Plant and Soil

, Volume 254, Issue 2, pp 383–391

Arbuscular mycorrhizae respond to plants exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2 as a function of soil depth

Article

Abstract

The importance of arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) in plant and ecosystem responses to global changes, e.g. elevated atmospheric CO2, is widely acknowledged. Frequently, increases in AM root colonization occur in response to increased CO2, but also the lack of significant changes has been reported. The goal of this study was to test whether arbuscular mycorrhizae (root colonization and composition of root colonization) respond to plants grown in elevated CO2 as a function of soil depth. We grew Bromus hordeaceus L. and Lotus wrangelianus Fischer & C. Meyer monocultures in large pots with a synthetic serpentine soil profile for 4 yr in an experiment, in which CO2 concentration was crossed factorially with NPK fertilization. When analyzing root infection separately for topsoil (0–15 cm) and subsoil (15–45 cm), we found large (e.g., about 5-fold) increases of AM fungal root colonization in the subsoil in response to CO2, but no significant changes in the corresponding topsoil of Bromus. Only the coarse endophyte AM fungi, not the fine endophyte AM fungi, were responsible for the observed increase in the bottom soil layer, indicating a depth-dependent shift in the AM community colonizing the roots, even at this coarse morphological level. Other response variables also had significant soil layer * CO2 interaction terms. The subsoil response would have been hidden in an unstratified assessment of the total root system, since most of the root length was concentrated in the top soil layer. The increased presence of mycorrhizae in roots deeper in the soil should be considered in sampling protocols, as it may be indicative of changed patterns of nutrient acquisition and carbon sequestration.

Bromus fine endophyte grassland Lotus roots soil carbon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen M F 1991 The Ecology of Mycorrhizae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Arnone J A, Zaller J G, Spehn E M, Niklaus P A, Wells C E and Korner C 2000 Dynamics of root systems in native grasslands: effects of elevated atmospheric CO2. New Phytol. 147, 73–85.Google Scholar
  3. Brundrett M 1994 Clearing and staining mycorrhizal roots. In Practical methods in mycorrhiza research. Eds. M Brundrett, L Melville and L Peterson. pp. 42–46. Mycologue Publications, Waterloo (Canada).Google Scholar
  4. Day F P, Weber E P, Hinkle C R and Drake B G 1996 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on fine root length and distribution in an oak-palmetto scrub ecosystem in central Florida. Global Change Biol. 2, 143–148.Google Scholar
  5. Dhillion S S, Roy J and Abrams M 1996 Assessing the impact of elevated CO2 on soil microbial activity in aMediterranean model ecosystem. Plant Soil 187, 333–342.Google Scholar
  6. Field C B, Chapin F S, Chiariello N R, Holland E A and Mooney H A 1996 The Jasper Ridge CO2 experiment: design and motivation. In Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems. Eds. G W Koch and H A Mooney. pp. 121–145. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  7. Fitter A H, Heinemeyer A and Staddon P L 2000 The impact of elevated CO2 and global climate change on arbuscular mycorrhizas: a mycocentric approach. New Phytol. 147, 179–187.Google Scholar
  8. Fitter A H, Graves J D, Wolfenden J, Self G K, Brown T K, Bogie D and Mansfield T A 1997 Root production and turnover and carbon budgets of two contrasting grasslands under ambient and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. New Phytol. 137, 247–255.Google Scholar
  9. Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Morandi D, Dexheimer J and Gianinazzi S 1981 Ultrastructure and ultracytochemical features of Glomus tenuis mycorrhiza. New Phytol. 88, 633–639.Google Scholar
  10. Godbold D L, Berntson G M and Bazzaz F A 1997 Growth and mycorrhizal colonization of three north American tree species under elevated atmospheric CO2. New Phytol. 137, 433–440.Google Scholar
  11. Hickman J C (ed) 1993 The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  12. Hodge A 1996 Impact of elevated CO2 on mycorrhizal associations and implications for plant growth. Biology Fert Soils 23, 388–398.Google Scholar
  13. Jongen M, Fay P and Jones M B 1996 Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and arbuscular mycorrhizal infection on Trifolium repens. New Phytol. 132, 413–423.Google Scholar
  14. Klironomos J N, Rillig M C and Allen M F 1999 Designing belowground field experiments with the help of semi-variance and power analyses. Appl. Soil Ecol. 12, 227–238.Google Scholar
  15. Klironomos J N, Ursic M, Rillig M C and Allen M F 1998 Interspecific differences in the response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to Artemisia tridentata grown under elevated atmospheric CO2. New Phytol. 138, 599–605.Google Scholar
  16. Klironomos J N, Rillig M C and Allen M F 1996 Below-ground microbial and microfaunal responses to Artemisia tridentata grown under elevated atmospheric CO2. Funct. Ecol. 10, 527–534.Google Scholar
  17. Klironomos J N, Rillig M C, Allen M F, Zak D R, Kubiske M and Pregitzer K S 1997 Soil fungal-arthropod responses to Populus tremuloides grown under enriched atmospheric CO2 under field conditions. Global Change Biol. 3, 473–478.Google Scholar
  18. Koide R T and Mooney H A 1987 Spatial variation in inoculum potential of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi caused by formation of gopher mounds. New Phytol. 107, 173–182.Google Scholar
  19. Lovelock C E, Kyllo D and Winter K 1996 Growth responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and elevated CO2 in seedlings of a tropical tree, Beilschmiedia pendula. Funct. Ecol. 10, 662–667.Google Scholar
  20. McGonigle T P, Miller M H, Evans D G, Fairchild G L and Swan J A 1990 A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 115, 495–501.Google Scholar
  21. Monz C A, Hunt H W, Reeves F B and Elliott E T 1994 The response of mycorrhizal colonization to elevated CO2 and climate change in Pascopyrum smithii and Bouteloua gracilis. Plant Soil 165, 75–80.Google Scholar
  22. Morgan J A, Knight W G, Dudley L M and Hunt H W 1994 Enhanced root system C-sink activity, water relations and aspects of nutrient acquisition in mycotrophic Bouteloua gracilis subjected to CO2 enrichment. Plant Soil 165, 139–146.Google Scholar
  23. O'Neill E G 1994 Responses of soil biota to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Soil 165, 55–65.Google Scholar
  24. Prior S A, Rogers H H, Runion G B, Hendrey G R 1994 Free-air carbon enrichment of cotton: vertical and lateral root distribution patterns. Plant Soil 165, 33–44.Google Scholar
  25. Rillig M C, Treseder K K and Allen M F 2002 Global change and mycorrhizal fungi. In Mycorrhizal Ecology. Eds. M G A van der Heijden and I Sanders. pp. 135–160. Ecological Studies 157, Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  26. Rillig M C, Hernandez G and Newton P C D 2000 Arbuscular mycorrhizae respond to elevated atmospheric CO2 after long-term exposure: evidence from a CO2 spring in New Zealand supports the resource balance model. Ecol. Lett. 3, 475–478.Google Scholar
  27. Rillig M C and Allen M F 1999 What is the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant-to-ecosystem responses to elevated atmospheric CO2? Mycorrhiza 9, 1–8.Google Scholar
  28. Rillig M C, Allen M F and Field C B 1999a Soil biota responses to long-term atmospheric CO2 enrichment in two California annual grasslands. Oecologia 119, 572–577.Google Scholar
  29. Rillig M C, Field C B and Allen M F 1999b Fungal root colonization responses in natural grasslands after long-term exposure to elevated CO2. Global Change Biol. 5, 577–585.Google Scholar
  30. Rogers H H, Peterson C M, McCrimmon J N and Cure J D 1992 Response of plant roots to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 749–752.Google Scholar
  31. Rouhier H and Read D J 1998 The role of mycorrhiza in determining the response of Plantago lanceolata to CO2 enrichment. New Phytol. 139, 367–373.Google Scholar
  32. Runion G B, Curl E A, Rogers H H, Backman P A, Rodriguez-Kabana R and Helms B E 1994 Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment on microbial populations in the rhizosphere and phyllosphere of cotton. Agric. For. Meteorol. 70, 117–130.Google Scholar
  33. Sanders I R, Streitwolf-Engel R, van der Heijden M G A, Boller T and Wiemken A 1998 Increased allocation to external hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under CO2 enrichment. Oecologia 117, 496–503Google Scholar
  34. Staddon P L, Graves J D and Fitter A H 1998 Effect of enhanced atmospheric CO2 on mycorrhizal colonization by Glomus mosseae in Plantago lanceolata and Trifolium repens. New Phytol. 139, 571–580.Google Scholar
  35. Syvertsen J P and Graham J H 1999 Phosphorus supply and arbuscular mycorrhizas increase growth and net gas exchanged responses of two Citrus spp. grown at elevated [CO2]. Plant Soil 208, 209–219.Google Scholar
  36. Tennant D 1975 Test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63, 995–1001.Google Scholar
  37. Treseder K K and Allen M F 2000 Mycorrhizal fungi have a potential role in soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. New Phytol. 147, 189–200.Google Scholar
  38. Van Vuuren M M I, Robinson D, Fitter A H, Chasalow S D, Williamson L and Raven J A 1997 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and soil water availability on root biomass, root length, and N, P and K uptake by wheat. New Phytol. 135, 455–465.Google Scholar
  39. Whitbeck J E 1994 Effects of Above-and Belowground Resource Distribution on the Ecology of Vesicular-arbuscular Mycorrhizas. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Microbial Ecology Program, Division of Biological SciencesThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Global EcologyCarnegie Institution of WashingtonStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations