesis of terpenoid wood extractives, pp. 379–439, in T. Higuchi (ed.). Biosynthesis and Biodegradation of Wood Components. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  10. Eberhardt, T. L., Han, J. S., Micales, J. A., and Young, R. A. 1994. Decay resistance in conifer seed cones: Role of resin acids as inhibitors of decomposition by white-rot fungi. Holzforschung 48:278–284.Google Scholar
  11. Gilmore, A. R. 1977. Effects of soil moisture stress on monoterpenes in loblolly pine. J. Chem. Ecol. 3:667–676.Google Scholar
  12. Gref, R. and Ericsson, A. 1985. Wound-induced changes of resin acid concentrations in living bark of Scots pine seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 15:92–96.Google Scholar
  13. Harju, A. M., Kainulainen, P., Venäläinen, M., Tiitta, M., and Viitanen, H. 2002. Differences in resin acid concentration between brown-rot resistant and susceptible Scots pine heartwood. Holzforschung 56:479–486.Google Scholar
  14. Herms, D. A. and Mattson, W. J. 1992. The dilemma of plants: To grow or defend. Q. Rev. Biol. 67:283–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodges, J. D. and Lorio, P. L., Jr. 1975. Moisture stress and composition of xylem oleoresin in loblolly pine. For. Sci. 21:283–290.Google Scholar
  16. John, K. M. 1970. Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in soil and plant materials with ascorbic acid. Soil. Sci. 109:214–220.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, R. H., Young, B. L., and Alstad, D. N. 1997. Responses of ponderosa pine growth and volatile terpene concentrations to manipulation of soil, water, and sunlight availability. Can. J. For. Res. 27:1794–1804.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, C. G. and Coleman, J. S. 1991. Plant stress and insect herbivory, toward an integrated perspective, pp. 249–280, in H. A. Mooney, W. E. Winner, E. J. Pell, and E. Chu (Eds.). Response of Plants to Multiple Tresses. Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  19. Kainulainen, P., Oksanen, J., Palomäki, V., Holopainen, J. K., and Holopainen, T. 1992. Effect of drought and waterlogging stress on needle monoterpenes of Picea abies. Can. J. Bot. 70:1613–1616.Google Scholar
  20. Kuusisto, E., Kauppi, L., and Heikinheimo, P. (Eds.). 1996. Climate change and Finland, p. 16, in Summary of the Finnish Research Programme on Climate Change (SILMU). Helsinki University Press, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  21. Larsson, S. and Björkman, C. 1993. Performance of chewing and phloem-feeding insects on stressed trees. Scand. J. For. Res. 8:550–559.Google Scholar
  22. Lindberg, M. and Johansson, M. 1992. Resistance of Picea abies seedlings to infection by Heterobasidion annosum in relation to drought stress. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 22:115–124.Google Scholar
  23. Llusia, J. and Penuelas, J. 1998. Changes in terpene content and emission in potted Mediterranean woody plants under severe drought. Can. J. Bot. 76:1366–1373.Google Scholar
  24. Lombardero, M. J., Ayres, M. P., Lorio, P. L., and Ruel, J. J. 2000. Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible resin defences of Pinus taeda. Ecol. Lett. 3:329–339.Google Scholar
  25. Major, E. J. 1990. Water stress in Sitka spruce and its effect on the green spruce aphid Elatobium abietinum, pp. 85–93, in A. D. Watt, S. R. Leather, M. D. Hunter, and N. A. C. Kidd (Eds.). Population Dynamics of Forest Insects. Intercept, Andover, Hampshire.Google Scholar
  26. Manninen, A.-M., Tarhanen, S., Vuorinen, M., and Kainulainen, P. 2002. Comparing the variation of needle and wood terpenoids in Scots pine provenances. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:211–228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mattson, W. J. and Haack, R. A. 1987. The role of drought stress in provoking outbreaks of phytophagous insects, pp. 365–407, in P. Barbosa and J. C. Schultz. (Eds.). Insect Outbreaks. Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  28. Micales, J. A., Han, J. S., Davis, J. L., and Young, R. A. 1994. Chemical composition and fungitoxic activities of Pine cone extractives, pp. 317–332, in G. C. Llewellyn, W. V. Dashek, and C. E. O'Rear (Eds.). Biodeterioration Research 4. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Phillips, M. A. and Croteau, R. B. 1999. Resin-based defences in conifers. Trends Plant Sci. 4/5:184–190.Google Scholar
  30. Schulze, E. D. 1991. Water and nutrient interactions with plant water stress, pp. 89–101, in H. A. Mooney, W. E. Winner, E. J. Pell, and E. Chu (Eds.). Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses. Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  31. Temnerud, E. 1999. The occurence of resin pockets in sawlog populations of Picea abies [L.] Karst. from five geographic regions in Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 14:143–155.Google Scholar
  32. Teskey, R. O., Bongarten, B. C., Cregg, B. M., Dougherty, P. M., and Hennessey, T. C. 1987. Physiology and genetics of tree growth response to moisture and temperature stress: An examination of the characteristics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiol. 3:41–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Virkkala, R. and Toivonen, H. 1999. Maintaining biological diversity in Finnish forests, p. 56, in The Finnish Environment 278. Edita Helsinki.Google Scholar
  34. Wagner, M. R. 1986. Influence of moisture stress and induced resistance in ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa dougl. ex. laws, on the pine sawfly, Neodiprion autumnalis smith. For. Ecol. Manage. 15:43–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satu Turtola
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Anne-Marja Manninen
    • 1
  • Risto Rikala
    • 3
  • Pirjo Kainulainen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUniversity of KuopioKuopioFinland
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Natural Product Research LaboratoryUniversity of JoensuuJoensuuFinland
  3. 3.Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki Research StationSuonenjokiFinland

Personalised recommendations