Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 139–170 | Cite as

Preference Reversals and Induced Risk Preferences: Evidence for Noisy Maximization

  • Joyce E. Berg
  • John W. Dickhaut
  • Thomas A. Rietz


We combine two research lines: preference reversal research (Lichtenstein and Slovic, 1971) and research on lottery-based risk preference induction (Roth and Malouf, 1979). Our results are informative for both research lines. We show that inducing risk preferences in preference reversal experiments has dramatic effects. First, while our subjects still display reversals, they do not display the usual pattern of “predicted” reversals suggested by the compatibility hypothesis. By inducing risk averse and risk loving preferences, we can dramatically reduce reversal rates and even produce the opposite pattern of reversals. Our results are consistent with the assumption that subjects maximize expected utility with error. This provides evidence that Camerer and Hogarth's (1999) framework for incentive effects can be extended to include the risk preference induction reward scheme.

preference reversal risk preference induction incentives expected utility theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berg, Joyce E., Lane A. Daley, John W. Dickhaut, and John R. O'Brien. (1986). "Controlling Preferences for Lotteries on Units of Experimental Exchange," Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 281–306.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, Joyce E., John W. Dickhaut, and John R. O'Brien. (1985). "Preference Reversal and Arbitrage," In Vernon Smith (ed.), Research in Experimental Economics. Greenwich: JA Press, Vol. 3, pp. 31–72.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, Joyce E., John W. Dickhaut, and Thomas A. Rietz. (2002). "Preference Reversals: The Impact of Truth-Revealing Incentives," Working Paper, the University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, Joyce E., John W. Dickhaut, and Thomas A. Rietz. (2003). "On the Performance of Lottery Procedures for Controlling Risk Preferences," Forthcoming in Charles R. Plott and Vernon Smith (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Bostic, Raphael, Richard J. Herrnstein, and R. Duncan Luce. (1990). "The Effect on the Preference-Reversal Phenomenon of Using Choice Indifferences," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 13, 193–212.Google Scholar
  6. Camerer, Colin F. and Robin M. Hogarth. (1999). "The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 7–42.Google Scholar
  7. Cox, James C. and David M. Grether. (1996). "The Preference Reversal Phenomenon: Response Mode, Markets and Incentives," Economic Theory 7, 381–405.Google Scholar
  8. Cox James C. and Ronald L. Oaxaca. (1995). "Inducing Risk-Neutral Preferences: Further Analysis of the Data," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 11, 65–79.Google Scholar
  9. Goldstein, William M. and Hillel J. Einhorn. (1987). "Expression Theory and the Preference Reversal Phenomena," Psychological Review 94, 236–254.Google Scholar
  10. Grether, David M. and Charles R. Plott. (1979). "Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon," American Economic Review 69, 623–638.Google Scholar
  11. Hamm, Robert M. (1979). "The Conditions of Occurrence of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon." Unpublished doctoral thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  12. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky. (1979). "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," Econometrica 47, 263–291.Google Scholar
  13. Karni, Edi and Zvi Safra. (1987). "'Preference Reversal' and the Observability of Preferences by Experimental Methods," Econometrica 55, 675–685.Google Scholar
  14. Lichtenstein, Sarah and Paul Slovic. (1971). "Reversals of Preference Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions," Journal of Experimental Psychology 89, 46–55.Google Scholar
  15. Lichtenstein, Sarah and Paul Slovic. (1973). "Response-Induced Reversals of Preference in Gambling: An Extended Replication in Las Vegas," Journal of Experimental Psychology 101, 16–20.Google Scholar
  16. Loomes, Graham, Chris Starmer, and Robert Sugden. (1989). "Preference Reversal: Information-Processing Effect Or Rational Non-Transitive Choice?," Economic Journal 99, 140–151.Google Scholar
  17. Loomes, Graham and Robert Sugden. (1983). "A Rationale for Preference Reversal," American Economic Review 73, 428–432.Google Scholar
  18. Luce, R. Duncan. (2000). Utility of Gains and Losses. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Prasnikar, Vesna. (2001). "How Well Does Utility Maximization Approximate Subjects' Behavior? An Experimental Study." Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  20. Rietz, Thomas A. (1993). "Implementing and Testing Risk Preference Induction Mechanisms in Experimental Sealed Bid Auctions," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 199–213.Google Scholar
  21. Reilly, Robert J. (1982). "Preference Reversal: Further Evidence and Some Suggested Modifications in Experimental Design," American Economic Review 72, 576–584.Google Scholar
  22. Roth, Alvin E. and Michael W.K. Malouf. (1979). "Game-Theoretic Models and the Role of Bargaining," Psychological Review 86, 574–594.Google Scholar
  23. Schkade, David A. and Eric J. Johnson. (1989). "Cognitive Processes in Preference Reversal," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 44, 203–231.Google Scholar
  24. Schotter, Andrew and Yale M. Braunstein. (1981). "Economic Search: An Experimental Study," Economic Inquiry 19, 1–25.Google Scholar
  25. Segal, Uzi. (1988). "Does the Preference Reversal Phenomenon Necessarily Contradict the Independence Axiom?," American Economic Review 78, 233–236.Google Scholar
  26. Selten, Reinhard, Abdolkarim Sadrieh, and Klaus Abbink. (1999). "Money Does Not Induce Risk Neutral Behavior, But Binary Lotteries Do Even Worse," Theory and Decision 46, 211–249.Google Scholar
  27. Tversky, Amos, Paul Slovic, and Daniel Kahneman. (1990). "The Causes of Preference Reversal," American Economic Review 80, 204–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joyce E. Berg
    • 1
  • John W. Dickhaut
    • 2
  • Thomas A. Rietz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Accounting, Henry B. Tippie College of BusinessUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Accounting, Carlson School of ManagementUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Finance, Henry B. Tippie College of BusinessUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations