Advertisement

Journal of Community Health

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 45–56 | Cite as

Using Focus Group Methodology to Develop Breast Cancer Screening Programs that Recruit African American Women

  • G. Anthony Williams
  • R. Roderic Abbott
  • D. Kay Taylor
Article

Abstract

Public communication campaigns are designed to increase the number of women who receive mammograms, breast examinations, and cervical exams. However, these campaigns have failed to recruit sufficient numbers of African American women. Focus group techniques were used to provide data to develop a communication campaign that would increase the knowledge, assess the attitudes, and change behaviors of African American women, aged 40–65, about the aforementioned preventive health practices. The discussions revealed that participants distrusted “clinics” and preferred being examined by “their own” or a private physician. Results further revealed that the personal influence of opinion leaders, combined with interpersonal contacts that encourage preventive care, help influence women to participate in mammography and cervical cancer screening.

Keywords

Focus Group Cervical Cancer African American Woman Cervical Cancer Screening Opinion Leader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society. Cancer in the economically disadvantaged: A special report prepared by the Subcommittee on Cancer in the Economically Disadvantaged. 1986, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Freeman HP, Wasfie TJ. Cancer of the breast in poor black women. Cancer 1989; 63:2562–2569.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lackland DT, Dunbar JB, Keil JE, Knapp RG, O'Brien PH. Breast cancer screening in a biracial community: The Charleston tricounty experience. South Med J 1991; 84:862–866.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whitman S, Ansell D, Lacey L, et al. Patterns of breast and cervical cancer screening at three public health centers in an inner-city urban area. Am J Public Health 1991; 81:1651–1653.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vernon SW, Vogel VG, Halabi S, Jackson GL, Lundy RO, Peters GN. Breast cancer screening behaviors and attitudes in three racial/ethnic groups. Cancer 1992; 69:165–174.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ansell DA, Dillard J, Rothenberg M, et al. Breast cancer screening in an urban black population. Cancer 1988; 62:425–428.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCoy CB. Increasing breast cancer screening among the medically underserved—Dade County, Florida, September 1987–March 1991. MMWR 1991; 40:261–263.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dodds ME, Dowd SL, Mitchell-Beren M, Yarbrough M, Choi K. A breast cancer screening program in a community hospital. J Community Health 1991; 16:241–249.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hecht W, Ribeau S. African American Communication Styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Michigan Department of Public Health. Minority Health in Michigan: Closing the Gap. 1988, pp 131–138.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kruger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide to Applied Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morgan DL. Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Basch CE. Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q 1987; 14:411–448.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lazarsfeld P, Berelson B, Gaudet H. The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1948.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Anthony Williams
    • 1
  • R. Roderic Abbott
    • 2
  • D. Kay Taylor
    • 3
  1. 1.Telecommunication DepartmentMichigan State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Cancer Center atHurley Medical CenterUSA
  3. 3.Hurley Medical CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations