Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 37, Issue 5–6, pp 335–359 | Cite as

Power and Personality: An Analysis of Gay Male Intimate Abuse

  • Monica A. Landolt
  • Donald G. Dutton
Article

Abstract

A study was conducted to investigate the issue of gay male intimate abuse in a sample of 52 couples. The objective of the study was to explore the association between relationship power dynamics and the perpetration of psychological abuse, and to investigate the correspondence between intimate abuse and factors associated with the Abusive Personality [D. G. Dutton and A. J. Starzomski (1993) “Borderline Personality in Perpetrators of Psychological and Physical Abuse,” Violence and Victims, Vol. 8, pp. 327–337; D. G. Dutton (1994a) “Behavioral and Affective Correlates of Borderline Personality Organization in Wife Assaulters,” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Vol. 17, pp. 265–279.] The majority of participants were middle to upper class and their ethnic/racial breakdown is as follows: White (86%), Native American (7%), Asian (4%), and Other (3%). In terms of power, results indicated that the more frequent form of psychological abuse was significantly higher in relationships characterized by divided power (i.e., partners sharing decision-making authority by the partners each making decisions in different domains). This finding supports the supposition that abuse can occur in relatively egalitarian relationships. An association between intimate abuse and the Abusive Personality was also clearly observed and this personality profile seemed to characterize both members of abusive dyads. Conclusions are drawn regarding the generalizability of intimate abuse across lines of sexual orientation.

Keywords

Social Psychology Sexual Orientation Physical Abuse Power Dynamic Frequent Form 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147–178.Google Scholar
  2. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. S. (1978). Homosexualities: A study of diversity among men and women. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. (1981). Sexual preference: Its development in men and women. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  5. Berk, R. A., Berk, S. F., Loseke, D. R., & Rauma, D. (1981). Mutual combat and other family violence myths. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Blood, R., Jr. & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In M. Bograd & K. Yllo (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Browne, A. (1992). Are women as violent as men? Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, D. H., & Straus, M. A. (1986). Marital power, conflict, and violence. Violence and Victims, 1, 141–157.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. L. (1990). Adult attachment, working models and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 644–663.Google Scholar
  11. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dutton, D. G. (1994a). Behavioral and affective correlates of Borderline Personality Organization in wife assaulters. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 17, 265–279.Google Scholar
  13. Dutton, D.G. (1994b). Patriarchy and wife assault: The ecological fallacy. Violence and Victims, 9, 167–182.Google Scholar
  14. Dutton, D. G., & Starzomski, A. J. (1993). Borderline personality in perpetrators of psychological and physical abuse. Violence and Victims, 8, 327–337.Google Scholar
  15. Dutton, D. G., Starzomski, A. J., & Ryan, L. (1996). Antecedents of borderline personality organization in wife assaulters. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 113–132.Google Scholar
  16. Dutton, D. G., Saunders, K., Starzomski, A., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Intimacy-anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1367–1386.Google Scholar
  17. Farley, N. (1996). A survey of factors contributing to gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 4, 35–42.Google Scholar
  18. Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence. New York: Simon & Shuster.Google Scholar
  19. Gerslma, A., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Arrindell, W. A. (1990). Anxiety, depression and perception of early parenting: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 251–277.Google Scholar
  20. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (1996). On the statistics of interdependence: Treating dyadic data with respect. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed.). Chichester, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  21. Gray-Little, B., & Burk, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538.Google Scholar
  22. Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships: Attachment processes in adulthood (Vol. 5). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  23. Gunderson, J. G. (1984). Borderline Personality Disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hamberger, L. K., & Hastings, J. E. (1986). Characteristics of male spouse abusers: Is psychopathology part of the picture? Paper presented at American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  25. Hamberger, L. K., & Hastings, J. E. (1991). Personality correlates of men who batter and nonviolent men: Some continuities and discontinuities. Journal of Family Violence, 6, 131–147.Google Scholar
  26. Hamberger, L. K., & Potente, T. (1994). Counseling heterosexual women arrested for domestic violence: Implication for theory and practice. Violence and Victims, 9, 125–137.Google Scholar
  27. Harry, J. (1982). Gay children grown up: Gender culture and gender deviance. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  28. Harry, J. (1984). Gay couples. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Harry, J. (1989). Parental physical abuse and sexual orientation in males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 251–261.Google Scholar
  30. Harry, J. (1990). A probability sample of gay males. Journal of Homosexuality, 19, 89–104.Google Scholar
  31. Hart, S. D., Dutton, D. G., & Newlove, T. (1993). The prevalence of personality disorder among wife assaulters. Journal of Personality Disorders, 7, 328–340.Google Scholar
  32. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Conceptualizing romantic love as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.Google Scholar
  33. Herman, J. L., Perry, J. C. & van der Kolk, B. A. (1989). Childhood trauma in Borderline Personality Disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 490–495.Google Scholar
  34. Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  35. Island, D., & Letellier, P. (1991). Men who beat the men who love them. New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kasian, M., & Painter, S. (1992). Frequency and severity of psychological abuse in a dating population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 350–364.Google Scholar
  37. Kelly, E. E., & Warshafsky, L. (July, 1987). Partner abuse in gay male and lesbian couples. Paper presented at the Third National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, NH.Google Scholar
  38. Kenny, D. A. (1988). The analysis of data from two-person relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  39. Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294.Google Scholar
  40. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Kernberg, O. (1977). The structural diagnosis of borderline personality organization. In P. Hartocollis (Ed.), Borderline Personality Disorder: The concept, the syndrome, the patient. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  42. Letellier, P. (1994). Gay and bisexual male domestic violence victimization: Challenges to feminist theory. Violence and Victims, 9, 125–136.Google Scholar
  43. Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  44. McWhirter, D. P., & Mattison, A. M. (1984). The male couple. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Merrill, G. S. (1996). Ruling the exceptions: Same-sex battering and domestic violence theory. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 4, 9–21.Google Scholar
  46. Oldham, J., Clarkin, J., Appelbaum, A., Carr, A., Kernberg, P., Lotterman, A., & Haas, G. (1985). A self-report instrument for Borderline Personality Organization. In T. H. McGlashan (Ed.), The Borderline: Current empirical research. The progress in psychiatry series. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  47. Olson, D. H., & Cromwell, R. E. (1975). Power in families. In R. E. Cromwell, & D. H. Olson (Eds.), Power in families. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Peplau, L. A. (1993). Lesbian and gay relationships. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay male experiences. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Peplau, L. A., & Gordon, S. L. (1983). The intimate relationships of lesbian and gay men. In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.), The changing boundaries: Gender roles and sexual behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  50. Perris, C., Jacobsson, L., Lindstrom, H., von Knorring, L., & Perris, H. (1980). Development of a new inventory for assessing memories of parental rearing behaviors. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 61, 265–274.Google Scholar
  51. Reece, R., & Segrist, A. E. (1981). The association of selected “masculine” sex-role variables with length of relationship in gay male couples. Journal of Homosexuality, 7, 33–47.Google Scholar
  52. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  53. Ross, M. W., Campbell, R. L., & Clayter, J. R. (1982). New inventory of measurement of parental rearing patterns: An English form of the EMBU. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 66, 499–507.Google Scholar
  54. Saghir, M. T., & Robins, E. (1973). Male and female homosexuality: A comprehensive investigation. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  55. Saunders, D. G. (1988). Other “truths” about domestic violence: A reply to McNeely and Robinson-Simpson. Social Work, 33, 179–183.Google Scholar
  56. Siegel, J. M. (1986). The multidimensional anger inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 191–200.Google Scholar
  57. Silverstein, C. (1988). The borderline personality disorder and gay people. Journal of Homosexuality, 15, 185–211.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, M. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of the feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257–273.Google Scholar
  59. Stets, J., & Straus, M. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  60. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring family conflict and violence: The conflict tactics scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.Google Scholar
  61. Symons, D. (1980). The Evolution of human sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159–177.Google Scholar
  63. van der Kolk, B. (1987). Psychological trauma. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  64. Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  65. Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Walker, L. E. (1989). Psychology and violence against women. American Psychologist, 44, 695–702.Google Scholar
  67. Whitam, F. L. (1977). Childhood indicators of male homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6, 89–96.Google Scholar
  68. Yllo, K., & Straus, M. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Zimmerman, M., & Coryell, W. (1989). DSM-III personality disorder diagnosis in a nonpatient sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 682–689.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monica A. Landolt
    • 1
  • Donald G. Dutton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations