Sex Roles

, Volume 36, Issue 11–12, pp 693–707 | Cite as

Rape Myth Acceptance and Sociodemographic Characteristics: A Multidimensional Analysis

  • Barbara E. Johnson
  • Douglas L. Kuck
  • Patricia R. Schander


Many myths have been identified surrounding rape, rapists, and rape victims. This study reexamines the acceptance of rape myths across gender role ideologies and selected demographic characteristics to identify core myths. Three myth categories were established and investigated: blaming the woman, excusing the man, and justifications for acquaintance rape. Findings indicate that rape myths remain prevalent and adherence to myths is related to demographic factors and gender role attitudes. Overall, respondents tend to excuse the man more than blame the woman. Males accept rape myths more than females. Racial differences emerged most strongly on the justifications for acquaintance rape dimension. Individuals with a conservative gender role ideology believe rape myths more than those with more liberal ideologies. While core myths did not emerge from the data, the most revealing finding is that summative scaling techniques used in previous studies may mask important differences, between and within the three dimensions, in rape myth acceptance among the groups studied.


Gender Role Racial Difference Sociodemographic Characteristic Scaling Technique Gender Role Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 217–230.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  3. Deitz, S. R., Littman, M., & Bentley, B. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observing empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Roles, 10, 261–280.Google Scholar
  4. Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Feild, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179.Google Scholar
  6. Giacopassi, D. J., & Dull, T. R. (1986). Gender and racial differences of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 15, 63–75.Google Scholar
  7. Herman, D. F. (1984). The rape culture. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist Perspective (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.Google Scholar
  9. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.Google Scholar
  10. Muehlenhard, C. L., Freidman, D. E., & Thomas, C. M. (1985). Is date rape justified? The effects of dating activity, who initiated, who paid, and men's attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 297–309.Google Scholar
  11. Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. I. (1983). Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perpetuation of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220–232.Google Scholar
  12. Syzmanski, L. A., Devlin, A. S., Chisler, J. C., & Vyse, S. A. (1993). Gender role and attitudes toward rape in male and female college students. Sex Roles, 29, 37–57.Google Scholar
  13. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1996). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1994. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  14. Williams, J. E., & Holmes, K. A. (1981). The second assault: Rape and public attitudes. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara E. Johnson
    • 1
  • Douglas L. Kuck
    • 2
  • Patricia R. Schander
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe University of South Carolina—AikenAiken
  2. 2.University of South CarolinaAiken

Personalised recommendations