Russian Journal of Genetics

, Volume 39, Issue 8, pp 909–916 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Effect of Pollen Irradiation on Karyotype Variability in M2 Cotton Plants

  • M. F. Sanamyan
Article

Abstract

The karyotypes of biomorphologically abnormal cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants obtained in M2 after pollination with pollen irradiated at dose rates 10, 15, 20, and 25 Gy were studied. Various genomic and chromosomal mutations were detected in 57 M2 families. The primary monosomics isolated in M2 were found to be cytologically more stable and more viable, since they had higher meiotic index, pollen fertility, and seed formation. In M2, a decrease in the number of plants with multiple karyotype aberrations and interchromosomal exchanges with high frequency of multivalent formation was observed. The multivalent configurations had different types and chromosome disjunctions. Their pollen fertility was higher than in translocants found in M1. Desynapsis often occurred in M2, including plants with chromosome deficiency or rearrangements. The variation in the number of univalents in various cells was found to result from different expression of synaptic genes. The results indicate stabilization of karyotypes, increase in cytologic stability and viability, and the absence of sterility in aberrant plants.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Endrizzi, J.E., Turcotte, E.L., and Kohel, R.J., Genetics, Cytology and Evolution of Gossypium, Adv. Genet., 1985, vol. 23, pp. 271-375.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stelly, D.M., Interfacing Cytogenetics with the Cotton Genome Mapping Effort, Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. (New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, January pp10-14), Herber, D.J. and Richter, D.A., Eds., Memphis, Tenn., 1993, pp. 1545-1550.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ji, Y., Raska, D.A., Mc Knight, T.D., et al., Use of Meiotic FISH for Identification of a New Monosome in Gossypium hirsutum L., Genome, 1997, vol. 40, pp. 34-40.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, M.S., Identification of the Chromosomes of Gossypium hirsutum L. by Means of Translocation, J. Hered., 1980, vol. 71, pp. 266-274.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khush, G.S., Cytogenetics of Aneuploids, New York: Academic, 1973.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clausen, R.E. and Cameron, D.R., Inheritance in Nicotiana tabacum: XVIII. Monosomic Analysis, Genetics, 1944, vol. 29, pp. 447-477.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanamyan, M.F. and Petlyakova, J.E., Cytogenetic Analysis of Cotton Monosomics, Biol. Plant., 2002, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 367-373.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morrison, J.W. and Unrau, J., Frequency of Micronuclei in Pollen Quartets of Common Wheat Monosomics, Can. J. Bot., 1952, vol. 30, pp. 371-378.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ray, D.T., Metaphase I Configurations of the Reciprocal Translocations in a Cytogenetic Tester of Gossypium hirsutum L., J. Hered., 1984, vol. 75, pp. 371-377.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sosnikhina, S.N. and Smirnov, V.G., Isolation and Analysis of Meiotic Mutants in Cross-Pollinating Cereals, Tsitogenetika zernovykh kul'tur (Cytogenetics of Cultivated Cereals), Tallinn, 1990, pp. 122-128.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhirov, E.G., Bessarab, K.S., and Gubanova, M.A., A Genetic Study of Partial Desynapsis in Common Wheat, Genetika (Moscow), 1973, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18-29.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sosnikhina, S.P., Smirnov, V.G., and Mikhailova, E.I., A Cytogenetic Study of an Asynaptic Mutant of Rye, Genetika (Moscow), 1989, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 2157-2167.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sosnikhina, S.P., Smirnov, V.G., Mikhailova, E.I., and Egorova, L.F., Partial Asynapsis Mutation in Rye, Genetika (Moscow), 1992, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 128-136.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fedotova, Yu.S., Kolomiets, O.L., and Bogdanov, Yu.F., Electron Microscopic Analysis of Meiosis in Rye Mutants with Disturbed Chromosome Synapsis, Genetika (Moscow), 1989, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 462-468.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bogdanov, Yu.F., Grishaeva, T.M., Kolomiets, O.L., and Fedotova, Yu.S., Cytogenetic Regularities at Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis in Animals and Plants, Genetika (Moscow), 1996, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1474-1493.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beasley, J.O. and Brown, M.S., Asynaptic Gossypium Plants and Their Polyploids, J. Agric. Res., 1942, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 421-427.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weaver, J.B., An Asynaptic Character in Cotton Inherited as a Double Recessive, Crop Sci., 1971, vol. 11, pp. 927-928.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smithson, J.B., Asynapsis in Cotton, Cott. Grow. Rev., 1974, vol. 51, pp. 99-105.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanamyan, M.F., Petlyakova, J.E., and Musaev, D.A., The Development and a Cytogenetic Study of Monosomics of Gossypium hirsutum L., Biol. Plant., 2000, vol. 43, pp. 193-197.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sanamyan, M.F., Evaluation of the Effect of Pollen Irradiation on Karyotype Variability in M1 Cotton Plants, Genetika (Moscow), 2003, vol. 39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. F. Sanamyan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Genetics and CytoembryologyNational University of UzbekistanTashkentUzbekistan

Personalised recommendations