Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 36, Issue 9–10, pp 585–603 | Cite as

Psychological Abuse Among College Women in Exclusive Heterosexual Dating Relationships

  • Randolph B. Pipes
  • Karen LeBov-Keeler
Article

Abstract

This study was designed to identify possible predictors of psychological abuse in non-marital heterosexual romantic relationships. In attempting to predict who would self-identify as being psychologically abused, we investigated a number of variables including psychological abuse in past close relationships, psychological abuse within the family of origin, self-esteem, and characteristics of the current relationship, including seriousness and duration of the relationship. Of particular interest in the study was the providing of a definition of psychological abuse with the opportunity for participants to agree that they were or were not in a psychologically abusive relationship. Descriptive statistics are reported that describe the frequency of psychological abuse in a dating population as well as a variety of perceptions of the abuse by victims. Participants were 175 female college students who were either enrolled in undergraduate psychology classes, or were members of a sorority. They were single and reported being currently involved in an exclusive heterosexual dating relationship of at least two months duration. When participants were provided with a definition of psychological abuse, nineteen individuals identified themselves as psychologically abused; 156 individuals identified themselves as non-abused. Psychologically abused participants, when compared with non-abused participants, reported more instances of partner behaviors characteristic of psychological abuse and gave higher estimates of the percentage of women in the study who were currently being psychologically abused (False Consensus Effect). Using regression analysis, we also found that abused individuals were more likely to have lower self-esteem, to come from homes in which their parents' relationship involved psychological abuse, and to report that they were psychologically abused by either their mother or their father.

Keywords

Romantic Relationship College Woman Female College Psychological Abuse Female College Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Allen, T. D., Russell, J. E. A., & Rush, M. C. (1994). The effects of gender and leave of absence on attributions for high performance, perceived organizational commitment, and allocation of organizational rewards. Sex Roles, 31, 443–464.Google Scholar
  2. Carlson, B. E. (1987). Dating violence: A research review and comparison with spouse abuse. Social Casework, 68, 16–23.Google Scholar
  3. Caufield, M. B., & Riggs, D. S. (1992). The assessment of dating aggression: Empirical evaluation of the Conflict Tactics Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 549–559.Google Scholar
  4. Comins, C. A. (1984). Violence between college dating partners: Incidence and contributing factors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn University.Google Scholar
  5. Crandall, R. (1973). The measurement of self-esteem and related constructs. In J. Robinson & P. Shaver (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes (rev. ed.). Ann Arbor Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  6. DeGregoria, B. (1987). Sex role attitude and perception of psychological abuse. Sex Roles, 16, 227–235.Google Scholar
  7. Felmlee, D. H. (1994). Who's on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 31, 275–295.Google Scholar
  8. Graham, D. L. R., Rawlings, E. I., & Rigsby, R. K. (1994). Loving to survive: Sexual terror, men's violence, and women's lives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffman, P. (1984). Psychological abuse of women by spouses and live-in lovers. Women and Therapy, 3, 37–47.Google Scholar
  10. Hornung, C. A., McCullough, B. C., & Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 675–692.Google Scholar
  11. Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1986). Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 102–109.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kasian, M., & Painter, S. L. (1992). Frequency and severity of psychological abuse in a dating population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 350–364.Google Scholar
  14. Kasper, S. (1982). Judgements of professional and nonprofessional men and women about psychological abuse in marriage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University.Google Scholar
  15. Laner, M. R., & Thompson, J. (1982). Abuse and aggression in courting couples. Deviant Behavior, 3, 229–244.Google Scholar
  16. Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97–102.Google Scholar
  17. Mason, A., & Blankenship, V. (1987). Power and affiliation motivation, stress, and abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 203–210.Google Scholar
  18. O'Hearn, R. E., & Davis, K. E. (in press). Women's experience of giving and receiving emotional abuse: An attachment perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.Google Scholar
  19. Okun, L. (1986). Woman abuse: Facts replacing myths. Albany State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., Sidanius, J., & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37–53.Google Scholar
  21. Robins, R. W., Spranca, M. D., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1996). The actor-observer effect revisited: Effects of individuals differences and repeated social interactions on actor and observer attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 375–389.Google Scholar
  22. Robinson, R., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: “Naive realism” in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 404–417.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenthal, P. (1996). Gender and managers' causal attributions for subordinate performance: A field story. Sex Roles, 34, 1–15.Google Scholar
  25. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.Google Scholar
  26. Roy, M. (1977). A current survey of 150 cases. In M. Roy (Ed.), Battered women. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  27. Shaver, P., & Hendrick, C. (Eds.). (1987). Sex and gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Shepard, M. F., & Campbell, J. A. (1992). The Abusive Behavior Inventory: A measure of psychological and physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 291–305.Google Scholar
  29. Silber, E., & Tippett, J. (1965). Self-esteem: Clinical assessment and measurement validation. Psychological Reports, 16, 1017–1071.Google Scholar
  30. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.Google Scholar
  31. Tolman, R. M. (1989). The initial development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159–178.Google Scholar
  32. Tolman, R. M. (1992). Psychological abuse of women. In R. T. Ammerman & M. Hersen (Eds.), Assessment of family violence: A clinical and legal source book. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Tolman, R. M., & Bhosley, G. (1991). The outcome of participation in a shelter sponsored program for men who batter. In D. Knudsen & J. Miller (Eds.), Abused and battered: Social and legal responses to family violence. Hawthorne, NY: Adline, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  34. Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  35. Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Walker, L. E. (1994). Abused women and survivor therapy: A practical guide for the psychotherapist. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  37. Willis, C. E., Hallinan, M. N., & Melby, J. (1996). Effects of sex role stereotyping among European American students on domestic violence culpability attributions. Sex Roles, 34, 475–491.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117–142.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randolph B. Pipes
    • 1
  • Karen LeBov-Keeler
    • 1
  1. 1.Auburn UniversityAuburn

Personalised recommendations