Journal of Community Health

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 347–362 | Cite as

Using an Integrated Approach to Understand Vaccination Behavior Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men: Stages of Change, the Health Belief Model, and Self-Efficacy

  • Scott D. Rhodes
  • Kenneth C. Hergenrather
Article

Abstract

Studies continue to show that the majority of men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States remain unvaccinated against hepatitis A (HAV); such limited vaccination coverage is a missed opportunity for preventing disease. This study sought to identify beliefs and attitudes associated with motivational readiness for vaccination against HAV among MSM, using a theoretically-integrated framework. Questionnaire data were collected from 358 MSM through bar outreach. MSM with increased readiness to complete the two-dose series perceived lower practical barriers and reported greater healthcare provider communication about their sexual orientation and risk behavior. They also perceived higher benefits to vaccination and higher severity of infection, and had higher self-efficacy to complete the vaccine series. Relationships between stages of change and theory-based constructs from the health belief model and the social learning theory follow predicted patterns suggesting that these theories may provide useful frameworks for understanding vaccination readiness and intervention strategy development among MSM.

homosexual hepatitis behavior change theory vaccination gay 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Institute of Medicine, Committee on Prevention and Control of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. The Hidden Epidemic: Confronting Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chin J, ed. Control of Communicable Diseases Manual. 17 ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2000, pp 243–251.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of hepatitis A through active or passive immunization: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999; 48:1–37.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hadler SC. Global impact of hepatitis A virus infection: Changing patterns. In FB Hollinger, SM Lemon, HS Margolis (Eds). Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1991, pp 14–20.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedman MS, Blake PA, Koehler JE, Hutwagner LC, Toomey KE. Factors influencing a community-wide campaign to administer hepatitis A vaccine to men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health 2000; 90:1942–1946.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kohler CL, Grimley D, Reynolds K. Theoretical approaches guiding the development and implementation of health promotion programs. In JM Raczynski and RJ Diclemente (Eds). Handbook of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1999, pp 23–49.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Toward a comprehensive model of change. In W Miller and N Heather N (Eds). Treating Addictive Behaviors. New York: Plenum Press, 1986, pp 3–27.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenstock IM: Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr 1974; 2:1–8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: WH Freeman and Sons, 1997, pp 1–78.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grimley DM, Lee PA. Condom and other contraceptive use among a random sample of female adolescents: a snapshot in time. Adolescence 1997; 32:771–779.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson SS, Grimley DM, Prochaska JO. Prediction of adherence using the transtheoretical model: implications for pharmacy care practice. J Social Admin Pharm 1998; 15:135–148.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rhodes SD, Hergenrather KC. Exploring hepatitis B vaccination acceptance among young men who have sex with men: facilitators and barriers. Prev Med 2002; 35:128–134.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rhodes SD, DiClemente RJ, Yee LJ, Hergenrather KC. Correlates of hepatitis B vaccination in a high-risk population: an Internet sample. Am J Med 2001; 110:628–632.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rhodes SD, DiClemente RJ, Yee LJ, Hergenrather KC. Hepatitis B vaccination in a high-risk MSM population: the need for vaccine education. Sex Transm Infect 2000; 76:408–409.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dal-Re R, Gonzalez A, Ramirez V, Ballesteros J, del Romero J, Bru F. Compliance with immunization against hepatitis B. A pragmatic study in sexually transmitted disease clinics. Vaccine 1995; 13:163–167.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dufour A, Remis RS, Alary M, et al. Factors associated with hepatitis B vaccination among men having sexual relations with men in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Omega Study Group. Sex Transm Dis 1999; 26:317–324.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Israsena S, Kamolratanakul P, Sakulramrung R. Factors influencing acceptance of hepatitis B vaccination by hospital personnel in an area hyperendemic for hepatitis B. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87:1807–1809.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hurley JL, Turner HS, Butler KM. Planning and execution of a successful hepatitis B immunization program. J Am Coll Health 2001; 49:189–191.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katz M. Undervaccination for hepatitis B among young men who have sex with men: San Francisco and Berkeley, California. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1996; 45:215–217.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kottenhahn RK, Rosenthal SL, Biro FM. Hepatitis B vaccine completion among adolescents. Del Med J 1996; 68:309–311.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA, Secura GM, McFarland W, Shehan D, Ford W, LaLota M, Celentano DD, Koblin BA, Torian LV, Thiede H, Janssen RS. Two decades after vaccine license: hepatitis B immunization and infection among young men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health 2001; 91:965–971.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Savage RB, Hussey MJ, Hurie MB. A successful approach to immunizing men who have sex with men against hepatitis B. Public Health Nurs 2000,17:202–206.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beaulieu MD, Beland F, Roy D, Falardeau M, Hebert G. Factors determining compliance with screening mammography. Can Med Assoc J 1996; 154:1335–1343.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buchbinder SP, Douglas JM, McKirnan DJ, Judson FN, Katz MH, MacQueen KM. Feasibility of human immunodeficiency virus vaccine trials in homosexual men in the United States: Risk behavior, seroincidence, and willingness to participate. J Infect Dis 1996; 174:954–961.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duclos P, Hatcher J. Epidemiology of influenza vaccination in Canada. Can J Public Health 1993; 84:311–315.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hays RB, Kegeles SM. Factors related to the willingness of young gay men to participate in preventive HIV vaccine trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1999; 20:164–171.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Poss JE. The meanings of tuberculosis for Mexican migrant farmworkers in the United States. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47:195–202.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tello J, Soong SJ, Hunter B, Meriwether R, Hook EW, Mulligan MJ. HIV vaccine acceptance among heterosexual clients of a sexually transmitted diseases clinic. Am J Med Sci 1998; 315: 11–16.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zimet GD, Blythe MJ, Fortenberry JD. Vaccine characteristics and acceptability of HIV immunization among adolescents. Int J STD AIDS 2000; 11:143–149.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grimley DM, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Prochaska GE. Contraceptive and condom use adoption and maintenance: a stage paradigm approach. Health Educ Q 1995; 22:20–35.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sy FS, Rhodes SD, Choi ST, Drociuk D, Laurent AA, Naccash RM, Kettinger LD. The acceptability of oral fluid testing for HIV antibodies. A pilot study in gay bars in a predominantly rural state. Sex Transm Dis 1998; 25:211–215.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, Nizam A. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using multivariate statistics (ed 4th). Needham Heights: MA, Allyn and Bacon, 2001.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    SPSS. SPSS User's Guide, Version 10.0 for Windows. New York: McGraw Hill, 2000.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gay and Lesbian Medical Association. Healthy People 2010 Companion Document for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Health. In. San Francisco, CA: Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, 2001.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kelly JA. HIV prevention interventions with gay or bisexual men and youth. AIDS 2000; 14: S34–39.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rhodes SD, DiClemente RJ, Cecil H, Hergenrather KC, Yee LJ. Risk among men who have sex with men in the United States: a comparison of an Internet sample and a conventional outreach sample. AIDS Educ Prev 2002; 14:41–50.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fishbein M, Pequegnat W.Evaluating AIDS prevention interventions using behavioral and biological outcome measures. Sex Transm Dis 2000; 27:101–110.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Orleans CT. Promoting the maintenance of health behavior change: Recommendations for the next generation of research and practice. Health Psychol 2000; 19:76–83.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    DiClemente RJ, Raczynski JM. The importance of health promotion and disease prevention. In JM Raczynski and RJ DiClemente (Eds). Handbook of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1999, pp 3–9.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Anonymous. Future access to HIV vaccines. Report from a WHO-UNAIDS Consultation, Geneva, 2–3 October 2000. AIDS 2001; 15:W27–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott D. Rhodes
    • 1
  • Kenneth C. Hergenrather
    • 2
  1. 1.Section on Social Sciences and Health Policy, Department of Public Health SciencesWake Forest University Health SciencesWinston-Salem
  2. 2.Department of Counseling/Human and Organizational StudiesGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations