Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 109, Issue 1, pp 99–106

On the Significance of the Webb Correction to Fluxes

  • Claudia Liebethal
  • Thomas Foken


For establishing correct mass or energy balances at the Earth's surface, detailed and correct measurements of air constituent fluxes are needed. Flux measurements obtained from the eddy covariance technique have to pass several corrections of different relevance in order to give correct flux data. One of these corrections, the ‘Webb correction’, is analysed herein from latent heat flux and CO2 flux data recorded during two field experiments. The significance of this correction for the latent heat flux data varies with the air humidity and the Bowen ratio. The correction changes the latent heat flux values only a little, but significantly (by 2 to 3%). For other air constituents (like CO2), the Webb correction is much more important (20 to 30% of the flux).

CO2 flux Eddy covariance Latent heat flux Webb correction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernhardt, K. and Piazena, H.: 1988, ‘Zum Einfluss turbulenzbedingter Dichteschwankungen auf die Bestimmung turbulenter Austauschströme in der Bodenschicht’, Z. Meteorol. 38, 234–245.Google Scholar
  2. Bruckmeier (Liebethal), C.: 2001, Die Auswirkung von Gerätekorrekturen auf die Schließung der Energiebilanz am Erdboden, Diploma Thesis, University of Bayreuth (Germany), 98 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Foken, T. and Oncley, S. P.: 1995, ‘Results of the workshop “Instrumental and Methodical Problems of Land Surface Flux Measurements”’, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 76, 1191–1193.Google Scholar
  4. Foken, T. and Wichura, B.: 1996, ‘Tools for Quality Assessment of Surface-Based Flux Measurements’, Agric. For. Meteorol. 78, 83–105.Google Scholar
  5. Fuehrer, P. L. and Friehe, C. A.: 2002, ‘Flux corrections revisited’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 102, 415–457.Google Scholar
  6. Göckede, M. and Foken, T.: 2001, ‘DeEin weiterentwickeltes Holtslag-van Ulden-Schema zur Stabilitätsparametrisierung in der Bodenschicht’, Österr. Beitr. Meteorol. Geophys. 27, 210 (preprint). Full paper at: Scholar
  7. Kramm, G., Dlugi, R., and Lenschow, D. H.: 1995, ‘A Re-Evaluation of the Webb Correction Using Density-Weighted Averages’, J. Hydrol. 166, 293–311.Google Scholar
  8. Oncley, S., Foken, T., Vogt, R., Bernhofer, C., Kohsiek, W., Liu, H., Pitacco, A., Grantz, D., and Riberio, L.: 2002, ‘The Energy Balance Experiment EBEX-2000’, in 15th Conference on Boundary Layer and Turbulence, Wageningen, The Netherlands, July 15–19, 2002, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  9. Webb, E. K., Pearman, G. I., and Leuning, R.: 1980, ‘Correction of the Flux Measurements for Density Effects Due to Heat and Water Vapour Transfer’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 106, 85–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Liebethal
    • 1
  • Thomas Foken
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MicrometeorologyUniversity of BayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations