Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 285, Issue 2, pp 429–449 | Cite as

Redshift periodicities, The Galaxy-Quasar Connection

  • W.G. Tifft


The Lehto-Tifft redshift quantization model is used to predict the redshift distribution for certain classes of quasars, and for galaxies in the neighborhood of z = 0.5. In the Lehto-Tifft model the redshift is presumed to arise from time dependent decay from an origin at the Planck scale; the decay process is a form of period doubling. Looking back in time reveals earlier stages of the process where redshifts should correspond to predictable fractions of the speed of light. Quasar redshift peaks are shown to correspond to the earliest simple fractions of c as predicted by the model. The sharp peaks present in deep field galaxy redshifts surveys are then shown to correspond to later stages in such a decay process. Highly discordant redshift associations are expected to occur and shown to be present in the deep field surveys. Peaks in redshift distributions appear to represent the spectrum of possible states at various stage of the decay process rather than physical structures.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arp, H., Bi, H.G., Chu, Y. and Zhu, X.: 1990, A&A 239, 33.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Burbidge, E.M. and Sargent, W.: 1970, in: D. O'Connel (ed.), Nuclei of Galaxies, North Holland, p. 351.Google Scholar
  3. Burbidge, G.: 1968, ApJ 154, L41.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Burbidge, G.: 1980, Texas Symp. Proc. Ann. New York Acad. of Sci. Google Scholar
  5. Burbidge, G. and Napier, W.M.: 2001, AJ 121, 21.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J.G. et al.: 1996, ApJ 471, L5.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, J.G. et al.: 1999, ApJS 120, 171.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J.G. et al.: 2000, ApJ 538, 29.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Guthrie, B.N.G. and Napier, W.M.: 1991, MNRAS 253, 533.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawkins, E., Maddox, S.J. and Merrifield, M.R.: 2002, MNRAS, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Hoyle, F., Burbidge, G. and Narlikar, J.V.: in: A Different Approach to Cosmology, Cambridge, p. 332.Google Scholar
  12. Karlsson, K.G.: 1977, A&A 58, 237.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Napier, W.M.: in this conference.Google Scholar
  14. Schmidt, M. and Green, R.F.: 1983, ApJ 269, 352.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Tifft, W.G.: 1976, ApJ 206, 18.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Tifft, W.G.: 1996, ApJ 468, 491.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Tifft, W.G.: 1997, ApJ 485, 465.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Tifft, W.G. and Cocke, W.J.: 1984, ApJ 287, 492.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Tifft, W.G. and Cocke, W.J.: 1989, ApJ 336, 128.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Veron-Cetty, M.P. and Veron, P.: 1996, A Catalog of Quasars and Active Galaxies, ESO Scientific Report - electronic form.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • W.G. Tifft
    • 1
  1. 1.Steward ObservatoryUniversity of ArizonaTucsonArizona

Personalised recommendations