Advertisement

Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 315–335 | Cite as

Towards an Organizational Model of Attitude Change

  • Luis Almeida Costa
  • João Amaro de Matos
Article

Abstract

Building on the growing literature that views organizations as complex adaptive systems, this paper proposes a general model to analyze the relationship between organizational context and attitudes. In particular, we focus on how the system of formal and informal communication channels that characterize an organization and the timing of information flows affect the dynamic process of attitude change. We also use a stylized version of the model to illustrate how the general framework is able to generate insights that are relevant to particular situations.

social networks influence attitudes alignment of attitudes organizational design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1987), “Attitudes, Traits and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 1–63.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1988), Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein (1977), “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research,” Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, P. (1999), “Complexity Theory and Organization Science,” Organization Science, 10, 216–232.Google Scholar
  5. Bueno de Mesquita, B. and F.N. Stokman (Eds.) (1994), European Community Decision Making: Models Applications and Comparisons. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  6. Burkhart, R. (1996), “The SWARN Simulator: Applications in Science and Business,” Embracing Complexity: Exploring the application of Complex Adaptive Systems to Business, Ernst & Young Center for Business Innovation, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Brief, A.P. (1998), Attitudes in and Around Organizations. Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Carley, K. and Z. Lin (1997), “A Theoretical Study of Organizational Performance Under Information Distortion,” Management Science, 43(7), 976–997.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, J.S. (1972), “Systems of Social Exchange,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 145–163.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, J.S. (1973), “Loss of Power,” American Sociological Review, 38, 1–17.Google Scholar
  11. DeGroot, M. (1974), “Reaching a Consensus,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 118–121.Google Scholar
  12. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1974), “Attitudes Towards Objects as Predictors of Single and Multiple Behavioral Criteria,” Psychological Review, 81, 59–74.Google Scholar
  13. French, J. Jr. (1956), “A Formal Theory of Social Power,” The Psychological Review, 63, 181–194.Google Scholar
  14. Friedkin, N. (1986), “A Formal Theory of Social Power,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12, 103–126.Google Scholar
  15. Friedkin, N. (1990), “Social Networks in Structural Equations Models,” Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 316–328.Google Scholar
  16. Friedkin, N. (1991), “Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures,” American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1478–1504.Google Scholar
  17. Friedkin, N. (1993), “Structural Bases of Interpersonal Influence in Groups:ALongitudinal Case Study,” American Sociological Review, 58, 861–872.Google Scholar
  18. Friedkin, N. and K. Cook (1990), “Peer Group Influence,” Sociological Methods and Research, 19, 122–143.Google Scholar
  19. Friedkin, N. and E. Johnsen (1990), “Social Influence and Opinions,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15, 193–205.Google Scholar
  20. Friedkin, N. and E. Johnsen (1997), “Social Positions in Influent Networks,” Social Networks, 19, 209–222.Google Scholar
  21. Griffin, R.W. (1983), “Objective and Social Sources of Information in Task Redesign: A Field Experiment,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 184–200.Google Scholar
  22. Heider, F. (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Heydebrand, W. (1989), “New Organizational Forms,” Work and Occupations, 16, 323–357.Google Scholar
  24. Hubbell, C. (1965), “An Input-Output Approach to Clique Identification,” Sociometry, 28, 377–399.Google Scholar
  25. Hummon, N.P. and T.J. Fararo (1995), “Actors and Networks as Objects,” Social Networks, 17, 1–26.Google Scholar
  26. Jick, T.D. (1993), Managing Change. Irwin.Google Scholar
  27. Kanter, R.M., B.A. Stein and T.D. Jick (1992), The Challenge of Organizational Change. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Katz, L. (1953), “A New Status Index Derived from Sociometric Analysis,” Psychometrika, 18, 39–43.Google Scholar
  29. Kotter, J.P. and J.L. Heskett (1992), Corporate Culture and Performance. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Krackhardt, D. and J.R. Hanson (1993), “Informal Networks: The Company Behind the Chart,” Harvard Business Review, 71, 104–111.Google Scholar
  31. Krackhardt, D. and R.N. Stern (1988), “Informal Networks and Organizational Crisis: An Experimental Simulation,” Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123–140.Google Scholar
  32. Lawrence, P.R. and J.W. Lorsch (1967), Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  33. Marsden, P. (1981), “Introducing Influence Processes into a System of Collective Decisions,” American Journal of Sociology, 86, 1203–1235.Google Scholar
  34. Mintzberg, H. (1983), Structures in Five: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  35. Pratkanis, A. and M. Turner (1994), “Of What Value is a Job Attitude? A Socio-Cognitive Analysis,” Human Relations, 47, 1545.Google Scholar
  36. Salancik, G.R. and J. Pfeffer (1978), “A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.Google Scholar
  37. Sanders, K., T. Snijders and F.N. Stokman (1998), “Editorial: Effects and Outcomes of Informal RelationsWithin Organizations,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 4, 103–108.Google Scholar
  38. Schein, E.H. (1985), Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, Sab Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  39. Stokman, F.N. (2001), Social Networks. International Encycolpedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  40. Stokman, F.N. and R. Van Oosten (1994), “The Exchange of Voting Positions: An Object-Oriented Model of Policy Networks,” in B. Bueno de Mesquita and F.N. Stokman (Eds.) European Community Decision Making: Models Applications and Comparisons, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 105–127.Google Scholar
  41. Simon, H.A. (1996), The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  42. Weiss, H.M. and C.E. Nowicki (1981), “Social Influence on Task Satisfaction: Model Competence and Observer Field Dependence,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 345–366.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Almeida Costa
    • 1
  • João Amaro de Matos
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculdade de EconomiaUniversidade Nova de LisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations