Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 231–240 | Cite as

Nesting and Fitness: Lifetime Reproductive Success in House Mice Bidirectionally Selected for Thermoregulatory Nest-Building Behavior

  • Abel Bult
  • Carol B. Lynch
Article

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that large, well-built, nests are an important component of fitness, we kept 12 mating pairs of two high-selected, two control, and two low-selected lines, selected for therrnoregulatory nest-building behavior, at 22 and 4°C with access to 10 g of cotton to build a nest, for a period of 180 days. Measurements included number of litters bom per family, number of young per litter born and surviving up to 40 days of age, nest type built by the parents, and weight gain of the young from weaning (20 days of age) to 40 days of age. In all lines the production and survival of offspring was substantially decreased at 4°C compared to 22°C, but the high-selected lines produced more and better-quality offspring, surviving up to 40 days of age at both temperatures compared to the control and low-selected lines. This indicates that thermoregulatory nest-building behavior and evolutionary fitness are closely associated.

Lifetime reproductive success nest-building behavior fitness Mus domesticus selection adaptive evolution compensatory evolution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Barnett, S. A., and Dickson, R. G. (1989). Wild mice in the cold: Some findings on adaptation. Biol. Rev. 64:317–340.Google Scholar
  2. Bult, A., and Lynch, C. B. (1996). Multiple selection responses in house mice bidirectionally selected for thermoregulatory nest-building behavior: Crosses of replicate lines. Behav. Genet. 26:439–446.Google Scholar
  3. Bult, A., Van der Zee, E. A., Compaan, J. C., and Lynch, C. B. (1992). Differences in the number of arginine-vasopressin immunoreactive neurons exist in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of house mice selected for differences in nest-building behavior. Brain Res. 578:335–338.Google Scholar
  4. Bult, A., Hiestand, L., Van der Zee, E. A., and Lynch, C. B. (1993). Circadian rhythms differ between selected mouse lines: A model to study the role of vasopressin neurons in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Brain Res. Bull. 32:623–627.Google Scholar
  5. Cohan, F. M., King, E. C., and Zawadzki, P. (1994). Amelioration of the deleterious pleiotropic effects of an adaptive mutation in Bacillus subtilis. Evolution 48:81–95.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, R. A. (1928). The possible modification of the responses of wild type to recurrent mutations. Am. Nat. 62:115–126.Google Scholar
  7. Glaser, H., and Lustick, S. (1975). Energetics and nesting behavior of the northern white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus noveboracensis. Physiol. Zool. 48:105–113.Google Scholar
  8. Haldane, J. B. S. (1932). The Causes of Evolution, Harper, New York.Google Scholar
  9. King, J. A., Maas, D., and Weisman, R. G. (1964). Geographic variation in nest size among species of Peromyscus. Evolution 18:230–234.Google Scholar
  10. Laffan, E. A. (1989). Artificial Selection for Thermoregulatory Nest-Building in the House Mouse: Analysis of the Lines at Their Limits, Ph.D. dissertation, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT.Google Scholar
  11. Lenski, R. E. (1988). Experimental studies of pleiotropy and epistasis in Escherichia coli. I. Variation in competitive fitness among mutants resistant to virus T4. Evolution 42:425–432.Google Scholar
  12. Lynch, C. B. (1977). Inbreeding effects upon animals derived from a wild population of Mus musculus. Evolution 31:526–537.Google Scholar
  13. Lynch, C. B. (1980). Response to divergent selection for nesting behavior in Mus musculus. Genetics 96:757–765.Google Scholar
  14. Lynch, C. B. (1981). Genetic correlation between two types of nesting in Mus musculus: Direct and indirect selection. Behav. Genet. 11:267–272.Google Scholar
  15. Lynch, C. B. (1992). Clinal variation in cold adaptation in Mus domesticus: Verification of predictions from laboratory populations. Am. Nat. 139:1219–1236.Google Scholar
  16. Lynch, C. B., and Possidente, B. P. (1978). Relationships of maternal nesting to thermoregulatory nesting in the house mouse (Mus musculus) at warm and cold temperatures. Anim. Behav. 26:1136–1143.Google Scholar
  17. Lynch, C. B., Roberts, R. C., and Hill, W. G. (1986). Heterosis among lines of mice selected for large and small size. 3. Thermoregulation. Genet. Res. 48:95–100.Google Scholar
  18. Marsteller, F. A., and Lynch, C. B. (1983). Reproductive consequences of food restriction at low temperature in lines of mice divergently selected for thermoregulatory nesting. Behav. Genet. 13:397–410.Google Scholar
  19. Marsteller, F. A., and Lynch, C. B. (1987). Energetic aspects of mammalian reproduction. II. Mating and pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 37:838–843.Google Scholar
  20. Muul, I. (1968). Behavioral and physiological influences on the distribution of the flying squirrel, Glaucomys volans. Misc. Publ. Univ. Mich. Mus. Zool. 134:1–66.Google Scholar
  21. Pearson, O. P. (1960). The oxygen consumption and bioenergetics of the harvest mouse. Physiol. Zool. 33:152–160.Google Scholar
  22. Plomin, R. J., and Manosevitz, M. (1974). Behavioral polytypism in wild Mus musculus. Behav. Genet. 4:145–157.Google Scholar
  23. Schneider, J. E., and Lynch, C. B. (1984). Investigation of a common physiological mechanism underlying progesterone-induced and maternal nesting in mice, Mus musculus. J. Comp. Psychol. 98:165–176.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology DepartmentWesleyan UniversityMiddletown
  2. 2.Department of Environmental, Population and Organismic BiologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulder

Personalised recommendations